F. William Engdahl's
Seeds Of Destruction - Part II
William Engdahl's book is a diabolical
account of how four Anglo-American agribusiness giants plan world domination
by patenting life forms to gain worldwide control of our food supply
and our lives. This review is in three in-depth parts. Part I was published
and is available on this web site. Part II follows below.
Launches the GMO Revolution
of the story go back decades, but Engdahl explains the science of "biological
and genetic-modification of plants and other life forms first"
came out of US research labs in the 1970s when no one noticed. They
soon would because the Reagan administration was determined to make
America dominant in this emerging field. The biotech agribusiness industry
was especially favored, and companies in the early 1980s raced to develop
GMO plants, livestock and GMO-based animal drugs. Washington made it
easy for them with an unregulated, business-friendly climate that persisted
ever since under Republicans and Democrats alike.
and public health issues aren't considered vital if they conflict with
profits. So the entire population is being used as lab rats for these
completely new, untested and potentially hazardous products. And leading
the effort to develop them is a company with a "long record of
fraud, cover-up, bribery," deceit and disdain for the public interest
product was saccharin that was later proved to be a carcinogen. It then
got into chemicals, plastics and became notorious for Agent Orange that
was used to defoliate Vietnam jungles in the 1960s and 1970s and exposed
hundreds of thousands of civilians and US troops to deadly dioxin, one
of the most toxic of all known compounds.
others in the industry, Monsanto is also a shameless polluter. It has
a history of secretly dumping some of the most lethal substances known
in water and soil and getting away with it. Today on its web site, however,
the company ignores its record and calls itself "an agricultural
company (applying) innovation and technology to help farmers around
the world be successful, produce healthier foods, better animal feeds
and more fiber, while also reducing agriculture's impact on our environment."
Engdahl proves otherwise in his thorough research that's covered below
of its past, Monsanto and other GMO giants got unregulated free rein
in the 1980s and especially after George HW Bush became president in
1989. His administration opened "Pandora's Box" so no "unnecessary
regulations would hamper them. Thereafter, "not one single new
regulatory law governing biotech or GMO products was passed then or
later (despite all the) unknown risks and possible health dangers."
In a totally
unfettered marketplace, foxes now guard the henhouse because the system
was made self-regulatory. An elder Bush Executive Order assured it.
It ruled GMO plants and foods were "substantially equivalent"
to ordinary ones of the same variety like corn, wheat or rice. This
established the principle of "substantial equivalence" as
the "lynchpin of the whole GMO revolution." It was pseudo-scientific
mumbo jumbo, but was now law, and Engdahl equated it to a potential
biologically catastrophic "Andromeda Strain," no longer the
world of science fiction.
chose milk as its first GMO product, genetically manipulated it with
recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH), and marketed it under the
trade name, Posilac. In 1993, the Clinton FDA declared it safe and approved
it for sale before any consumer use information was available. It's
now sold in every state and promoted as a way cows can produce up to
30% more milk. Problems, however, soon appeared. Farmers reported their
stock burned out up to two years sooner than usual, serious infections
developed, and some animals couldn't walk. Other problems included the
udder inflammation mastitis as well as deformed calves being born.
was suppressed, and rBGH milk is unlabeled so there's no way consumers
can know. They also weren't told this hormone causes leukemia and tumors
in rats, and a European Commission committee concluded humans drinking
rBGH milk risk breast and prostate cancer. The EU thus banned the product,
but not the US. Despite clear safety issues, the FDA failed to act and
allows hazardous milk to be sold below the radar. It was just the beginning.
The Fox Guards
the Pusztai affair, the toll it took on his health, and the modest vindication
he finally got. Already out of a job, the 300-year old British Royal
Society attacked him in 1999 and claimed his research was "flawed
in many aspects of design, execution and analysis and that no conclusions
should be drawn from it." It was another blow to a distinguished
man who deserved better than what Engdahl called a "recognizable
political smear" that also tarnished the Royal Society's credibility
for making it. It had no basis in fact and was done because Pusztai's
bombshell threatened to derail Britain's hugely profitable GMO industry
and do the same thing to its US counterpart.
As for Pusztai,
after five years, several heart attacks, and a ruined career, he finally
learned what happened after he announced his findings. Monsanto was
the culprit. The company complained to Clinton who, in turn, alerted
Tony Blair. Pusztai's findings had to be quashed and he discredited
for making them. He was nonetheless able to reply with the help of the
highly respected British scientific journal, The Lancet. In spite of
Royal Society threats against him, it's editor published his article,
but at a cost. After publication, the Society and biotech industry attacked
The Lancet for its action. It was a further shameless act.
As a footnote,
Pusztai now lectures around the world on his GMO research and is a consultant
to start-up groups researching the health effects of these foods. Along
with him and his wife, his co-author, Professor Stanley Ewen, also suffered.
He lost his position at the University of Aberdeen, and Engdahl notes
that the practice of suppressing unwanted truths and punishing whistleblowers
is the rule, not the exception. Industry demands are powerful, especially
when they affect the bottom line.
government went even further. It commissioned the private firm, Grainseed,
to conduct a three-year study to prove GMO food safety. London's Observer
newspaper later got UK Ministry of Agriculture documents on it that
showed tests were rigged and produced "some strange science."
At least one Grainseed researcher manipulated the data to "make
certain seeds in the trials appear to perform better than they really
the Ministry recommended a GMO corn variety be certified, and the Blair
government issued a new code of conduct under which "any employee
of a state-funded research institute who dared to speak out on (the)
findings into GMO plants could face dismissal, be sued for breach of
contract or face a court injunction." In other words, whisleblowing
was now illegal even if public health was at stake. Nothing would be
allowed to stop the agribusiness juggernaut from proceeding unimpeded.
Plan - "Tricky" Dick Nixon and Trickier Rockefellers
took office at a time of national crisis. Along with the Vietnam morass,
the economy was in trouble after the "golden age of capitalism"
peaked in 1965 and corporate profits were declining. The globalization
phenomenon began at this time when American companies and the nation's
wealthiest families found investing abroad more profitable than at home
because more opportunities were available outside the country.
one of them and was about to be renamed "agribusiness." Engdahl
called it "a paradigm shift" with one man having the most
decisive role - former New York governor Nelson Rockefeller "who
deeply wanted to be President" but had to settle for number two
under Gerald Ford.
He and his
brothers ran the family's Rockefeller Foundation and various other tax-exempt
entities like the Rockefeller Brothers Trust. Nelson and David were
the most influential figures, and their power center was the exclusive
New York Council on Foreign Relations. Engdahl states: "In the
1960s the Rockefellers were at the power center of the US establishment
(and) Secretary of State Henry Kissinger (was) their hand-picked protege."
It was a marriage made in hell.
"crisis of democracy" or as right wing Harvard professor,
Samuel Huntington, called it, an "excess of democracy" at
a time masses of ordinary citizens protested their government's policies.
It captured media attention, posed a threat to the country's establishment,
and had to be addressed. In 1973 it was at a meeting of 300 influential,
hand-picked Rockefeller friends from North America, Europe and Japan.
They founded a powerful new organization called the Trilateral Commission
with easily recognizable member names.
Brzezinski was its first Executive Director, and other charter members
included Jimmy Carter (who became David Rockefeller's favored 1976 presidential
candidate over Gerald Ford), George HW Bush, Paul Volker (Carter's Fed
Chairman) and Alan Greenspan who was then a Wall Street investment banker.
The new organization
"laid the basis for a new global strategy for a network of interlinked
international elites," many of whom were Rockefeller business partners.
Combined, their financial, economic and political clout was unmatched.
So was their ambition that George HW Bush later called a "new world
order." Trilateralists laid the foundation for today's globalization.
They also followed Huntington's advice about democracy's unreliability
that had to be checked by "some measure of (public) apathy and
non-involvement (combined with) secrecy and deception."
further advocated privatizing public enterprises along with deregulating
industry. Trilateralist Jimmy Carter embraced the dogma enthusiastically
as President. He began the process that Ronald Reagan continued in the
1980s almost without noticing its originator or placing blame where
Nixon was in office with Kissinger his Svengali. One observer described
him at the time as "like sludge out of a swamp without a spark
of life....no soul, a slip of life, a kind of ghoul (and) a sort of
lubricant (to keep the ship of state running)." So he did by "tak(ing)
complete control (of) US foreign policy" as both Secretary of State
and National Security Advisor. Further, he "was to make food a
centerpiece of his diplomacy along with oil geopolitics."
In the Cold
War era, food became a strategic weapon by masquerading as "Food
for Peace." It was cover for US agriculture to engineer the transformation
of family farming into global agribusiness with food the tool and small
farmers eliminated so it could be used most effectively. World agriculture
domination was to be "one of the central pillars of post-war Washington
policy, along with (controlling) world oil markets and non-communist
world defense sales." The defining 1973 event was a world food
of grain staples along with the first of two 1970s oil shocks advanced
a "significant new Washington policy turn." Oil and grains
were rising three to fourfold in price when the US was the world's largest
food surplus producer with the most power over prices and supply. It
was an ideal time for a new alliance between US-based grain trading
companies and the government. It "laid the groundwork for the later
Engdahl called the "great train robbery" with Kissinger the
culprit. He decided US agriculture policy was "too important to
be left in the hands of the Agriculture Department" so he took
control of it himself. The world desperately needed grain, America had
the greatest supply, and the scheme was to use this power to "radically
change world food markets and food trade." The big winners were
grain traders like Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and Continental
Grain that were helped by Kissinger's "new food diplomacy (to create)
a global agriculture market for the first time." Food would "reward
friends and punish enemies," and ties between Washington and business
lay at the heart of the strategy.
food market was being reorganized, corporate interests were favored,
political advantage was exploited, and the 1990s "gene revolution"
groundwork was laid. Rockefeller interests and its Foundation were to
play the decisive role as events unfolded over the next two decades.
It began under Nixon as the cornerstone of his farm policy, free trade
was the mantra, corporate grain traders were the beneficiaries, and
family farms had to go so agribusiness giants could take over.
them was the plan to remove an "excess (of) human resources."
Engdahl called it a "thinly veiled form of food imperialism"
as part of a scheme for the US to become "the world granary."
The family farm was to become the "factory farm," and agriculture
was to be "agribusiness" to be dominated by a few corporate
giants with incestuous ties to Washington.
was also part of the scheme under Nixon's New Economic Plan (NEP) that
included closing the gold window in 1971 to let the currency float freely.
Developing nations were targeted as well with the idea that they forget
about being food-sufficient in grains and beef, rely on America for
key commodities, and concentrate instead on small fruits, sugar and
vegetables for export. Earned foreign exchange could then buy US imports
and repay IMF and World Bank loans that create a never-ending cycle
of debt slavery. GATT was also used and later the WTO with corporate-written
rules for their own bottom line interests.
National Security Memo
In the midst
of a worldwide drought and stock market collapse, consider Henry Kissinger's
classified memo in April, 1974. It was on a secret project called National
Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) that was shaped by Rockefeller
interests and aimed to adopt a "world population plan of action"
for drastic global population control - meaning to reduce it. The US
led the effort, and it worked like this - it made birth control in developing
countries a prerequisite for US aid. Engdahl summed it up in blunt terms:
"if these inferior races get in the way of our securing ample,
cheap raw materials, then we must find ways to get rid of them."
scheme was "simpler contraceptive methods through bio-medical research"
that almost sounds like DuPont's old slogan, "Better things for
better living through chemistry." Later on, DuPont dropped "through
chemistry" as evidence mounted on their toxic effects and a changing
company in 1999 began using "The Miracles of Science" in their
advertising. The Nazis also aimed big and sought control. Population
culling was part of it that for them was called "eugenics"
and their scheme was to target "inferior" races to preserve
the "superior" one.
was along the same idea and was tied to the agribusiness agenda that
began with the 1950s and 1960s "Green Revolution" to control
food production in targeted Latin American, Asian and African countries.
Kissinger's plan had two aims - securing new US grain markets and population
control with 13 "unlucky" countries chosen. Among them were
India, Brazil, Nigeria, Mexico and Indonesia, and exploiting their resources
depended on drastic population reductions to reduce homegrown demand.
was ugly and pure Kissinger. It recommended forced population control
and other measures to ensure strategic US aims. Kissinger wanted global
numbers reduced by 500 million by the year 2000 and argued for doubling
the 10 million annual death rate to 20 million going forward. Engdahl
called it "genocide" according to the strict definition of
the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of Genocide statute that defines this crime legally. Kissinger was guilty
under it for wanting to withhold food aid to "people who can't
or won't control their population growth." In other words, if they
won't do it, we'll do it for them.
included fertility control called "family planning" that was
linked to the availability of key resources. The Rockefeller family
backed it, Kissinger was their "hired hand," and he was well-rewarded
for his efforts. It included keeping him from being prosecuted where
he's wanted as a war criminal and could be arrested overseas like Pinochet
was in the UK when he was placed under house arrest in 2006.
better-known crimes, consider what he did to poor Brazilian women through
a policy of mass sterilization under NSSM 200. After 14 years of the
program, the Brazilian Health Ministry discovered shocking reports of
an estimated 44% of all Brazilian women between ages 14 and 55 permanently
sterilized. Organizations like the International Planned Parenthood
Federation and Family Health International were involved, and USAID
directed the program. It has a long disturbing history backing US imperialism
while claiming on its web site it extends "a helping hand to those
people overseas struggling to make a better life, recover from a disaster
or striving to live in a free and democratic country."
disturbing was an estimated 90% of Brazilian women of African descent
sterilized in a nation with a black population second only to Nigeria's.
Powerful figures backed the scheme but none more influential than the
Rockefellers with John D. III having the most clout on population policy.
Nixon appointed him head of the Commission on Population Growth and
the American Future in 1969. Its earlier work laid the ground for Kissinger's
NSSM 200 and its policy of extermination through subterfuge that was
based on a "decades old effort to breed human traits" by the
Nazi "Eugenics" process.
Kissinger (and his assistant Brent Scowcroft) made population reduction
official US foreign policy, the Rockefellers were experimenting on humans.
JD III led the effort. In the 1950s, while Nelson exploited cheap Puerto
Rican labor in New York and on the island, brother JD III conducted
mass sterilization experiments on their women. By the mid-1960s, Puerto
Rico's Public Health Department estimated the toll - one-third or more
of them of child-bearing age (unsuspecting poor women) were permanently
JD III expressed
his views in a 1961 UN Food and Agriculture Organization lecture: "To
my mind, population growth (and its reduction) is second only to control
of atomic weapons as the paramount problem of the day." He meant,
of course, its unwanted parts to preserve valuable resources for the
privileged. He was also influenced by eugenicists, race theorists and
Malthusians at the Rockefeller Foundation who believed they had the
right to decide who lives or dies.
figures were behind the effort as well as leading American business
families. So were notables in the UK then and earlier like Winston Churchill,
John Maynard Keynes and others. Alan Gregg was as well as Rockefeller
Foundation Medical Division chief for 34 years. Consider his views.
He said "people pollute, so eliminate pollution by eliminating
(undesirable) people." He compared city slums to cancerous tumors
and called them "offensive to decency and beauty." Better
to remove them and cleanse the landscape.
policy, and it was "key to understanding (the Foundation's later
efforts) in the revolution in biotechnology and plant genetics."
Its mission from inception was to "(cull) the herd, or systematically
(reduce) populations of 'inferior breeds.' " The problem for supremacists
is too many of a lesser element spells trouble when they demand more
of what the privileged want for themselves. Solution - remove them with
lots of ways to do it from birth control to sterilization to starvation
to wars of extermination.
were American, they took root 100 years ago, noted names backed it like
Rockefeller, Carnegie and Harriman, and they later influenced the Nazis.
Hitler praised the practice in his 1924 book, "Mein Kampf,"
then used it as Fuhrer to breed a "master race." Supreme Court
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes also supported it, and consider his 1927
decision in Buck v. Bell. He ruled Virginia's forced sterilization program
was constitutional and wrote: "It is better for all the world,
if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime....society
can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three
generations of imbeciles are enough." This from a noted Supreme
Court Justice that would have horrific consequences still in play. It
"opened the floodgates" for sterilizing many thousands of
women considered "subhuman" detritus and in the way.
JD III was
right in step with this thinking. He was nurtured on Malthusian pseudo-science
and embraced the dogma. He joined the family Foundation in 1931 where
he was influenced by eugenicists like Raymond Fosdick and Frederick
Osborn. Both were founding members of the American Eugenics Society.
In 1952, he used his own funds to found the New York-based Population
Council in which he promoted studies on over-population dangers that
were openly racist. For the next 25 years, the Council spent $173 million
on global population reduction and became the world's most influential
organization promoting these supremacist ideas.
But it avoided
the term "eugenics" because of its Nazi association and instead
used language like birth control, family planning and free choice. It
was all the same, and before the war Rockefeller associate and family
Foundation board member, Frederick Osborn, enthusiastically supported
Nazi eugenics experiments that led to mass exterminations now vilified.
Back then, he believed this was the "most important experiment
that has ever been tried" and later wrote a book. It was called
"The Future of Human Heredity" with "eugenics" in
the subtitle. It stated women could be convinced to reduce their births
voluntarily and began substituting the term "genetics" for
the one now out of favor.
Cold War, culling the population drew supporters that included the cream
of corporate America. They backed private population reduction initiatives
like Margaret Sanger's International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF).
The major media also spread the notion that "over-population in
developing countries leads to hunger and more poverty (which, in turn,
becomes) the fertile breeding ground for" international communism.
American agribusiness would later get involved through a policy of global
food control. Food is power. When used to cull the population, it's
a weapon of mass destruction.
the current situation with the UN Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO) reporting sharply higher food prices along with severe shortages,
and warned this condition is extreme, unprecendented and threatens billions
with hunger and starvation. Prices are up 40% this year after a 9% rise
in 2006, and it forced developing states to pay 25% more for imported
food and be unable to afford enough of it.
for the problem are cited that include growing demand, higher fuel and
transportation costs, commodity speculation, the use of corn for ethanol
production (taking one-third of the harvest that's more than what's
exported for food) and extreme weather while ignoring the above implications
- the power of agribusiness to manipulate supply for greater profits
and "cull the herd" in targeted Third World countries. Affected
ones are poor, and FAO cites 20 in Africa, nine in Asia, six in Latin
America and two in Eastern Europe that in total represent 850 million
endangered people now suffering from chronic hunger and related poverty.
They depend on imports, and their diets rely heavily on the type grains
agribusiness controls - wheat, corn and rice plus soybeans. If current
prices stay high and shortages persist, millions will die - maybe by
and Peace Studies
how American elites in the late 1930s began planning an American century
in the post-war world - a "Pax Americana" to succeed the fading
British Empire. The New York Council of Foreign Relations War and Peace
Studies Group led the effort, and Rockefeller Foundation money financed
it. As Engdahl put it: they'd be paid back later "thousands-fold."
First though, America had to achieve world dominance militarily and
The US business
establishment envisioned a "Grand Area" to encompass most
of the world outside the communist bloc. To exploit it, they hid their
imperial designs beneath a "liberal and benevolent garb" by
defining themselves as "selfless advocates of freedom for colonial
peoples (and) the enemy of imperialism." They would also "champion
world peace through multinational control." Sound familiar?
it was just subterfuge for their real aims that were pursued under the
banner of the United Nations, the new Bretton Woods framework, the IMF,
World Bank and the GATT. They were established for one purpose - to
integrate the developing world into the US-dominated Global North so
its wealth could be transfered to powerful business interests, mostly
in the US. The Rockefeller family led the effort, the four brothers
were involved, and Nelson and David were the prime movers.
III was plotting depopulation and racial purity schemes, Nelson worked
"the other side of the fence....as a forward-looking international
businessman" in the 1950s and 1960s. While preaching greater efficiency
and production in targeted countries, he schemed, in fact, to open world
markets for unrestricted US grain imports. It became the "Green
on Latin America. During WW II, he coordinated US intelligence and covert
operations there, and those efforts laid the groundwork for family interests
post-war. They were tied to the region's military because friendly strongmen
are the type leaders we prefer to guarantee a favorable business climate.
1930s, Nelson Rockefeller had significant Latin American interests,
especially in areas of oil and banking. In the early 1940s, he sought
new opportunities and along with Laurance bought vast amounts of cheap,
high-quality farmland so the family could get into agriculture. It wasn't
for family farming, however. The Rockefellers wants global monopolies,
and their scheme was to do in agriculture what the family patriarch
did in oil along with using food and agricultural technology as Cold
PL 480, or "Food for Peace," established surplus food as a
US foreign policy tool, and Nelson used his considerable influence on
the State Department because every post-war Department Secretary, from
1952 through 1979, had ties to the family through its Foundation: namely,
John Foster Dulles, Dean Rusk, Henry Kissinger and Cyrus Vance.
supported Rockefeller views on private business and knew the family
saw agriculture the way it sees oil - commodities to be "traded,
controlled, (and) made scarce or plentiful" to suit the foreign
policy goals of dominant corporations controlling their trade.
got into agriculture in 1947 when Nelson founded the International Basic
Economy Corporation (IBEC). Through it, he introduced "mass-scale
agribusiness in countries where US dollars could buy huge influence
in the 1950s and 1960s." Nelson then allied with grain-trading
giant Cargill in Brazil where they began developing hybrid corn seed
varieties with big plans for them. They would make the country "the
world's third largest producer of (these) crop(s) after the US and China."
It was part of Rockefeller's "Green Revolution" that by the
late 1950s "was rapidly becoming a strategic US economic strategy
alongside oil and military hardware."
was the beginning of a food production revolution with big aims - to
control the "basic necessities of the majority of the world's population."
As agribusiness in the 1990s, it was "the perfect partner for the
introduction....of genetically engineered food crops or GMO plants."
This marriage masqueraded as "free market efficiency, modernization
(and) feeding a malnourished world." In fact, it was nothing of
the sort. It cleverly hid "the boldest coup over the destiny of
entire nations ever attempted."
Agribusiness - Rockefeller and Harvard Invent USA "Agribusiness"
Revolution began in Mexico and spread across Latin America during the
1950s and 1960s." It was then introduced in Asia, especially in
India. It was at a time we claimed our aim was to help the world through
free market efficiency. It was all one way, from them to us so corporate
investors could profit. It gave US chemical giants and major grain traders
new markets for their products. Agribusiness was going global, and Rockefeller
interests were in the vanguard helping industry globalization take shape.
with his brother, JD III, who set up his own Agriculture Development
Council in 1953. They shared a common goal - "cartelization of
world agriculture and food supplies under their corporate hegemony."
At its heart, it aimed to introduce modern agriculture techniques to
increase crop yields under the false claim of wanting to reduce hunger.
The same seduction was later used to promote the Gene Revolution with
Rockefeller interests and the same agribusiness giants backing it.
In the 1960s,
Lyndon Johnson also used food as a weapon. He wanted recipient nations
to agree to administration and Rockfeller preconditions that population
control and opening their markets to US industry was part of the deal.
It also involved training developing world agriculture scientists and
agronomists in the latest production concepts so they could apply them
at home. This "carefully constructed network later proved crucial"
to the Rockefeller strategy to "spread the use of genetically-engineered
crops around the world," helped along with USAID funding and CIA
Revolution" tactics were painful and took a devastating toll on
peasant farmers. They destroyed their livelihoods and forced them into
shantytown slums that now surround large Third World cities. There they
provide cheap exploitable labor from people desperate to survive and
easy prey for any way to do it.
also harmed the land. Monoculture displaces diversity, soil fertility
and crop yields decrease over time, and indiscriminate use of chemical
pesticides causes serious later health problems. Engdahl quoted an analyst
calling the "Green Revolution" a "chemical revolution"
developing states couldn't afford. That began the process of debt enslavement
from IMF, World Bank and private bank loans. Large landowners can afford
the latter. Small farmers can't and often, as a result, are bankrupted.
That, of course, is the whole idea.
Revolution" was based on the "proliferation of new hybrid
seeds in developing markets" that characteristically lack reproductive
capacity. Declining yields meant farmers had to buy seeds every year
from large multinational producers that control their parental seed
lines in house. A handful of company giants held patents on them and
used them to lay the groundwork for the later GMO revolution. Their
scheme was soon evident. Tradition farming had to give way to High Yield
Varieties (HYV) of hybrid wheat, corn and rice with major chemical inputs.
growth rates were impressive but not for long. In countries like India,
agricultural output slowed and fell. They were losers so agribusiness
giants could exploit large new markets for their chemicals, machinery
and other product inputs. It was the beginning of "agribusiness,"
and it went hand-in-hand with the "Green Revolution" strategy
that would later embrace plant genetic alterations.
Business School professors were involved early on - John Davis and Ray
Goldberg. They teamed with Russian economist, Wassily Leontief, got
Rockefeller and Ford Foundation funding, and initiated a four-decade
revolution to dominate the food industry. It was based on "vertical
integration" of the kind Congress outlawed when giant conglomerates
or trusts like Standard Oil used them to monopolize entire sectors of
key industries and crush competition.
It was revived
under Trilateralist President Jimmy Carter disguised as "deregulation"
to dismantle "decades of carefully constructed....health, food
safety and consumer protection laws." They would now give way under
a new wave of industry-friendly vertical integration. Supported by a
public campaign, it claimed that government was the problem, it encroached
too much on our lives, and it had to be rolled back for greater personal
the 1970s, agribusiness producers controlled US food supplies. They'd
now go global on a scale without precedent. The goal - "staggering
profits" by "restructur(ing) the way Americans grew food to
feed themselves and the world." Ronald Reagan continued Carter's
policy and let the top four or five monopoly players control it. It
led to an unprecedented "concentration and transformation of American
agriculture" with independent family farmers driven off their land
through forced sales and bankruptcies so "more efficient"
agribusiness giants could move in with "Factory Farms." Remaining
small producers became virtual serfs as "contract farmers."
America's landscape was changing with people trampled on for profits.
a gradual process of "wholesale merger(s) and consolidation....of
American food production....into giant corporate global concentrations"
with familiar names - Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), Smithfield
Foods and ConAgra. As they grew bigger, so did their bottom lines with
annual equity returns rising from 13% in 1993 to 23% in 1999. Hundreds
of thousands of small farmers lost out for it as their numbers dropped
by 300,000 from 1979 to 1998 alone. It was even worse for hog farmers
with a drop from 600,000 to 157,000 so 3% of producers could control
50% of the market.
costs were staggering and continue to be as "entire rural communities
collapsed and rural towns became ghost towns." Consider the consequences:
-- by 2004,
the four largest beef packers controlled 84% of steer and heifer slaughter
- Tyson, Cargill, Swift and National Beef Packing;
-- four giants
controlled 64% of hog production - Smithfield Foods, Tyson, Swift and
companies controlled 71% of soybean crushing - Cargill, ADM and Bunge;
giants controlled 63% of all flour milling, and five companies controlled
90% of global grain trade;
-- four other
companies controlled 89% of the breakfast cereal market - Kellogg, General
Mills, Kraft Foods and Quaker Oats;
-- in 1998,
Cargill acquired Continental Grain to control 40% of national grain
-- four large
agro-chemical/seed giants controlled over 75% of the nation's seed corn
sales and 60% of it for soybeans while also having the largest share
of the agricultural chemical market - Monsanto, Novartis, Dow Chemical
and DuPont; six companies controlled three-fourths of the global pesticides
and DuPont controlled 60% of the US corn and soybean seed market - all
of it patented GMO seeds; and
-- 10 large
food retailers controlled $649 billion in global sales in 2002, and
the top 30 food retailers account for one-third of global grocery sales.
At the dawn
of a new century, family farming was decimated by corporate agribusiness'
vertically integrated powers that surpassed their earlier 1920s heyday
dominance. The industry was now the second most profitable national
one after pharmaceuticals with domestic annual sales exceeding $400
billion. The next aim was merging Big Pharma with Big food producing
giants, and the Pentagon's National Defense University took note in
a 2003-issued paper - "Agribusiness (now) is to the United States
what oil is to the Middle East." It's now considered a "strategic
weapon in the arsenal of the world's only superpower," but at a
huge cost to consumers everywhere.
the "revolution" in animal factory production that EarthSave
International founder and Baskin-Robbins heir, John Robbins, covered
honestly, thoroughly and compassionately in two explosive books on the
subject - "Diet for A New America" in 1987 and "The Food
Revolution" in 2001. They were both stinging indictments of corporate-produced
foods - horrifying animal cruelty, unsafe foods, unsanitary conditions,
rampant use of anti-biotics humans then ingest, massive environmental
pollution, and new unknown dangers from genetic engineering - all allowed
by supposed government watchdog regulatory agencies that ignore public
was on a roll, government supports it with tens of billions in annual
subsidies, and the 1996 Farm Bill suspended the Secretary of Agriculture's
power to balance supply and demand so henceforth unrestricted production
is allowed. Food producing giants took full advantage to control market
forces. They crushed family farmers by over-producing and forcing down
prices. They also pressured land values as small operators failed. It
created opportunities for land acquisition on the cheap for greater
concentration and dominance.
integrating the Gene Revolution into agribusiness the way Harvard's
Ray Goldberg saw it coming. Entire new sectors were to be created from
genetic engineering. It would include GMO drugs from GMO plants in a
new "argi-ceutical system." Goldberg predicted a "genetic
revolution (through) an industrial convergence of food, health, medicine,
fiber and energy businesses" - in a totally unregulated marketplace.
Unmentioned was a threatening consumer nightmare hidden from view.
Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen
to The Steve Lendman News and Information Hour on The MicroEffect.com
Mondays at noon US Central time.
Share Your Insights
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.