World
Bank Unmasked
By WBIPT Secretariat
06 December, 2007
Combat
Law
An Independent People's
Tribunal on the World Bank Group in India held in New Delhi gave the
first ever opportunity to affected people, experts and academics from
about 60 grassroots civil society groups to be heard by a jury of eminent
and distinguished retired judges, social workers and public leaders.
Excerpts from jury's preliminary findings.
We, the twelve jury members,
have listened to four days of testimony and depositions from September
21 to 24, 2007 by affected people, experts and academics from some 60
grassroots, civil society groups and communities from all over India.
The presentations covered 26 different sectors of economic and social
development, ranging in scope from the macro-economic impact of wide
ranging economic policies to testimonies from representatives of communities
said to have been harmed and impoverished by specific World Bank financed
projects. Our members include former justices of the Indian Supreme
Court and High Courts, lawyers, writers, scientists, economists, religious
leaders, and former Indian government officials. We note that the World
Bank Delhi office received an invitation to attend the Tribunal two
weeks in advance, but did not wish to participate in the proceedings.
"First
and foremost, the evidence and depositions we have witnessed presents
a disturbing and shocking picture of increased and needless human suffering
since 1991 among hundreds of millions of India's poorest and most disadvantaged
in rural areas and in the cities. It is clear to us that a significant
number of Indian government policies and projects financed and influenced
by the World Bank have contributed directly and/or indirectly to this
increased impoverishment and suffering. All this has taken place while
a minority of India's population that constitutes the middle class and
rich has enjoyed the fruits of an economic boom.
"The most disturbing leading indicator for this suffering is the
alarming increase in farmer suicides since the 1990s. From 2001 to 2007
alone, according to the Indian minister of agriculture, 1,37,000 poor
farmers have killed themselves. These deaths are not random events;
the evidence we heard points to increasing financial pressures on farmers
all over India as a result of some or all of the following policies,
such as: reduced subsidies from the centre and states, higher prices
for poor farmers for irrigation water, electric power, and seeds; reduced
subsidies for agricultural inputs, reduced access to low interest loans
for the poor, and opening up of the Indian economy to an uneven playing
field in international trade in agricultural commodities. India's farmers
must now compete with imports from the heavily subsidised farms of the
European Union and North America, at the same time when even the most
meagre state assistance for the poorest farmers is reduced. India was
once self-sufficient in food production; its food security is now dependent
on imports. It is clear to us that major World Bank Economic Restructuring,
Structural Adjustment, and Sector Loans have directly promoted and helped
to finance these economic policy changes which are a disaster for much
of India's more than 700 million rural inhabitants, and most disastrous
of all for poor farmers.
"Other World Bank loans have promoted the institution of user fees
in the health and education sectors, as well as partial privatisation
in these sectors. Whatever the justification for these policies, we
heard how in practice, they have further disadvantaged the poor. The
Bank is promoting legal and regulatory changes the main focus of which
appears to lessen the social and environmental compliance burdens for
industry and investors, rather than protect the vulnerable livelihoods
and environments of India's poor majority. The net effect of many Bank
prescribed policy "reforms" appears to be the reorientation
of the Indian State priorities from striving to secure a safety net
for the poor and vulnerable to providing a safety net for large domestic
and international corporations and investors.
"We
heard witnesses from the poorest Dalit and Adivasi communities describe
the deterioration for their communities from poverty to destitution
because of forced displacement caused by World Bank financed projects.
A number of these projects are notorious and communities have sought
redress for years: the Bank's massive loans for thermal power development
in Singrauli in the 1980s displaced many tens of thousands of poor,
who have sought economic rehabilitation and improvement of toxic environmental
conditions, with no redress from the Bank or its Indian government borrower,
NTPC. We heard of the plight of hundreds of families impoverished by
displacement in the Bank financed Coal Sector Rehabilitation Project,
despite the claims of a separate Bank Coal Sector Environmental and
Social Mitigation Project. Although the Bank's own Independent Inspection
Panel found in 2002 that Bank management violated its own environmental
and resettlement policies on 37 counts, the Bank management has taken
no effective measures to ameliorate the condition of these families.
These examples are only a small sample of a massive pattern of forcible
displacement of India's poorest and most vulnerable populations for
large-scale natural resources extraction, infrastructure and urban projects,
a number of which have been directly financed by the Bank. The Bank
has announced its intention to increase its financing of large-scale
projects while at the same time there is disturbing evidence of its
widespread failure to implement its environmental and social safeguards,
as well as indications of intentions to even dilute the effective rigour
of these safeguards.
"One
of the disturbing impressions we gathered from the presentations is
that the bank seems to have developed the art of making policies whose
safeguards are only on paper. It has developed a language game in which
words like empowerment actually means disempowerment, sustainable means
unsustainable, public-private partnesrship means using the public to
promote the interests of the private.
"It
is impossible to do justice in our short preliminary statement to the
volume, scope and intensity of the scores of depositions, expert presentations,
and eye witness accounts we have heard over the past four days. The
Tribunal will be publishing more detailed accounts, and we will submit
a more detailed set of findings and recommendations in a few weeks'
time. What emerges is a picture of an institution whose influence on
the economic and social policies of the Indian government is much greater
than the amount of its lending might indicate. The Indian government,
of course, shares at the very least equal responsibility for all of
the abuses we have witnessed, indeed a significant number of officials
in key ministries such as finance and planning have either worked at
the Bank or IMF, or share their assumptions and biases. Together all
bear considerable responsibility for wide reaching policies and specific
investments which in the name of growth and development have had the
cruelest impact on the most vulnerable groups in our society.
"We
hold the Indian government accountable and call for changes in these
policies. India and the international community must join to hold the
World Bank accountable for policies and projects that in practice directly
contradict its mandate of alleviating poverty for the poorest."
Highlights
of the IPT
Vice Chairman
of the Kerala State Planning Board Professor Prabhat Patnaik in his
deposition cited the example of the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban
Renewal Mission (JNURM), which is a World Bank designed project. In
the Kerala JNURM project, the state government, he said, was being forced
to accept a conditionality to reduce stamp duties to 5 percent from
the earlier 15-17 percent. To avail a loan of about Rs.1000 crores,
Kerala would lose up to Rs.7000 crores of government revenue.
Vinay Baindur
of the Bangalore-based Collaborative for the Advancement of Studies
in Urbanism (CASUMM) showed evidence of how the Karnataka Economic Restructuring
Loan (KERL) resulted in the conversion of a state government and its
economy into a corporatised entity meant to generate funds for "private
sector and enterprise development". 'The $250 million loan resulted
in far reaching changes; the closure/privatisation of the public sector,
nearly two lakh permanent employees were forced to take Voluntary Retirement
Scheme (VRS) payments. The World Bank ordained restructuring process
led to a steep rise in farmer suicides, many of those who committed
suicide did so because they were unable to pay the arrears in power
costs that were suddenly slapped on them on account of power tariff
hikes. "The withdrawal of subsidies for agriculture led to a sharp
rise in the costs of cultivation", argued Baindur in his deposition.
Jury member and scientist Meher Engineer said that the World Bank forced
inappropriate technology on India such as incinerators especially damning.
"Given the well researched evidence that I have heard, it is hard
to imagine any role for the World Bank in the environment sector, he
said. "The Bank is pro-rich, pro-urban and anti-environment",
he concluded.
In the 1990s,
20-30 percent of World Bank loans in India went to the energy sector.
Orissa had the dubious distinction of being the first state to receive
World Bank loans for restructuring the sector. Sreekumar N, from the
Pune-based Prayas Energy Group argued that based on World Bank advice,
Orissa spent upto Rs.306 crores for foreign consultants, ignoring local
expertise. The consultants recommended the privatisation of distribution
and the American firm AES that took over distribution in the central
zone and behaved in a high handed manner and ultimately left the state
in 2001.
Nityanand
Jayaraman of the Chennai-based Corporate Accountability Desk in his
desposition before the jury said, "The Bank is perpetrating toxic
colonialism by funding discredited and polluting technology interventions".
As evidence he presented cases where the Bank has promoted the setting
up of more than 88 Common Effluent Treatment Plants, more than 90 percent
of which were shown to have failed to meet environmental norms by the
Central Pollution Control Board.
Wilfred D' Costa, general secretary of the Indian Social Action Forum
(INSAF) — one of the convening groups of the IPT — said,
The tribunal has been useful since it has seen a convergence of social
movements, unions, academicians, researchers and struggle groups from
across the country. "Our next steps would be to use this platform
to create a broad- based political struggle against neo-liberalism and
work towards an India without institutions such as the World Bank and
the Asian Development Bank."
The jury
members included:
Amit Bhaduri, Meher Engineer, Ramaswamy Iyer, Alejandro Nadal, Bruce
Rich, Aruna Roy,
Arundhati Roy, Justice PB Sawant,
SP Shukla, Sulak Sivaraksa,
Justice H Suresh and Justice Usha
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.