Israeli Sins
And Jewish Redemption
By Issa Khalaf
Information Clearing House
11 June, 2003
At the ripe old age of nineteen,
in the summer preceding my junior year at university, I had a mission.
Driven by youthful idealism, I read all I could on the Holocaust with
the intention of writing a book. I needed to understand this event,
if for no other reason than to glimpse the possibilities for Palestinian-Israeli
coexistence. At summers end, some twenty books and articles later,
I wrote my book, titled Mans Inhumanity to Man,
one hundred pages of synthesis and summary really, of the Holocaust.
It was my brief encounter with a part of Jewish history.
Several years ago, my wife,
two children in their early teens, and myself watched on video Steven
Spielbergs Schindlers List. At films end,
my son and daughter were outraged and horrified, wondering why and how
this could be allowed to happen.
We are a Palestinian-American
family, I having left my native Ramallah for the US at the age of eight.
Our reactions to injustice and barbarity were visceral, a characteristic
of all humans whose ultimate wellspring, I believe, is a universal divine
source. We cant understand others suffering; we can only
feel it. Here I am, numb at the unfolding calamity of the Palestinian
people, my children wondering how and why the Palestinians torment
and dispossession could be allowed to happen, writing with forlorn hope
that Israelis would hear and listen.
I know, striking at our innermost
vulnerability, there is nothing more primeval than terror in stirring
a frenzied reaction of existential fear, hate and violence, of profound
personal loss, perpetuating Israelis deep-rooted sense of siege
and suffocation, silencing all but the most intrepid voices of reason.
I know, too, the humiliation and degradation, the organized physical,
cultural, economic, and psychological violence and terror, the massive
violations of human rights, committed by the Israeli state against the
Palestinian civil population, giving rise to the nihilist despair that
is the suicide bomber.
Disturbing is the silence
in Israel, the apparent lack of self-awareness, of a chronic Jewish
incapacity to emerge from self-absorption. How is it that the experience
of death and desolation in the Holocaust, the great Jewish redemptive
tradition of justice, has not propelled more, far more, Israelis to
speak up on the treatment of the Palestinians? Do Israelis even know,
or care, about the full extent of the outrage? Perhaps there is something
deeper with historic lineage here, that of the dark side of the Zionist
encounter with the indigenous Palestinians, the one that refused to
acknowledge their existence or treat them with anything but cruelty
and disdain.
Certainly the self-image
of an Israel forever pursuing peace while its enemies wished only to
destroy it is comforting. But this is not true, not in its absolute
formulation. Israeli leaders have also used war for territorial aggrandizement
even when their neighbors were not a threat and actually pursued peace.
From Ben-Gurion onwards such leaders have been clever in manipulating
the existential fears of an unquestioning Israeli population. Surely
militarism and war, accompanied by dehumanization of the Palestinians
and degradation of Jewish values, and certainly of the soldier, have
become deeply embedded in Israeli culture and society, finding their
ultimate logic in Mr. Sharons solution: absolute violence.
Israelis have gotten their
state, their flag, their army, their national anthem, and their nuclear
weapons. Where is Sharon going at such a frenetic pace, expropriating
land, constructing a Wall, not along the green line but at many points
deep inside the West Bank? Will Zionism forever remain in a state of
ideological creation, its raison detre, thus existing in a continual
state of expansionist justifications? Will this momentum not come to
rest until all of Palestine is annexed and Palestinians expelled? If
not genuine independence and sovereignty for the Palestinians in the
occupied territories, what? Expulsions into Jordanan option
openly talked about throughout Israeland decades of more war with
Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims?
The solutions essentials
are easy: evacuation of the territories with minor territorial adjustments
and guarantees of Israeli and Palestinian security, including an unarmed
Palestine, and the sharing of Jerusalem. Getting there is impossible,
however, for I, as a Palestinian, see what most Israelis do not: the
states ideological momentum has not yet arrived at inertia, its
appetite for all of historic Palestine not yet whetted.
And this is the heart of
the matter. Israel has remained in a stagnant territorially and ethnically
voracious nationalism, rejecting the more humanistic and liberal voices
of Jewish national renaissance represented by historic figures such
as Ahad Haam, Nahum Goldmann, or Judah Magnus. Wars of subjugation,
of extirpating the voices of those intruded upon, is not the answer.
Acknowledgment of historic sins, releasing oneself from the burden of
having done wrong, embracing the Palestinians as genuine partners in
peace and coexistence, allowing the Palestinians to live and plan their
lives, these are the guarantors of Israels long term security,
its embrace in the region, and elimination of terrorism. This is the
context Abu Mazen needs to take on extremists. Otherwise, its
just a civil war that Mr. Sharon so wishes to sit back and watch.
There is no innocence lost
here, on either side, only the differential levels of mutual violence
and pain dictated by the awesome asymmetry of power between Israel and
the Palestinians. Israel has this final chance to pursue wise policies
that will lead to what Jewish Israelis and Palestinians deserve: to
live and breathe life fully. If the current Sharonian vision succeeds,
from which no viable Palestine can materialize, the eventual alternative
is bleak: no state, no society, can forever exist by the sword.
(Khalaf, political science
professor at Loras College (Dubuque, Iowa), is author of Politics in
Palestine )
Copyright 2003 Issa Khalaf