Subscribe

Popularise CC

Join News Letter

Read CC In Your
Own Language

Editor's Picks

Mumbai Terror

Financial Crisis

Iraq

AfPak War

Peak Oil

Alternative Energy

Climate Change

US Imperialism

US Elections

Palestine

Latin America

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Globalisation

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Book Review

Gujarat Pogrom

WSF

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

Submission Policy

About CC

Disclaimer

Fair Use Notice

Contact Us

Subscribe To Our
News Letter

Name: E-mail:

Printer Friendly Version

Toxic Habit

By Case Wagenvoord

26 January, 2010
Countercurrents.org

History is chaos upon which an arbitrary narrative has been imposed. And African proverb tells us that until lions have their historians, tales of the hunt shall always glorify the hunter. In truth, the past is habit run amok until it hits a wall and a new habit is born. The narrative that is imposed on this chaos is a post hoc rationalization of the toxic momentum that rolls over all in its path.

So when John Feffer tells us that “Barack Obama demonstrated that he, too, cannot step outside of history,” he is telling us that Obama has been swept up by the collective habit that drives the Beltway. It is an ugly habit that leaves dead women and children in its wake. This is why leadership is so often an exercise is sociopathic behavior. A decent leader, seeing clearly the consequences of his actions would cringe in revulsion.

Historical narratives are always written on thick paper so the blood of the victims cannot soak through. History is the shroud in which the victims are buried. History sanitizes and sprinkles perfume on the stench left in habit’s wake. So it is that then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (The same Albright who said of the half million Iraqi children who were victims of our draconian sanctions, “It was worth it!”) could call the United States and “indispensable nation.”

Feffer cites Obama’s Oslo speech as an example of whitewashing a dung pile. Obama proudly proclaimed that, “Wars are morally justified…if they are conducted in self-defense or as a last resort if the force employed is proportional, and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared violence.”

Feffer then proceeds to make mincemeat of Obama’s argument by pointing out that:

“The problem with the president’s interpretation of just-war theory is that the conflict in Afghanistan—the issue that most threatens to undercut the legitimacy of the [Nobel Peace] prize—doesn’t fit the bill. It is difficult to claim that war is still in self-defense, not when the Taliban pose no threat to the United States and al-Qaeda has been reduced to a few fragments that could relocate elsewhere. The force is far from proportional, given that the most powerful country in the world is bombing one of the poorest. And civilians have surely not been spared violence.”

History turns deadly when its momentum is treated as destiny, and momentum always sails into destiny’s harbor on a ship built of lies. (One of the biggest is that the United States is a “military superpower.” If we’re such a superpower, why haven’t we won a war since World War II? Sure, we have more military hardware than anyone else, but most of it is useless in the counter insurgency wars we are fighting.)

The truth is that Obama is as much of a prisoner of momentum as his predecessors. He has fallen into a raging torrent that will sweep the country along until it is reduced to a trickle. Some call it history; others call it madness.

Case Wagenvoord blogs at http://belacquajones.blogspot.com and welcomes comments at [email protected].


 


Leave A Comment
&
Share Your Insights

Comment Policy

Fair Use Notice


 

Share This Article



Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands of people more. You just share it on your favourite social networking site. You can also email the article from here.



Disclaimer

 

Subscribe

Feed Burner

Twitter

Face Book

CC on Mobile

Editor's Picks

 

Search Our Archive

 



Our Site

Web