Support Indy
Media

Popularise CC

Join News Letter

Read CC In Your
Own Language

CC Malayalam

Iraq

Peak Oil

Climate Change

US Imperialism

US Elections

Palestine

Latin America

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Globalisation

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Book Review

Gujarat Pogrom

WSF

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

Submission Policy

Contact Us

Subscribe To Our
News Letter

Name: E-mail:

 

Printer Friendly Version

A Constant Nakba For
Palestine's Bedouin

By Ida Audeh
writing from Beit Iksa, occupied West Bank

11 July, 2008
Electronic Intifada

"We [Bedouin] are the [Native Americans] of Palestine," is how 60-year-old Mohammad Ahmad Abu Dahook introduced the author and a colleague to Beit Iksa. Located nine kilometers northwest of Jerusalem, the land of Beit Iksa's 1,600 residents is among that targeted by Israel for the expanding of its illegal Ma'ale Adumim settlement. Abu Dahook is one of the approximately 50,000 Bedouin whose traditions and lifestyle have been nearly destroyed by Israeli colonization. Their communities are still being displaced by Israel's illegal land annexation and the transfer of Israel's civilian population to territory it occupies, in violation of international humanitarian law. Abu Dahook and others like him see no relief in sight as they are constantly dogged by Israeli threats of further displacement and neglect by the Palestinian Authority.

"My people were forcibly expelled by the Israelis in 1951, three years after the Nakba," Abu Dahook explained, referring to the forced displacement of the indigenous Palestinian population from their homeland perpetrated by Zionist militias during the establishment of the Israeli state in 1948 -- the year of Abu Dahook's birth. "The Israelis came to [my people's] areas and killed people. They burned Bedouin tents and possessions and killed livestock. They used terrorist methods and instilled fear. People didn't leave because of rumors; they left because they were forced out. Many were martyred."

Abu Dahook's personal history illustrates the human cost of Israel's national project to establish a state exclusive for world Jewry that could only be realized through the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population, land confiscation for the construction of armed Jewish-only settlements, and the confinement of the indigenous Palestinians into ever smaller spaces.

"When the Bedouin were expelled, they went first to the West Bank, to Hebron, Bethlehem, and the Jordan Valley. Some stayed in the West Bank, some went to Jordan, and some [emigrated] to Egypt and then returned to Gaza," Abu Dahook explained. "A few families went to the Nusseirat camp in Gaza. The Jahalin tribe spread out, but the largest concentration was in the Jerusalem area, between 'Azariya to the west and Nabi Musa to the east, the area between Jericho and Jerusalem."

Abu Dahook's extended family is one of three families, with the Salamat and the Sray'a, that together make up the Jahalin tribe which lived originally in the Arad area in the south Negev, now Israel. Before the Nakba, Arab al-Jahalin had Turkish deeds to their agricultural lands. Israel was deliberate about emptying the land and taking as much of it as it could.

"My family went to Bethlehem, to the Beit Sahour area. They lived there for two to three years and then they settled in the Jerusalem area. Sometimes we lived in the Khan al-Ahmar area, east of 'Azariya, and in the summer we'd go to Nabi Samuel. A Bedouin moves around wherever there is food and water for the herds."

Abu Dahook explained that "In the 1950s, we were considered well-off compared to those around us. My father owned 100 heads of sheep and 10 camels at the time, and he was the sheikh. I was one of 13 kids; my father had two wives." According to Abu Dahook, "Some Bedouin were able to take their livestock with them; others had them taken by the Israelis." They tried their best to adapt; some become tenant farmers on small plots of land. Others became laborers, though work was hard to come by in the 1950s and others still bought goats or camels.

Abu Dahook recalls long walks to school and that health care was nonexistent. The UN agency for Palestine refugees, "UNRWA was completely negligent with the Bedouin sector. All of the refugees were in camps."

Although all of the members of the Jahalin tribe are refugees, only 80-85 percent are registered with UNRWA. "In 1952," Abu Dahook explained, "UNRWA rented land from the Jordanian Insha' wa ta'meer agency and established refugee camps, but it did nothing for the Bedouin. It didn't even send them a mobile health clinic. Some families in the Abu Dahook clan were not even included in the UNRWA census; they are refugees from Tel Arad but they don't have refugee cards. They never heard that there would be a census on a certain day and in a certain place, so they missed it. But I have a refugee card and so do my parents."

Carving a life among Israel's facts on the ground

"After the 1967 war, the Israeli army imposed a curfew on large cities. But our areas had no built houses; there were no towns for them to impose a curfew on them. Open areas can't be closed off easily," Abu Dahook explained. As the West Bank fell under Israeli occupation, Abu Dahook's family which lived in the Hizma triangle, east of Jerusalem, had once again to contend with Israel's tactics aimed at removing them from their land.

"When Israel came, it deliberately sowed fear among people, because its policy was to expel people and to empty the land from its residents. We Bedouins went in the direction of Fara'a, to avoid the Jordanian army camp nearby, so we took the children further away, toward the running stream of Ain Fara'a. People started to come from the western villages, from the Jerusalem area and from Ramallah and al-Bireh.

"The Jews were lining people up, killing the infant before the old man, the woman before the man. Some people were afraid and went to Jordan; some remained," Abu Dahook recalled.

Israel considers Wadi Qilt and Fara'a to be nature preserves under state protection, and it became forbidden for anyone to use it as grazing land or anything else. Settlers and tourists were never prevented from going there, but Bedouins were banned from doing so. Abu Dahook said that "other areas were declared to be closed military areas, even though there had never been a single bullet fired or even a stone thrown from them. It was just a way to deny the land to people. They destroyed people's tents and took them to military court and imposed fines on them or imprisoned them, and that slowly decreased the number of people there."

When the Israelis declared an area to be a closed military area, Abu Dahook said, "People didn't listen, they'd go anyway, but then [the Israelis] would shoot at their sheep. And when the Israelis saw that shooting the sheep wasn't a deterrent, they started to arrest the owner of the sheep or the shepherd, sometimes taking them away in military cars and sometimes in helicopters, and this happened to large numbers of people. They surrounded mountains and picked up whoever they found, 10, 15 people, send them in a helicopter to Bethlehem or Ramallah. [They'd] put them in a military court, impose a fine, and if he [didn't] pay it, they put him in prison. Fines at that time were high, about 1,000 lira, and at that time every nine Israeli liras was the equivalent of one Jordanian dinar. This was a large amount for people.

"The first time the green patrols came to Beit Iksa, they took my sheep to Qarantina in Beer Saba [now Beer Sheva] and fined me about 10,000 shekels. They claimed we were in Israel, but Beit Iksa is not within what they call the Green Line, it is the West Bank, and its residents hold West Bank ID cards. People who couldn't afford to pay would have to borrow money; they couldn't afford to let the Israelis take them. If I have sheep, I am tied to the land. I consider the sheep part of the cultural heritage and a national treasure at the same time."

Abu Dahook added, "In the 1970s it was still possible to criss-cross the West Bank from north to south. The army created problems when it found you, though. In the beginning, the Israelis paid no attention [if you moved your tent from one area to another]. But things changed after 1978. Then they would move you from where you were, and if they did, it was forbidden to you to return to it. If you try to return, they tear down your tent and expel you again. Khan al-Ahmar and other areas were considered closed military areas."

Abu Dahook explained that 1978 was a pivotal year for him and his extended family; in that year "Israeli soldiers came in large numbers with the dawn prayers and destroyed our homes and their contents. They came without warning. Before we knew it, they were just demolishing our tents with their cars. When a tent is held up by five or six ropes and a car comes and cuts them down, it collapses. And if it doesn't, the military car drives right through it and brings it down. They told us it was forbidden for us to live where we were, and they destroyed the area in a single day. What happened to me and my community [more than 300 families] in the Khan al-Ahmar area happened from the far north to the far south. They didn't spare anyone. If they came to me in 1978, they got to some people in 1977 and some in 1979."

When he and his family lived on private property in Anata and Abu Dis, Abu Dahook explained, "No one bothered us. The people in our towns and villages are honorable people. If the land is empty, what difference does it make to the owner whether we live on it? On the contrary, when we live on the property, we protect it. That's how people looked at it. None of them ever asked the Bedouin to leave the lands they lived on."

Bedouin like Mohammed Abu Dahook found little respite from Israeli policies after the 1993 Oslo Accords were signed between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization. According to Abu Dahook, "The hounding of the Bedouin in and around Hebron, Bethlehem, Jericho, Jerusalem and Ramallah picked up in 1997. The Israeli government wanted to expropriate more land for settlements prior to final status negotiations and to expand the city limits of Jerusalem to incorporate all surrounding settlements. About 60 families [450 people] were relocated to a hilltop, which was unsuitable for grazing and adjacent to a Jerusalem municipality city dump and unfit for habitation; they subsequently took their case to the courts. Other Bedouin families living near Anata, near East Jerusalem, have been given eviction notices so that Israel can build bypass roads. They have refused to leave. Bedouin tribes throughout the West Bank have been similarly targeted for displacement: al-Rashaydeh tribe east of Bethlehem; the Froush Beit Dajan north of Nablus; the Abu Abed Hamdan al-Turkman tribe in the Jenin area; the Arab al-Azazma, al-Ajajra, and al-Masaid tribes near Jericho; and the al-Hanajreh and al-Azazmeh tribes east of Hebron."

Abu Dahook explained that "In the 1990s, they started to give warnings stating that our homes would be demolished because we lacked building permits. As though a tent needs a permit! Sometimes they'd hand it to you, and sometimes they come by and if they don't find anyone, they'll post it [where you see it]." He added that "All of the tents here [in Beit Iksa] have gotten warnings from Israel in the 1990s. I myself received about four. In 1994 the Israelis came to me and gave me a warning. So I hired a lawyer, Shlomo Lecker, and the case went on for several years, and it reached the high court. The court issued an order overruling the expulsion and I was to go with them to Beit El so that the leaders there could resolve the problem. They never got back to me again."

However, according to Abu Dahook, "The worst period was after the PA [Palestinian Authority] came. The Israelis started to harass us; they closed off more grazing lands than they had before. Second, the price of feed went up 400 percent. To make matters worse, the PA started to import sheep, which killed our market; we couldn't cover our expenses." He added that "the PA has not asked about the welfare of any of us. Slightly more than a year ago, we got PA officials here and told them about our situation. It costs a lot to hire lawyers; we would have to all chip in, everyone in a group [of tents] was considered a single case. The PA hasn't paid for a lawyer so far."

Abu Dahook said that his area was considered area C by the terms of the Oslo agreement: "A group of us met with the late Abu Ammar [Yasser Arafat]. So I asked him a question, and his response to me was, 'If you have a single reservation about Oslo, I have 500 reservations.' If the leadership that signed the agreement says this, what can I as an ordinary citizen do? Should I start a corrective movement within the revolution, do I fight the Israelis, what? When I heard that, I felt that I was finished, that I had been put in my grave while I am alive."

However, Abu Dahook and his family continued to resist the policies. "In solidarity, we joined the Jahalin families in their demonstrations against Ma'ale Adumim, which forced them to leave. A few well-known personalities came, but they didn't help; they just wanted to score points with the PA," he explained.

Continuing to destroy the land and the lives of its inhabitants

Israel's illegal construction of its wall on Palestinian land in the West Bank presented a new, but entirely consistent, threat to the Bedouins. While he said that he didn't know Israel's exact intentions behind the wall, Abu Dahook explained that "The wall is 300 meters away and will take 70 percent of the village lands away. It will join up with the other wall, and we'll be on the Palestinian side. We will stay here. If you are not directly in the path of the wall, Israel doesn't care where you are."

According to Abu Dahook, "In 2006, two men came to me, one was from the [Israeli] Civil Administration and one was the Border Guard. They said, you have to leave in two days. I asked whether they had an official expulsion order; I wanted a copy, so I could give it to my lawyer and he could check it out. He said, you have to leave; I'll bring the bulldozer. I said, I have 70 tents, and as soon as you destroy one, I'll erect another one. I asked, are these government lands or private property? Did the owners raise a court case against me to expel me, and you are coming to carry out the court order to expel me? If they did, give it to me in writing so that I can give it to my lawyer and he can explore the matter. And if these are state lands, then I am more entitled to state lands, because you took our land in 1948. And the state is obligated to take care of people. He went away, and I never saw him again."

Abu Dahook explained that "When Arab Jahalin were made to leave Abu Dis, each family was given a plot of land between 600 and 800 meters, depending on the size of the family as registered on the ID card, and they were given a building permit. They didn't get any cash. The government is obligated to settle us in housing, but this is not an alternative to my land. If the government doesn't want to find us a place to settle in, it should leave us alone and stop pushing us around. I will live in a tent as I please, just leave me alone. But giving me a plot of land now is no alternative to the land I had in 1948.

"Jerusalem is a capital for the whole area, and it is an important commercial market. As a result of the wall, people have been deprived of the market, there's no transportation, and you can't enter Jerusalem to sell your produce. There's no market in the PA areas. Right now, a ton of feed costs 2,000 shekels. If I want to sell a kilo of cheese in the West Bank, I have to sell it for 12 shekels. But when Jerusalem was open, I could sell it for 20 and 25 shekels. I have 100 sheep; if I sell half of then, I won't cover the expense of their feed."

Abu Dahook added that "I do not consider food rations to be assistance; it doesn't solve the problem. I told the PA that it should provide housing [collections of tents] in fallow land it owns. But no one is listening."

As Abu Dahook spoke about his history and the various assaults on Bedouin, he volunteered the inescapable conclusion that "our way of life is ending." He was referring to the Bedouin, pounded by the occupation, shrinking grazing lands and water resources, and the high cost of living. Without pastures to graze their livestock, some Bedouin were forced to seek employment in Israeli settlements. In truth, it is hard to imagine that any Palestinian community -- Bedouin, rural, or urban -- can be sustainable in the long run as long as Israel creates steadily worsening conditions and more oppressive facts on the ground.

Ida Audeh is a Palestinian from the West Bank who works as a technical editor in Boulder, Colorado. Her op-eds and articles have been published by the (Denver) Rocky Mountain News, the (Boulder) Daily Camera, The Electronic Intifada, Countercurrents, and Counterpunch. She can be reached at idaaudeh A T yahoo D O T com.


 


Leave A Comment
&
Share Your Insights

Comment Policy


 

Digg it! And spread the word!



Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So, as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.



 

Feed Burner
URL

Support Indy
Media

 

Search Our Archive

 



Our Site

Web