Running
Out Fossil Fuels:
A Cause For Glee?
By Emily Spence
30 July, 2007
Countercurrents.org
John James, one of the writers
for Crisis Coalition, Incorporated (http://www.planetextinction.com/)
suggests, "It may be that declining oil may save us from climate
change. As you know from my Proof article [http://planetextinction.com/documents/Proof.pdf],
1.5 degrees is inevitable, and in another four years -- two degrees.
Were oil to decline in that time span, we may yet survive. Just as emissions
are rising three times faster than a decade ago, so oil consumption
is increasing."
Indeed, it does seem that the Earth will run out of oil, natural gas
and coal much more quickly than was, originally, anticipated by researchers
keeping track of overall expenditure of these resources [1]. At the
same time, others warn that any expectation of nuclear power taking
over as an effective substitute is both unrealistic and, potentially,
ruinous [2].
On other grounds, ethanol can't work either [3]. Meanwhile, wind, solar
and hydro provisions won't be sufficient in and by themselves. In addition,
what sort of work will people - the billions making their livings in
industries related to airlines, cruise lines, mechanized workshops and
factories producing oil based products such as plastic items and fertilizers
-- do since their jobs are dependent on the use of huge amounts of petroleum?
Yes, what will they all do once it all but disappears?
In the same vein, our high rate of agricultural yield, medical care,
transportation of the basic goods needed to sustain life, home heating
and cooling, travel related to school and work, as well as so much more
constituting "our way of life" are all, directly and indirectly,
reliant on fossil fuels. Likewise, many diverse industries require huge
energy inputs for the production of a voluminous and diverse assortment
of wares on which most people have come to depend. Therefore, it is
ill-fated that most of our electricity derives from coal, gas and oil.
For example, 68 % of the electricity in the US is provided by these
power sources [4] and nothing yet found by scientists can adequately
replace them without disastrous results.
Meanwhile, imagine any vast city, with its dense population, trying
to survive without all of the diesel guzzling trucks, trains, ships
and jets constantly bringing in an endless stream of food, drugs, clothes,
etc., to various points accessible to the millions of occupants living
within the metropolitan confines. Imagine manufacturers trying to provide
enough necessary (as opposed to frivolous) products, such as cans for
preserved food, without the inordinate amount of energy that is, currently,
being used in their creation. Imagine police, fire, school and hospital
departments trying to run without electrical power. Imagine the seemingly
endless miles and miles of farms across the globe trying to operate
without the provision of manmade herbicides and pesticides (developed
out of oil), as well as devoid of their gargantuan planting and culling
machinery.
If we had small self-sustaining communities across the world fulfilling
most basic needs locally, our dependence on fossil fuels would not be
such a daunting issue. Needed adjustment (weaning away from our heavy
addiction) could transpire more easily. However, our complex lifestyles
and ever booming population necessitate increasing amounts of energy
to be sustained.
Especially this is so with the ways that our capitalistic system and
transnational economics are configured so as to obtain cheap raw materials
in one location, low wage labor in a second and high paying purchasers
in a third with the goal in mind to always provide ever more consumables
to ensure ever great profit for corporate heads and stock holders. In
other words, our customs and standards of living are, literally, bringing
us ever closer to a pending downfall.
This in mind, what a horrible mess that our species has gotten itself
into and without a really good way out! All the same, "Mother Nature,"
ultimately, does have a solution to our predicament, albeit a devastating
one.
In this vein, it will, likely, lead to the most rapacious members of
humankind (the ones who've always garnered the most power, resources
and money for themselves) making out just fine, as always. Their kind
-- comprising of corporate moguls, certain government leaders appropriating
benefits from war mongering activities and others of their ilk -- nearly
always find a way to flourish in spite of surrounding adversity.
From an evolutionary standpoint, this sort of outcome always is the
case regardless of whether we find this pattern morally repugnant and
outrageous or not. Survival of the fittest always has meant that those
most successful at taking "the lion's share" most often thrive
regardless of whatever happens to everything and everyone else.
Yet despite the many severe daunting problems that the rest of us will,
obviously, face due to the decreasing supply of fossil fuels, the benefits
from running out of them, certainly, could include curtailment of global
warming effects. All the same, it does not seem that their disappearance
will provide any welcomed panacea for humanity's collective and looming
woes [5].
In part, this is because many diverse environments across the globe
are staggering under the influence of weather changes already having
taken place from the rising heat. Our species and other ones are already
at risk from the nearly universal threat of drought, crop reduction
[6], ever more powerful hurricanes, wild floods, spreading fires, vastly
expanding desert regions, rising oceans and other awful impacts. Meanwhile,
they're slated to get worse.
Even the outcomes that are not so thoroughly daunting are bad. As Jean-Louis
Robert Turcot, a naturalist in Canada, notes, "In terms of the
global warming scenarios that are becoming more and more evident as
time goes on, I witnessed a small part of it just yesterday in a remote
fishing lake which I, occasionally, visit. The Pine Beetle [Dendroctonus
ponderosae], which is usually controlled by spells of cold winter weather,
are devastating forests of British Columbia and about twenty-five percent
of the trees that line the lake are now red, killed by the insect infestation,
with predictions of a ninety percent kill ratio. I felt for the time
in my heart that nature was truly being affected, even though these
trees were far removed from humanity and I did feel a moment of deep
sadness..."
Indeed, one can notice lots of changes in many locales in terms of a
variety of destabilizing factors. Perhaps if these came only singularly
to individual species, the results, in some instances, wouldn't be so
severe. However, they, en masse, create far-reaching problems. As such,
there is just too much with which to simultaneously deal.
For example, Eurasian Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), a non-indigenous
plant life with no easy local means for curtailment, thrives in acidic,
carbon rich waterways (such as US lakes have become due to their containing
acid rain and serving as carbon sinks). With such favorable growth conditions
provided, it is, literally, choking the life out of many water systems
across America.
Combined with further negatives, such as higher water temperatures and
other factors, many aquatic species are shrinking in numbers or altogether
perishing. In short, the noxious Milfoil, co-joined with other impingements,
is destroying much submerged life on which many other life forms depend.
Hence, whole interactive systems are vanishing underwater AND around
shores. Moreover, further organisms, ones reliant on the shore life
for their sustenance, are similarly being decimated and so on down the
line.
Summed up, the resultant changes, in turn, punch holes in the food web,
which creates further problems due to natural environments being largely
interdependent in complex ways. As a result, whole immense bionetworks
are falling like intersecting arrays of dominoes wherein each bar pushes
another one or two down, which does the same to further ones in a branching
system. In this manner, many eco-niches are, slowly, failing across
the planet.
Another example, this one on land, concerns the white birch. Due to
ozone layer thinness, they have grown spindly and are not developing
thick trunks. (I was told that this was the reason when I asked a forest
ranger to whom I mentioned that I'd noticed the change.) As a result,
many of them have tall spaghetti-like branches that, when they get top
heavy with leaves, snap in half. Losing a few branches this way, in
and of itself, might not pose a problem. Yet, with the huge openings
in the surface of the birch due to breakage, all sorts of organisms
have easy entrance and finish the trees off in combination with their
weakened state due to drought and delimited sustenance from photosynthesis
caused by the massive leaf loss. As such, I have seen huge stands, covering
many acres, with approximately ninety percent dead birch resultant from
this ugly occurrence.
While these accounts involve observation and are merely anecdotal, one
can be sure that many other species are experiencing similar difficulties
due to a variety of intersecting causes, that, both directly and indirectly,
create problems for yet further species one after another in a cascading
array.
All considered, how much will have to be missing from the overall complex
matrix before a tipping point is reached so that many environments become
unable to foster much life, including human existence? Where would people
go when all the good places left have already been overrun by everyone
else having the same idea of migrating to the last locations capable
of supporting survival?
As John Muir, the environmentalist, suggested around a hundred years
ago, "Tug on anything at all and you'll find it connected to everything
else in the universe.” He, also, predicted, “Brought into
right relationships with the wilderness, man would see that his appropriation
of Earth's resources beyond his personal needs would only bring imbalance
and begat ultimate loss and poverty by all." How unfortunate that
his peers -- our forebears -- never earnestly heeded his words. However,
it may not be too late for us to do so. Accordingly, we must, with greatest
determination, try!
[1] Please refer to: http://www.powerswitch.org.uk/
portal/index.php, Oil
and gas may run short by 2015, say industry experts ... (http://environment.independent.co.uk/
climate_change/article2790960.ece), A
Crude Awakening:
The Oil Crash (2006) ( www.imdb.com/title/tt0776794/)
and Crude (www.crudemovie.net/).
[2} Accounts of the non-viability are provided at: SteveLendmanBlog:
Resource Wars - Can We Survive Them? (sjlendman.blogspot.com/2007/06/resource-wars-can...),
Nuclear
Power is Not the Answer to Global Warming or Anythin... (www.mup.unimelb.edu.au/catalogue/0-522-85251-3.h),
Why
Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer (www.commondreams.org/views05/0509-22.htm)
and Friends
of the Earth: Press Releases: Why nuclear power is n... (www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/why_nuclea
).
[3] Excellent analyses is offered at:
http://203.99.65.121/section/2/story.cfm?c_id=2&
objectid=10450519&pnum=0 and The Coming Biofuels Disaster -
CommonDreams.org (www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/06/28/2153/).
[4] An overview is located at: Where Does Electricity Come From? - Environmental
Defense (http://www.environmentaldefense.org/
article.cfm?contentID=774).
[5] Two different types of summaries of the most pressing global difficulties
can be found at: World Revolution : The State of the World (BriefVersion)
(http://www.worldrevolution.org/projects/
globalissuesoverview/overview2/BriefOverview.htm) and Encyclopedia of
World Problems and Human Potential Project: ... (www.uia.org/encyclop/15sign.htm).
[6] The problem is well described at: globeandmail.com: How global warming
goes against the grain (www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.2007),
Environmental Degradation and Hunger - Social and Economic P... (www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/hunger/environment/)
and Cornell News: Climate-change disease (www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Feb00/AAAS.Pimente).
Emily Spence lives in Massachusetts and deeply cares about the future
of our world.
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.