Israeli
Apartheid: The striking
Parallels To South Africa
By Bruce Dixon
22 August 2006
The Black Commentator
Imagine,
if you will, a modern apartheid state with first, second and eleventh
class citizens, all required to carry identification specifying their
ethnic origin. First class citizens are obliged to serve in the armed
forces, kept on ready reserve status until in their forties, and accorded
an impressive array of housing, medical, social security, educational
and related benefits denied all others.
Second class citizens are
exempted from military service and from a number of the benefits accorded
citizens of the first class. They are issued identity documents and
license plates that allow them to be profiled by police at a distance.
Second class citizens may not own land in much of the country and marriages
between them and first class citizens are not recognized by the state.
Second class citizens are sometimes arrested without trial and police
torture, while frowned upon and occasionally apologized for, commonly
occurs.
Citizens of the eleventh
class, really not citizens at all, have no rights citizens of the first
class or their government are bound to respect. Their residence is forbidden
in nearly nine-tenths of the country, all of which they used to own.
The areas left to them are cut up into smaller and smaller portions
weekly, by high walls, free fire zones and hundreds of checkpoints manned
by the army of the first class citizens, so that none can travel a dozen
miles in any direction to work, school, shopping, a job, a farm, a business
or a hospital without several long waits, humiliating searches and often
arbitrary denials of the right to pass or to return. Posh residential
settlements for the first class citizens with protecting gun towers
and military bases are built with government funds and foreign aid on
what used to be the villages and farms and pastures of the eleventh
class citizens. The settlers are allotted generous additional housing
and other subsidies, allowed to carry weapons and use deadly force with
impunity against the former inhabitants, and are connected with the
rest of first class territory by a network of of first-class citizen
only roads.
Citizens of the eleventh
class are routinely arrested, tortured, and held indefinitely without
trial. Political activism among them is equated to "terrorism"
and the state discourages such activity by means including but not limited
to the kidnapping of suspects and relatives of suspects, demolition
of their family homes, and extralegal assassination, sometimes at the
hands of a death squad, or at others times by lobbing missiles or five
hundred pound bombs into sleeping apartment blocks or noonday traffic.
Passports are not issued to these citizens, and those who take advantage
of scarce opportunities to study or work abroad are denied re-entry.
The apartheid state in question
is, of course, Israel. Its first class citizens are Israeli Jews, the
majority of them of European or sometimes American origin. The second
class citizens are Israeli Arabs, who enjoy significant but limited
rights under the law including token representation in the Knesset.
The eleventh class citizens are not citizens at all. They are Palestinians.
One expects to be able to say that Palestinians live in Palestine and
are governed by Palestinians, but the truth is something different.
The areas in which Palestinians may inhabit have shrunk nearly every
year since the Nakba, their name for the wave of mass deportations,
murders, the dispossession, destruction and exile of whole Arab towns,
cities and regions that attended the 1948 founding of the state of Israel.
As the whole world, except for the US public knows, Palestinians have
lived under military occupation, without land, without rights, without
hope, for nearly sixty years now.
The difference between life
inside and outside the US corporate media bubble is extraordinarily
clear on this question. US authorities subsidize the state of Israel
to the tune of at least six billion per year, and corporate media take
great pains to protect US citizens from news of actual human and legal
conditions their tax dollars pay for. The ugly and racist realities
of Israeli society and life under Israeli occupation are rarely discussed
anywhere most consumers of media might find them. It is nearly taboo
in mainstream US print and broadcast media to apply the words racist
or apartheid to the state of Israel or its policies, or to call its
control at the point of a gun of millions of non-citizens what it is,
namely the longest standing military occupation in the world today.
In the US media, and on the lips of every administration since Harry
Truman's Israel is "a democracy", whatever that word has come
to mean.
Though news stories in the
US talk about autonomous "Palestinian areas" allegedly controlled
by Palestinian authorities, often referring to Gaza and the West Bank
by name, actual maps displaying the geographic boundaries of the so-called
Palestinian controlled areas are rarely seen by American viewers, let
alone maps comparing the size of Palestinian areas year to year, or
showing the steady encroachment upon Arab land and water resources year
to year by Israeli settlements, military outposts, Israeli-only roads,
free fire zones and Israel's wall. The massive and militarized apartheid
wall, as the rest of the world calls it, is termed a "separation
barrier" or a "separation fence" in the US media, an
understandable precaution against hordes of terroristic former owners
of the land who lurk just outside.
Still, when you Google the
terms Israel + apartheid, you get 5.5 million hits. A lot of somebodies
somewhere are making the connection without the help of CNN, ABC or
Fox News.
The parallels with apartheid
South Africa are many and striking. Like its earlier apartheid cousin,
Israel menaces all its neighbors with an impressive array of nukes and
the largest military establishment in the region. As Noam Chomsky observed
back in 2004:
"Not discussed, in the US at least, is the threat from West Asia.
Israel's nuclear capacities, supplemented with other WMD, are regarded
as "dangerous in the extreme" by the former head of the US
Strategic Command (STRATCOM), Gen. Lee Butler, not only because of the
threat they pose but also because they stimulate proliferation in response.
The Bush administration is now enhancing that threat. Israeli military
analysts allege that its air and armored forces are larger and technologically
more advanced than those of any NATO power (apart from the US), not
because this small country is powerful in itself, but because it serves
virtually as an offshore US military base and high tech center. The
US is now sending Israel over 100 of its most advanced jet bombers,
F16I's, advertised very clearly as capable of flying to Iran and back,
and as an updated version of the F16s that Israel used to bomb Iraq's
nuclear reactor in 1981 ..."
The old South Africa bombed, strafed and invaded all its neighbors with
some regularity, crippling their commerce and extracting horrific death
tolls from refugee camps and other civilian targets. The last time Israel
invaded and occupied Lebanon, it left 30,000 corpses.
White South Africans rightly
fretted at the fact that they were a minority ruling over an unhappy
majority, and concocted schemes to exile the country's black population
to isolated rural reservations it called bantustans. Israeli pundits
calmly discuss the demographic bomb, their name for the fact that second
and eleventh class citizens, Israeli Arabs and Palestinians will soon
outnumber them within the borders of their supposed "Jewish state"
while Israeli politicians sit in Knesset and hold ministries in successive
governments openly calling for mass deportations and ethnic cleansing.
White South Africans constructed
for themselves a bogus scriptural narrative in which the God of Abraham
promised them somebody else's land, and brought it into modern history
with the embellishment that they were holding the line for the free
world against godless communism and the black menace. How similar is
Israel's line that European Jews are promised the land of Muslim and
Christian Arabs, and that they now hold the line for the free world
against radical Islam and those ungrateful brown people?
We at Black Commentator have
to believe that if the American people knew the truth about what their
tax dollars pay for in Israel and what is left of Palestine, there would
be a deep and widespread revulsion, similar to that occasioned by US
support for apartheid in South Africa. But there are important differences
between that time and this one. Though unspeakably odious, racist South
African was only marginally important to US interests. By contrast,
the maintenance of Israel's apartheid regime, essentially a white hi-tech
and military outpost in the middle of all those brown people sitting
atop a large share of the world's proven oil reserves is absolutely
central to US foreign policy for the foreseeable future. The US is Israel's
banker, its arms depot, and its principal diplomatic sponsor. The US
is far more complicit in the crimes of the Israeli state than it ever
was in South Africa.
Racism and apartheid being
what they are, and our historical experience in America being what it
is, African Americans have a crucial role to play. African Americans
have seldom supported US imperial adventures overseas as readily as
whites. Our American experience inclines us to a skeptical appraisal
of our government's means and motives at home and abroad. Even though
we live as much within the media bubble as white America, where images
of the broken and mangled families, the incinerated homes and bombed
hospitals are hard to come by, our skepticism leads us to sympathize
with those who live at the sharp end of US foreign policy far more often
than do our white neighbors.
Our first duty is to tell
the truth to each other. We must combat among ourselves the bogus historical
narratives which permit indifference to US policy in the Middle East
in general, and support of Israeli apartheid in particular. The churchgoers
among us urgently, publicly and repeatedly must confront and debunk
the nonsense which holds that "wars and rumors of wars" are
something predestined to happen in the biblical holy land for what they
are - bad scripture and fake history. We need to interrupt, correct
and school everyone who talks to us about a "cycle of violence"
in the Holy Land, as though some raggedy fool with a suicide belt, or
a few hundred fighters with small arms are or ever have been equivalent
to the devastation wrought by the established gulags, checkpoints, airborne
firepower, economic strangulation, house demolitions and nuclear armed
might of the Israeli state. The two sides do not have access to anything
like equal means of inflicting violence, and so cannot be equally culpable
or equally responsible for stopping that violence.
We need to catch up with
the rest of the civilized world, and talk about what we can do to emphatically
withdraw our support from the apartheid state of Israel and its immoral
and illegal occupation regime. The Presbyterian church, for example,
has in the past considered selective divestiture from Israel and from
US companies who profit from the occupation, as have the Anglicans.
Both might do so again. What can our churches, our unions, our local
elected officials, our young people do? What will we do?
Apartheid in South Africa
eventually bit the dust mostly because the inhabitants of that country,
black, brown and white resisted it, putting their bodies and lives on
the line. Their resistance was aided and abetted materially, financially,
politically and spiritually by people of good will the world over. Someday
the sun will rise on a post-apartheid Jerusalem, one that belongs to
all the people who live there of whatever origin. This is bound to happen
because Palestinians as well as substantial numbers of Israeli Jews
do and will continue to resist the regime. They will do what they can.
What will we do?
Editor of The Black Commentator, Bruce Dixon can be contacted at [email protected].