A Summary Execution
By Celso Amorin
30 September ,
2005
The Guardian
I
can understand the shock the July bombings caused in Britain. I have
lived in London, and we want to show solidarity in the fight against
terror. But in Brazil we were also shocked that an innocent Brazilian
could be mistaken for a terrorist and shot dead by the police. I want
to avoid strong words, but this was a tragic mistake, to say the least.
It was a case of summary execution of the wrong person.
Even when you are
dealing with someone accused of a crime, that person has a right to
defend his or her case before the law. Jean de Menezes was not even
accused of anything - he was simply the wrong man.
I don't want to
pass judgment on how the police acted. I hope the results of the independent
commission will explain to us what happened. Perhaps it is the police's
method that should be questioned. We owe it to the cause of human rights
to ensure that we do not attack the innocent, otherwise we will be helping
the terrorists, who want to create a climate of insecurity. Now peaceful
citizens are not only afraid of suicide bombs, but also of the police.
Jack Straw said
that since terrorism is becoming international, the norms also have
to be international. I understand the rules of engagement in the Menezes
case have never been discussed anywhere else. I am not saying it is
not the sovereign right of the UK to establish its rules of engagement.
But for authentic cooperation, we will have to discuss them as well.
I hope we will continue
to have a dialogue, and that the Menezes family will be adequately assisted.
There is the question of the financial reparations the British government
owes the family, and the question of moral reparations also concerns
the Brazilian nation. These reparations will only be final when this
action is condemned. You cannot close the case until there is a full
investigation. If court action needs to be taken, then that has to happen.
We have to work
on how to address terrorism without endangering human rights. Brazil's
own situation is far from perfect, and many police officers have been
jailed recently, in Rio de Janeiro especially. Brazil is still a developing
country and as a result things sometimes happen which should not happen.
The government is trying to improve matters, and one thing it has done
for some time is to have an open and transparent policy on human rights.
I hope the coverage of Brazil that appeared in British tabloids is not
used as an excuse by those who committed this killing.
It is in this wider
context of human rights that we, along with other developing countries,
are demanding a voice on the United Nations security council for those
who don't see every single problem in the world in terms of security
alone. A reinforced UN body for human rights needs to address human
rights in the wider world. It should not only be developing nations
that are on trial. At present there are cases that are discussed because
they are in the interest of some powers, while others are ignored because
it is not in their interests. It is a question of everyone having the
same standards. Brazil has many problems, but we have invited human
rights reporters to investigate and recommend changes. I believe our
human rights record is improving. We hope all countries can do the same.
We are realistic
- we know the UN cannot be reformed overnight. But we are trying to
create a balance between developing and developed countries. It will
not be the ideal balance, because the security council's permanent five
members will continue to have the power of veto. A complete overhaul
of the UN would require another world war. Thankfully that won't happen,
so we must improve it gradually.
· Celso Amorin
is Brazil's foreign minister; he was interviewed by Hilary Wainwright
[email protected]
Guardian Unlimited
© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2005