Defining
Minorities
By Ram Puniyani
11 April, 2007
Countercurrents.org
Allahabad
High Court ruling (April 2007) that Muslims have ceased to be a minority
in UP as their percentage in population is 18.5% totally defies the
logic of Indian Constitution, the legislatures understanding and the
pronouncements of the Supreme court on the issue. No wonder it has been
stayed by a two judge bench. This verdict gave a lot of ammunition to
many to feel jubilant, and pen pushers of right wing ideology got extra
boost to spew their anti minority sentiments. It is argued that by retaining
the concept of minority these sections are reminded about their being
'different' and that sows the seed of divisiveness. They even point
out that Africans-Americans were/are considered a minority as there
was systematic injustice against them, they were discriminated against.
But in India there is no such case for Muslims so they should not be
considered as minorities, neither should there be any affirmative action
for them.
There have been similar sentiments
by a large section of ideologues that belong to Right wing politics.
It is also noteworthy, that these are precisely same sections who celebrate
when the quota for OBC is questioned and reservations against dalits
are opposed.
Is there a place for minority
concept in democracy, and who should be called a minority? These questions
were settled by the Constituent assembly and samples of the debates
around these issues indicate the national thinking on that. The attitude
of the founders of Indian Constitution, who were themselves echoing
the values of freedom movement, indicates a lot on the matter. It was
pointed out in Constituent assembly debates that numerical weakness
and soci-economic vulnerability should be the major criterion in defining
the minority. Even the United Nations charter of Human rights went on
to recommend the affirmative action towards minorities of all
types. India is a signatory to many a UN declarations on minority rights.
All minorities are not disadvantaged.
We can see that Brahmins are also a minority within Hindu religion,
but the prevalent caste system gave them inherent advantage. There are
people who try to find a 'poor' Brahmin as a ground to show that caste
based reservations are not valid. But surely the social connections
of Brahmin minority, ensures that poor and deprived Brahmins, is more
a matter of exception. In India the minority generally boils down to
religious minority. This is more of a legacy of the India's the policies
and politics which were prevalent before Independence, and this, while
prevalent all through, has got re-strengthened after the rise of religion
based politics from the decade of eighties. This identity politics has
rolled back many a conceptual developments which were in progress during
the decades immediately after the independence.
The affirmative action for
dalits and OBC itself has come under heavy criticism from the same social
sectors. Also the thought of development programs for Muslim sends shivers
of discomfort amongst many. We have witnessed that a particular ideology
which is solidly against this affirmative action for dalits and minorities,
was at the root of riots against dalits and OBCs, in Gujarat in the
decade of 1980s. This ideology suits those whose children are in the
category of 'economic reservation' as they can openly 'buy' education,
knowledge and degrees by shelling out the bagfuls of money.
One wonders how the condition
of Indian Muslims is different from that of African Americans for whom
affirmative action is being accepted and recommended. Have Muslims found
a decent, tolerant atmosphere here? Let's recall that 'social common
sense' has been against them all through. The policy of subtle discrimination
against them was in operation all through. Private sector dominated
by the non Muslims kept them out deliberately. As communal violence
was unleashed from sixties, it went on rising and went to critical limits
from the decades of 80s. Various
statistics coming from Home ministry Government of India, compilation
of data on riot victims shows that over 80% of riot victims are Muslims.
The violence has ghettoized large section of this community. The progressive
norms which were being picked up by the community despite economic odds
got a set back after the Babri demolition and massive anti Muslim violence
which followed. Later after the Gujarat carnage, this process of ghettoization
got intensified. Today irrespective of whether communalism, communal
violence is visible or not, most of the states are witnessing an atmosphere
where minorities feel intimidated and stifled.
It is true that minorities
should not perpetuate their condition and try to come out of minority
psyche and feel like anybody else. But what happens if the political
climate is very adverse to your progress. What happens when the social
thinking demonizes you times and over again, in every aspect of social
existence, on any or every pretext? The earlier slogan of Jan Sangh,
the previous avatar of BJP, had launched campaign called "Indianize
Muslims"; giving a clear message that they are not Indians and
so they must be Indianized. This is a 'catch twenty-two'. On one hand
minorities are excluded from the process of social development, as they
are the 'other' and at the same time a demand is made to them to subordinate
to the dictates of dominant political stream which is trying to assert
as to what should be the social norms. This exclusionary religious tendency
is presenting their religious symbolism as the national symbolism.
Every study and data has
been pointing to the worsening position of Muslim community. First the
Gopal Singh Committee and now the Sachar Committee has shown this marginalization
and exclusion. How does one become part of so called mainstream when
one feels excluded and jeered upon? And if for bringing them on par
with others, if some efforts are undertaken to protect their interests,
to support them breathe freely, is it divisive factor or is it only
way to strengthen our society? Some ideologues are used to the image
of society in the past 'glories' where the Shudras, in their ghettoes,
lived to serve the upper caste masters. Is it that which is being presented
as the ideal nation? The tendency which is trying to dominate in the
name of religion, essentially wants to bring back that state of society
and so the opposes the efforts which will empower the ghettoized masses.
The criticism against Sachar committee is that it is creating myth that
Muslims are disempowered, and so this committee report should be ignored
and bypassed. What are the parameters for assessing the level of empowerment
or otherwise of a social group? Surely the socio, economic and political
representation should be the main parameter. One knows that not only
that Muslim community has seriously been excluded from the development
process, they were also forced into low level self employment, that's
why some surveys may find that rate of their employment is better than
others. Here the definition of employment has to be kept in mind. As
such the type of self employment which a large section of Muslim community
had to resort to was the last option and not a preferred choice. It
has become the norm because of the exclusionary policies adopted by
the sections of society, who have a powerful say in the matters, and
in the running of the state. It by no means is a symbol of empowerment
of minorities.
One is sure that the two
judge bench's superseding the 'Muslims are not a minority judgment'
will be upheld by the due process of law. In the overall political scenario
and the economic perspective, a radical change has to take place where
suitable employment for every person is the norm. The size of cake is
also a problem. The type of economic development being pursued has to
be superseded by one which aims at giving employment to all, and in
the interregnum the affirmative action for different disadvantaged sections
has to be pursued to unite the society. The definition of minorities
needs to be recalled from the Indian constitution and understood in
the context of constituent assembly debates.
Click
here to comment
on this article