Political
Market For Midget Europe
In The Giant Asia
By
Gaither Stewart
15 December,
2007
Countercurrents.org
(Rome)
The Italian political economist, Michele Salvati, notes in
an article in the Milan daily, Corriere della Sera, that globalization
has eroded the capacity of the role of the small traditional European
ethnic state to furnish a model for the future. For Europe the emergence
of China and India as world economic giants change the political backdrop
of the world order. Huge countries inhabited by races and cultures different
from ours point toward an accelerated shrinking of the planetary roles
of Europe and the United States.
The shift
eastwards of the balance of power raises another question: what kind
of political organization will the Asia-oriented globalized world have?
It is not excluded that the European political model with its theories
of the equality of all men will carry no weight in the socio-political
make-up of the world of the future.
For two hundred
years Europe has experimented with a political system based on the interplay
between the Left and the Right. Basically Left has meant the collective;
Right, the individual. The result of this dichotomy is the heart of
the European Idea. Today globalization is challenging that coherent
system because a globally organized world creates new tensions and new
difficulties for the survival of the old ethnic nations.
Still, the
Left-Right principle survives. In the past the major countries of the
Old World have overcome other phases of internationalization without
discarding the open political debate between Left and Right. Markets
and international finance, colonialism and imperialism, major migrations
and conflicts with other cultures are after all familiar subjects for
Europe.
Today’s
situation is however different precisely because of the aggressive and
unbound form of globalization economics and the entrance on the world
scene of dynamic and overly dimensioned non-European economic powers.
In West Europe’s
parliamentary systems the divergence and interaction between progressive
and conservative have been consolidated since the revolutions of the
18th century. The conflict between the two political ideas was born
together with concepts of individualism and liberalism and the fundamental
idea that all men are equal. The Left has stood for redistribution of
wealth to the collective, the Right for concentration of wealth in the
hands of a few.
For two centuries
the Left has pressed for political rights, equality of social and economic
opportunities for all and a strong role for the state. The Right, in
the name of tradition, entrepreneurial freedoms and the accumulation
of capital, has resisted state controls and intervention.
Now again
in Europe suffering under the onslaught of globalization—exportation
of jobs, energy shortages and an over-valued currency—the individual
again stands in the forefront. In the past both Left and Right have
stumbled over the problem of the individual, the Left in the name of
the collective, the Right in the name of capital accumulation. For the
old Left, the collective has commanded. For the Right, freedom means
freedom for a few to exploit the collective.
The European
Left has both promoted and feared the European Union, positive to the
degree that it is a union of ethnic and cultural communities and peoples,
negative if it is merely a union of multi-nationals to better exploit
labor on a universal scale.
Last century
over-emphasis on the nation, whether of Left or Right, degenerated into
patriotism and nationalism, overshadowing the real interests of the
individual in West Europe. In the name of nation or race (Fascism and
Nazism), the compact society of patriots led to two world wars and the
greatest massacres modern man has known.
Society’s
problem is how to resolve the quandary of balancing individual freedom
and the role of the just state. The USA has not resolved the issue.
It has only buried it alive.
Europe, of
Left and Right, is more resistant. Reformism is still alive. The Right
of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy, Nicolas Sarkozy in France and Chancellor
Angela Merkel in Germany have had to find some balance between the two
poles. Therefore few social advances achieved in the past have been
completely eliminated in contemporary continental Europe as some political
leaders have proposed.
Values deriving from the Illuminist tradition have prevailed. However,
as shown by periods of failure such as European imperialism-colonialism
and Fascism-Nazism it has not been an easy road. Nevertheless the basic
political debate between Left and Right has always returned as the axis
around which European society revolves. This is the evolution of fundamental
democracy handed down from ancient Greece.
Though post-Enlightenment
Europe has faced weakly the question of international political order
for these two centuries, curious political thinkers such as Salvati
and futurologists speculate about this aspect of the future world—how
will humans organize that world in order to offer social justice and
equal rights for all?
There is
no guarantee that the Left-Right dichotomy will survive in the future
world since we have no basis for predicting whether the mysterious New
World Order will even remotely resemble the ideal of democracy. It seems
unlikely that the USA in decline, with its bizarre idea of exportation
of democracy, can control the future world. Perhaps, on the other hand,
the new world society will resemble something out of a scary futuristic
film.
In any case
the orientation of thought about the New World Order throws into crisis
concepts of sovereign national states and together with them the Left-Right
dichotomy, the beating heart of the European idea.
Is Europe’s
Big Chance Around the Corner?
Michele Salvati
concludes that it is strange that in our rapidly changing world thinkers
concerned with the effect of globalization on politics do not also discuss
the influence of politics on globalization and the future international
political order.
The political
sphere will have an enormous influence on the direction the planet will
take in immediate future. In the vacuum left by an increasingly ugly
United States, Europe has the opportunity of resuming its place as a
fount of ideas and guarantor of social justice. Beyond the transmission
of its political model to the new economic giants of Asia, Europe’s
ideas on matters such as race and religious relations, the welfare state,
world-wide elimination of capital punishment, universal health care
and defense of the environment in Asia as a whole—which by the
year 2010 will consume more energy than the USA—can be invaluable.
It is here
in this democratic, Left-Right concept of society, that Salvati bases
his hopes that the United Europe of the future, even with its half billion
population still a midget in relation to the emerging global economy,
will make its greatest gift to the world.
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.