Tasini
Campaign Wasted
By Joshua Frank
21 September, 2006
Countercurrents.org
There
are plenty of reasons the Democrats continue to support the ongoing
occupation of Iraq. Not only did they authorize the war, they continue
to sit on their hands while our armed forces commit murder in the name
of democracy in Haditha.
Perhaps the worst of the
Democrats still embracing the illegal Bush wars is Senator Hillary Clinton.
And despite her unwillingness to engage the antiwar community, she still
receives substantial support from those who say they don’t support
the war.
On June 3 Clinton won the
coveted ballot line of the Working Families Party in New York, even
though the WFP was one of the first to oppose the war on Iraq four years
ago. It was a sign of what’s to come as Hillary sets herself up
for a presidential run in two years, where alleged antiwar groups like
MoveOn.org will likely rush to defend Hillary against a Republican challenger,
despite her deadly foreign policy positions. But let’s hope Hillary
never makes it that far.
Capitulation, like the WFP’s
last week, only serves to make Hillary worse than she already is. Not
that the Democrats will ever come out in opposition to the Iraq war,
but they surely aren’t going to do so as long as the antiwar community
supports them simply because they aren’t Republicans. And the
WFP even had a legitimate alternative in Jonathan Tasini, the Democratic
antiwar challenger to Hillary Clinton.
Tasini has come head-to-head
with the Democratic elite in his efforts to hold Clinton accountable
for her depraved war stance. Late last month at the New York Democrat’s
state convention, Tasini failed to introduce an antiwar resolution that
would have called for an immediate withdrawal of US troops from Iraq.
His party wouldn’t
hear it. Democratic officials said Tasini hadn’t followed the
rules by introducing the resolution fifteen days in advance. Tasini
contends he was misinformed and insists that Clinton’s camp was
behind the sabotage.
"There is absolutely
no question Hillary Clinton doesn't want a debate on the war,"
says Tasini.
At the same convention Clinton
snobbishly accepted her party’s nomination, and ignored Tasini’s
potential challenge -- “potential”, because Tasini is not
guaranteed a spot on the Democrat’s primary ballot in September.
His campaign still needs to turn in 15,000 signatures from registered
New York Democrats before his name will appear on the ballot. If he
fails to do so, his campaign will be over.
That’s the futility
of running antiwar campaigns in Democratic primaries against party elites
like Hillary Clinton. Besides, only Democrats in New York can vote in
the primaries, which in this case would ignore the fact that the antiwar
movement consists of much more than just Democrats.
But that’s how the
Democrats stifle debate. Instead of addressing the issue they’ll
silence those who aren’t in line with their positions, like Tasini.
And that raises the question: why even run antiwar campaigns inside
the Democratic Party?
If the antiwar movement were
savvy they’d be thinking ahead to Hillary Clinton’s expected
run for president in 2008. They’d be putting pressure on the Senator
now from outside the party, instead of waiting until more bodies in
Iraq pile up and more tax dollars are spent on slaughtering innocent
civilians. The antiwar movement shouldn’t be supporting Democrats.
Period. The primaries, as Tasini’s campaign has experienced (as
well as Dennis Kucinich in 2004), are rigged in favor of the establishment.
The truth is, Democrats and
Republicans aren’t going to end this war. We will, by refusing
to play by their rules.