Is Not An Option
Review: Surrender is Not an Option – Defending America at the
United Nations and Abroad By John Bolton. Simon & Schuster, Threshold
Editions, New York. 2007.
is an interesting perspective, that of America needing ‘defending’,
but it is one that John Bolton holds to thoroughly in “Surrender
is Not an Option.” Surrounded by terrorists, ‘Islamofascists’,
the old guard complacency of the “EUroids”, a resurgent
Russian Empire, a belligerent if not hostile China, and almost above
all else the two largest threats of Iran and North Korea, the United
States certainly finds itself in a hostile world. Internally the “liberals”,
the left, the “High Minded” are all appeasing fifth columnists
who do not know how to defend America properly against these external
threats. Bolton’s focus is trying to promote this perspective
as U.S. Ambassador at the United Nations headquarters in New York, a
building as such that he is oft quoted as saying would not be affected
if the top ten floors disappeared.
finally, the UN could up and disappear for all he is concerned unless
he can make it useful to U.S. purposes. In an all too brief summary
of American views he holds that “the UN was widely viewed in America
as ineffective at best, and adverse to U.S. interests and deeply corrupt
at worst.” The audience he is hoping to reach “is not only
these disillusioned Americans, but those who think glowingly of the
UN as they had imagined it on Halloweens long ago.” I fit both
categories – okay, I am not American, but a resident of the nearest
and weakest full on ally – as one who is constantly reminded of
the peacekeeping promise of Nobel Peace Prize winner Lester B. Pearson’s
resolution to form “"an emergency international United Nations
force to secure and supervise the cessation of hostilities," now
witnessing Canadian foreign policy (and indeed domestic policy) falling
in line with the military-corporate line of the United States. For once
I agreed with Bolton, that the UN needs serious reforming, but assuredly
with strongly different ideas as to how to do so.
I had hoped
when purchasing this book that I could delve into the workings of Bolton’s
mind, be able to examine his reasoning, be challenged and angered and
affronted (something Bolton takes personal pride in towards the liberal,
left, High minded folks), to check my knee jerk reactions to examine
them for reasoned support or erroneous pre-conceptions. Usually when
I read books on economics, politics, militarism, history et al, they
are filled with margin notes, question marks, cross page referencing
of both supporting and contradictory messages, and quick comments that
I qualify and perhaps quantify later on. While expecting a good combative
read from Bolton’s philosophy and perspective of his own story,
I unfortunately was, in Bolton’s words, disillusioned.
This is not
quintessential Bolton: it is not “A fascinating chronicle of his
career,” it is not a “revealing memoir,” nor is it
“a more realistic global security arrangement for the twenty first
century” (jacket cover descriptions). For the latter, global security
for Bolton can be summed up with the idea that the world needs to operate
as the U.S. sees it, as the U.S. requires for its own security and strategic
interests and the rest of the world be damned. For the former, the revelations
and fascination were regularly overcome by the somniferous effect of
this essentially meaningless work. If you already are familiar with
John Bolton, this offers no new insights (although I was briefly hopeful
when he began with the first chapter that actually showed some character
development with his father, Jack Bolton). If you are not familiar with
John Bolton, this work offers very few insights, and without providing
background reasoning or underpinning philosophical ideas, there is little
to clue the reader in to Bolton’s deeper thoughts, unless….
no knee jerk reactions to this ‘chronicle’ of Bolton’s
life. Where was the great arguer? The great antagonizer? Where were
his argumentative positions on all that was wrong with the world outside
the United States and justification for its god-given right to world
supremacy? At times, just when I thought he might be getting into something
more meaty, such as “How and why the promise of the UN Peacekeeping
was blunted in the post-Cold War era,” he signs it off saying
“it is beyond what I can treat here.” He leaves all his
positions as supposedly self-evident, as though his deeper thoughts….
So what does
he “treat here”?
here is a long diary of whom he met with, when he met them, where he
met them, who manipulated whom, with the main ‘character’
development being the frequent, short, sarcastic Coulterisms used to
describe those personalities and ideas he did not like. As for actual
personality, not much comes through. For all his encounters with Rice,
Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, Bush at home and with all the other UN representatives,
there is little if anything in the way of character development that
could draw the reader into the dialogue and diary much more intently.
All the characters are bland, all they seem to do is meet, talk, vote,
fly around, meet, talk, and vote some more. So what is Bush really like,
other than “the guy who got elected?” Does he really speak
in full complex sentence structures as you quote, or is he really the
speech challenged individual evident on the news sound bites? What is
it really like to work with Cheney? Is he the genial grandfatherly type
as his wife indicated on John Stewart? Is Rumsfeld truly a sneering
sarcastic manipulator for the American cause as media sound bites show?
There is no sense of character even for himself other than the endless
righteous minded servant serving “the guy who got elected.”
what of the ideas, the political perspectives – other than the
so narrowly defined good-guys bad-guys black and white world of us and
them? Every now and then a brief hiccup of an idea comes through, such
as the one mentioned on Africa above. Very briefly unconditional support
for Israel is touched upon without any reasoning or thought applied
to tell the “audience” why it should be that way, leaving
the reader to know that the fall back position is always America first,
foremost, and always and anything along the way that promotes their
strategic global control.
One of Bolton’s
final statements is “Disagreement reveals underlying issues that
should be resolved consistently with our own interests, and it is those
interests that should determine how we proceed.”[emphasis added]
Great, tell us about those underlying issues, tell us about what really
interests the U.S. and why, get back to the old antagonizing zealous
self and put your reasons forward. No more of this brief idea, no development,
and then off into the world of who met whom, who voted for what, when,
and where, but never reasoned why.
Unless…unless that is all there is? Bland personalities. Shallow
thinkers. Sarcastic adjectives posing as intelligent thought. Where
is the fiery guy of whom Jesse Helms said “"John Bolton is
the kind of man with whom I would want to stand at Armageddon, or what
the Bible describes as the final battle between good and evil."
John, is that bland fellow really you? I hardly think so…yet from
your writing here, it is a highly plausible conclusion.
Hopefully Mr. Bolton, your next work – and there should be another
one as your final lines indicate that you will “keep moving. And
keep firing” – will present more self, more argument, more
analysis from your perspective. Something to really dig into and be
aggravated by. As it stands, “Surrender is Not an Option”
is mostly a diary of what, where, when, and who, perhaps an accurate
historical record, but certainly not something that will achieve lasting
status as a work of critical thought.
Miles is a Canadian educator and a regular contributor/columnist
of opinion pieces and book reviews for The Palestine Chronicle. His
interest in this topic stems originally from an environmental perspective,
which encompasses the militarization and economic subjugation of the
global community and its commodification by corporate governance and
by the American government. Miles’ work is also presented globally
through other alternative websites and news publications.
Share Your Insights
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.