Bush's Speech
- An Interim Insult
Arsalan Tariq Iftikhar
Eleanor Roosevelt once said
Justice cannot be for one side alone. It must be for both sides.
Surrounded by the roses of his garden, President Bushs speech
made it quite evident and predictably clear that in the context of the
Holy Land, justice would not grace its elusive countenance on the beleaguered
women and children of Palestine today. On a day where many Israeli groups
went into raptures over the Presidents superb and
visionary address, the Palestinians and those who support
their plight, felt further marginalized by an administration that seems
to assign more value to an Israeli life than that of a Palestinian.
Terrorism is
to President Bush as Communism was to Senator McCarthy.
Since that fateful day in September, the word terrorism
has become this bloody maxim which strikes a painful reminder of the
North and South Towers crumbling into oblivion in New York. What fails
to reconcile itself to me is why the word terrorism is only
used for the Palestinians, but not for the Israelis. Prior to President
Bushs address, former Prime Minister Ehud Barak continuously used
the word terror to refer to the Palestinians. The President
followed suit a few minutes later by using the word terror
ten times in his address. Of those ten instances, how many times was
he referring to the Israelis? Not once.
According to Amnesty International,
in the first 408 days of the current Intifada, 570 Palestinians were
killed compared to 150 Israelis who died. Out of those figures, 150
Palestinian children were killed to Israels 30. Amnesty continues
to report that Israeli forces have killed Palestinians unlawfully
by shooting them during demonstrations and at checkpoints although lives
were not in danger. They have shelled residential areas and committed
extrajudicial executions
All Palestinians in the Occupied Territories
more than three million people have been collectively
punished. Almost every Palestinian town and village has been cut off
by Israeli army checkpoints or physical barriers. Curfews on Palestinian
areas have trapped residents in their homes for days, weeks or even
months. In the name of security, hundreds of Palestinian homes have
been demolished. Just going by Amnestys casualty count,
if President Bush used the word terror for Palestinians
ten times in his address, the number of associations between Israelis
and terror should have numbered around fifty.
But documented figures from
the preeminent international human rights organization aside, let us
get back to the transcript. Although the Israeli government is responsible
for five times as many murders as their Palestinian counterparts, the
condolences only went to Israel. The President looked somber as he emotionally
stated that he understood that Israelis have lived too long with
fear and funerals, having to avoid markets and public transportation,
and forced to put armed guards in kindergarten classrooms. Let
me state in the most categorical terms that I can, because it seems
that logic and reason have transcended much of our intelligentsia. Ariel
Sharon is as much of a terrorist as Yasser Arafat, if not five times
more.
That is saying quite a handful
given the fact that I really cannot stand Arafat either. I believe that
he has recently served as detriment to his people. If a suitable replacement
for Arafat would rise up from the ashes to uphold the democratic ideal
of the Palestinians, I would be their ardent supporter. Unfortunately,
President Bush has now created a scenario which is a non-starter. He
has called for the provisional state of Palestine, on the
condition that the terror ceases. Many were hoping that
he was referring to both the Israelis and the Palestinians, but unfortunately,
our held breath was knocked out of us yet again. He made Palestine reliant
on the heads of the Palestinian Authority and the militant Palestinian
groups carrying out terrorist attacks. By setting so many parameters,
he made it easy for this straw house to collapse. If the terrorists
do not approve of the Bush plan, all they have to do is commit an act
of terror to negate any potential formation of Palestine
on the Presidents terms.
Sharon has vowed not to withdraw
from the West Bank and Gaza until the terror ends. The Palestinian
zealots are smiling at Sharons covert invitation that allows them
to kill two birds with one stone. With another attack, they can prove
the Palestinian Authoritys ineffectiveness to the Palestinians,
while creating fear and havoc in Israeli life. I somberly conclude that
this mockery of a proposal may play right into the hands of the extreme
zealots, as opposed to tying those hands behind their backs.
I realize and concede that
there were some good proclamations in President Bushs speech.
However, I know that there will be a maelstrom of opinion pieces commending
the President for his visionary and courageous
address. I do note that this is the first time an American president
has ever called for an immediate creation of a Palestinian state, with
the same constitutional guarantees and legislative powers as any other
democracy in the world. Unfortunately, like the Israeli settlement policy,
there is too much swiss cheese in the Presidents proposal.
With so many holes and so little substance, it seems in many ways that
this process may fail even before it begins.
South African Archbishop
Desmond Tutu said in an interview last month that, "In our
struggle against apartheid, the great supporters were Jewish people
What is not so understandable, not justified, is what it did to another
people to guarantee its existence. I've been very deeply distressed
in my visit to the Holy Land; it reminded me so much of what happened
to us black people in South Africa. I have seen the humiliation of the
Palestinians at checkpoints and roadblocks, suffering like us when young
white police officers prevented us from moving about. My heart aches.
I say, Why are our memories so short?"
All we can do now is pray.
I gravely fear that this proposal has too many inherent flaws to succeed.
Although President Bush strongly empowered Israelis with his address
and weakly attempted to rectify the wrongs committed to the Palestinians,
the endgame will play into the hands of people like Ariel Sharon, Arafat
and terrorists from both sides. One wrong move will once again reinvent
the wheel; a wheel that has been stained with the blood of innocent
Israelis and with five times as much Palestinian blood.
(Arsalan Tariq Iftikhar is
a writer for the Independent Writers Syndicate. He attends Washington
University School of Law in St. Louis.)