Another
Day, Another Outrage
By Phil Reeves
and Leonard Doyle
Independent
19 May 2003
The attacks themselves are no surprise; international observers had
been expecting an Islamist backlash after the American-led invasion
and occupation of Iraq. But the ferocity and frequency has been shocking.
And yesterday there were still more.
The wave of suicide attacks
in an arc that stretches from Morocco and Algeria through Israel
where seven were killed yesterday to Saudi Arabia, Chechnya and
Pakistan have been mounted by different violent groups for different
reasons. Yet they stand as testimony to the inaccuracy of President
George Bush's view that America is winning the "war on terror".
They also fortify the position of those who say the war in Iraq was
not so much part of that war as a diversion from it and that it
has fuelled anti-Western attacks rather than reduced them.
And despite the arrest of
four men in Saudi Arabia yesterday, the authorities in Riyadh admit
that the masterminds of last Monday's bomb attacks are still on the
loose.
Only days ago, Mr Bush declared
that "al-Qa'ida is on the run" and that "about half of
all the top al-Qa'ida operatives are either jailed or dead". In
either case, he said, "they are not a problem any more".
Yet they are a problem. Some
of their elements may have been badly dented by the US campaign against
them, notably in Afghanistan. But last week's calculated and carefully
planned anti-Western attacks, coupled with a new alleged tape from Osama
bin Laden, have proved that they are still in business, and that significant
numbers of their operatives are willing to destroy themselves in the
name of their beliefs.
Some Democrats in the US
are now taking up the issue in a surprisingly bold manner, given the
huge support that Americans gave Mr Bush during the war on Iraq. They
are asking: why did America go to war against Iraq when the war on al-Qa'ida
was clearly of more importance?
The presidential candidate
Senator Bob Graham of Florida spelt it out this weekend: "What
this administration has done is they have conducted an ideological war
in Iraq where they have not found the weapons of mass destruction upon
which it was predicated and at the same time they have stopped the war
against terror. We have let al-Qa'ida off the hook.''
Suicide bombers were in action
again yesterday. This time it was an attack by Hamas, the most militant
of the Palestinian nationalist-Islamist groups.
It came in response to the
latest attempted negotiations between the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel
Sharon, and the new Palestinian Prime Minister, Mahmoud Abbas, over
the doomed "road-map" and after yet another rash of Palestinian
deaths at the hands of Israeli forces.
This was nothing to do with
al-Qa'ida, nor was it about Iraq. But the rising temperature in the
occupied territories cannot be excluded from the broader picture, not
least because the US and British occupation of Iraq is certain to have
deepened the conviction among fanatical Islamist anti-American militant
groups of their own righteousness.
The sequence of yesterday's
events was as familiar as it was revolting: disguised as an Orthodox
Jew, a suicide bomber boarded a bus in central Jerusalem as the morning
rush hour was getting under way. Seven passengers were killed. A second
bomber blew himself up on the city's outskirts.
Israel imposed a "general
closure" on the West Bank last night. The Israeli army said "Palestinians
will not be allowed to exit and enter the territory of the state of
Israel".
Hours before the attacks,
talks between Mr Sharon and Mr Abbas the first between Israeli
and Palestinian leaders in three years had ended. It was another
addition to the list of problems confronting Mr Bush and his policy
makers.
This list is lengthening.
The aftermath of the war in Iraq has proved much harder than they expected.
US efforts to turn the interim administration in Afghanistan into a
national government with functioning security forces appear to be stalled,
having been undermined by guerrilla attacks.
Saudi Arabia's arrests of
suspects in the Riyadh suicide attacks a week ago was followed by the
embarrassing admission that an earlier botched raid in which 19 suspects
escaped was linked to the Riyadh bombing.
In Morocco, several dozen
militants allegedly linked to the Casablanca bombings were said to have
been detained. But the outlook is bleak, and likely to worsen.
Before the war on Iraq the
Egyptian President, Hosni Mubarak, predicted that it would encourage
global terrorism. "If there is one Bin Laden now," he said,
"there will be 100 Bin Ladens afterwards."
Those words will have been
ringing in the ears of the US Secretary of State, Colin Powell, who
landed in Saudi Arabia hours before the bombings and toured the devastated
site of one of the attacks.
By the time he had flown
on to Moscow to meet the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, the second
of two devastating suicide bombings in the Russian republic of Chechnya
had taken place. Wednesday's attack by a female suicide bomber added
17 victims to the 60 people who died when a truck bomb exploded in the
north of the country on Monday.
Even before Mr Powell's round
of diplomacy aimed at getting a United Nations figleaf of support
for the occupation of Iraq had ended, the bombers had attacked
in Morocco.