Divide
And Rule
By Galal Nassar
12 October, 2007
Al-Ahram
Weekly
The fig leaf has fallen. US claims
that the occupation of Iraq would be a prelude to the modernisation
of the region and the spread of democracy now ring hollow even to the
most fervent one-time believers. The US Senate has at long last stated
its intentions in no uncertain terms. They are intentions that confirm
our worst nightmare.
Two weeks ago, the Senate
voted 75-23 for a plan recommending the partitioning of Iraq. The plan
was championed by Joseph Biden, a democratic presidential hopeful and
head of the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee. It calls for Iraq
to be partitioned into Kurdish, Shia, and Sunni regions. The partitioning,
we are told, would end the violence, reduce chaos, and make it easier
for US forces to redeploy and confront "terror" more effectively.
Republican congressmen claim that such a move would do for Iraq what
the Dayton Accords (that divided Bosnia into Serbian, Croatian, and
Bosnian enclaves) did for Bosnia.
The recent carnage at Nusur
Square in Baghdad, and ongoing mayhem in other parts of the country,
cannot be viewed in isolation from the partition plan. Not that there
is anything particularly new in the idea: Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew
Brzezinski (both former national security advisers) have been mooting
the creation of mini-states in the region since the 1960s. The plan
to partition Iraq has also diverted attention from the Nusur Square
carnage committed by Blackwater contractors two weeks ago.
Since Iraq invaded Kuwait
on 2 August 1990 attempts have been made to weaken the state through
international blockades as well as through the revival of ethnic and
factional alliances.
There is a surreal aspect
to the tragedy unfolding in Iraq today. First, the Iraqi state had become
synonymous with the regime of Saddam Hussein. It was argued that removal
of the "dictatorial" central state -- through partitioning
-- was the best way of governing the country and eliminating terrorists.
Sweeping aside all the factors that had made Iraq what it was -- a mosaic
of minority communities -- partitioning was offered as the only way
ahead. It was helped by the country's structural weakness and the failure
of Iraq's first democratic attempt to defend the rights of the Kurds.
Since the creation of the Iraqi state nationality laws have left much
to be desired and the army's interference in politics worked to reinforce
the regime's propensity for despotism.
The Senate's partitioning
plan should come as no surprise. The desire to split the Arab world
into mini- states surfaced immediately after the 1973 War, when it became
clear that the Arabs were capable of standing up for themselves and
challenging the Zionist project. The Arabs then used their wealth to
promote national and regional interests. The use of oil as a means of
pressure -- regardless of the motives that emerged later -- proved that
the Arabs were capable of acting in unison if left alone. The then secretary
of state Henry Kissinger responded by arguing that the US should do
everything within its means to ensure that Israel remained the strongest
force in the region. His remarks didn't attract much comment in an Arab
world used to Washington's unquestioning backing of Israel.
Following the 1973 War, US
experts concluded that the partition of Arab states would have spin-off
benefits. It would not only preclude the formation of an Arab military
force capable of confronting the Zionist scheme but provide opportunities
to foment disputes over land and interests, making it easier for outsiders
to control the region's oil fields. Playing on sectarian and ethnic
sentiments would act to weaken the social fabric and ensuing inter-Arab
rivalries could prompt locals to seek the help and protection of major
powers, including the US. Last but not least, the division of the Arab
world would ensure the Middle East remained a docile market, and petrodollars
could be recycled back into the coffers of oil-consuming nations.
Jimmy Carter's administration
did the sums and decided to form a rapid deployment force. News started
coming in about military manoeuvres in Arizona and Nevada, in terrain
similar to that of oil-producing Arab countries. Later joint US-Arab
manoeuvres were conducted on Arab soil. Journals close to US decision
makers began to speak of Iraq as a soft target: its occupation, US writers
argued, could serve as a prelude to guaranteeing control of its oil
resources.
In January 1990 The Nation
predicted a war by the end of that year over Gulf oil resources. Following
the Gulf war, and during preparations for the Madrid peace conference,
US secretary of state James Baker predicted the political map of the
region would change more dramatically than it had after World War I
-- i.e. after the Sykes-Picot agreement and the Balfour Declaration.
Again the remarks went largely unnoticed, as did a paper leaked by US
intelligence services, "Succession in Saudi Arabia," which
outlined plans to split the kingdom.
The first practical step
the US administration took towards partitioning Iraq came in the early
1990s, with the imposition of no-fly zones. Soon afterwards president
Bill Clinton expanded the no-fly zones in the south and the north on
the pretext of protecting the Kurds and Shias. These zones provided
the blueprint for a future political map of Iraq. At a single stroke
Kurdish areas had been moved out of the reach of Baghdad's central government.
Following 9/11, US officials
started promoting creative chaos as a tool in their war on terror, hinting
at possible strikes against up to 15 Arab and Muslim countries. Simultaneously,
a strategic research institute affiliated with the Rand Corporation
published a report, Major Strategy, which discussed in detail plans
to divide the Arab world. The report viewed the occupation of Iraq as
a step towards subjugating all Arab countries. It even mentioned the
possibility of US strikes against Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Iraq, occupied amid promises
of a democratic dawn, has been thrown into a backwardness it hasn't
known for centuries. Sectarianism and ethnic loyalties have been revived.
The first transitional council was formed along ethnic and sectarian
lines. Senior posts were divided according to quotas designed to erase
the country's Arab and Islamic identity, and the US-inspired constitution's
interpretation of federalism bordered on an endorsement of partition.
Over the past few months
US researchers have concluded that partitioning Iraq is the only way
for the Bush administration to escape its current fix. What matters
for the US administration, it now transpires, is not the future of Iraq
or the interests of its people but the safety of the occupiers. In its
July 2006 edition, the US armed forces magazine spoke of a "blood
map" dividing the Arab world along ethnic and sectarian lines.
The scheme was already in action in Palestine, Lebanon, Sudan, and Somalia.
Iraq is unlikely to be the last venue for its implementation.
The partition of Iraq represents
one more rung on the ladder to creative chaos. It is a criminal act
that surpasses, in its insidiousness, any crimes the US administration
has so far committed in Iraq. And it opens the way for the implementation
of other suspect schemes mentioned in the Major Strategy report.
To oppose such plans is an
act of self-defence. Not to do so places the safety, security, stability,
and future of Arab states at risk. The Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916
paved the way for the partition of the Arab world after the fall of
the Ottoman Empire. The Balfour Declaration spelled the demise of Palestine.
In 1992 Rand scholar Graham Fuller asked, "Will Iraqi remain united?"
The answer to his question
holds the key to the future of the Middle East.
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.