Nothing Real
By Noam Chomsky
22 February, 2005
Zmag
There are real US-Israel conflicts, but
they are not being reported in the US (they are in Israel). An important
one right now is the conflict over Israels efforts to sell advanced
military technology to China (Harpy drones), to which the US is strongly
objecting, as it has in the past, when Clinton compelled Israel in 2000
to cancel its transfer of Phalcon technology to China, after Israeli
authorities had sworn that they would never back down because of its
enormous significance to Israels highly militarized high-tech
economy. This goes way back.
On the end of the Arafat era offering new hopes, thats true in
only one respect: US-Israel are hoping that a new leadership may be
more willing to accept unchanged US-Israeli demands. I can only refer
you to my posting on the commentary on Arafats death.
We need not waste
time [on] our Dear Leaders [Bushs] efforts to spread
democracy, etc. Its normal, not only here, for the more
obsequious commentators to worship at the shrine of the political leadership,
who are always proclaiming noble visions. Thats why no serious
analyst ever pays the slightest attention to declarations of virtuous
intent by political leaders, which carry precisely zero information
because they are completely predictable, including Hitler, Stalin, Japanese
fascists, and virtually anyone else you can think of.
...The question
[regarding a change in strategic relations with Israel] always is: Wheres
the evidence?
One bit of evidence
is indeed put forth, with enormous enthusiasm in fact: the Sharon-Abbas
cease-fire. The gushing is understandable. The cease-fire is an enormous
victory for the US-Israeli rejectionism which, since Kissinger, has
blocked political settlement. The cease-fire is to be welcomed: better
no killing than killing. But take a careful look at the terms. The framework
is entirely that of US-Israeli rejectionism: Palestinian resistance,
even against the occupying army, must cease. Nothing could delight US-Israeli
hawks more than complete peace, which would enable them to pursue, unhindered,
the policies of US-Israeli takeover of the valuable land and resources
of the West Bank, and huge infrastructure projects to break up the remaining
Palestinian territories into unviable cantons. That has been the core
issue of the conflict for years, and there is not a single word about
it in the cease-fire agreement. Last year, US-backed Israeli settlement
programs increased the illegal settler population by 6%, to 450,000counting
East Jerusalem, illegally annexed in violation of Security
Council orders, but with a wink from the US, since expanded enormously,
and now recognized by the US as part of Israeltacitly by the press,
which even goes so far as to say that the illegal wallalso not
mentionedseparates the West Bank from Israel. Bush virtually put
the stamp of official approval on it. It would be hard to imagine a
clearer and more complete victory for US-Israeli rejectionism. The Abbas
government accepted it, much as the Arafat-led Tunis PLO
accepted Clintons doctrine that all UN resolutions are obsolete
and anachronisticopening the way, as predicted, to the continuation
of the US-backed Israeli settlement programs that continued without
a break through the Oslo years, reaching their highest level (pre-Sharon-Bush)
in 2000, the last year for Clinton and Barak. One might argue that its
the best they can do as long as the US keeps to its unilateral rejectionism,
and the population here lets it happen. But thats a separate
question. Theres no indication that I can see that anything has
changed.
Theres a somewhat
more general issue that is settled by the cease-fire agreement. The
strongest UN condemnation of terrorism, passed at Reaganite initiative
in 1987, had unanimous support (Honduras alone abstaining), apart from
the US and Israel, which voted against it. As they explained, the offending
passage was one that endorsed the right of resistance in accord with
the UN Charter against racist and colonialist regimes (meaning their
close ally Apartheid South Africa) and foreign military occupation (meaning
Israel). Unreported, as usual, when the facts shed an improper light
on the character of US elites. Now the US and Israel have won that battle.
Military occupation is declared legitimate, and no resistance to it
is tolerable. Another great victory for the rule of force, and demonstration
of the importance of a subservient intellectual community.
Id like to
be optimistic, and will leap at any straw in the wind. But so far I
see nothing real.