'Where
One Burns Books,
One Will Soon Burn People'
By Jawed Naqvi
21 May, 2007
Countercurrents.org
Dev
Varam, a former colleague from Reuters, became a script-writer for Telugu
TV plays and movies. One day he came over to check out a line from Allama
Iqbal, which he wanted to use to show, in his own maudlin way, the supposedly
nationalist nature of India's Muslims. It didn't matter to Varam that
the line from Iqbal's poem Naya Shivala he was about to use would convey
a totally wrong meaning if it didn't accompany the first line too. The
complete verse would be – "Patthar ki moorty me samjha hai
tu khuda hai, Khak-i-watan ka mujhko har zarra devta hai." (You
believe that God resides in stone idols, O Brahmin. To me, each grain
of dust of my motherland is God personified, fit to be worshipped).
Varam, a mystical Hindu (who
could also play the sitar quite well) was seeking to show Indian Muslims
as devotees of their motherland, which is not a bad idea, but he did
not want to give space to their assertion against the benefits of idol
worship. "Half truths lead you nowhere except to more half truths,"
I cautioned him. Varam smiled and went on to use only the second half
of the verse he had set out to highlight to the exclusion of the context.
This is benign censorship.
A more pugnacious version
of proscription has been raging across the country for many years. Muslims,
Christians, Sikhs, Hindus, Marathas, Gujaratis, Bengalis, Kashmiris
– there's hardly any one who has not been singed by the menace.
There is of course another, equally criminal impediment to a free quest
of knowledge in a democracy, and that is corporate censorship. How the
Birlas and the Ambanis among other tycoons have taken turns to ban books
exposing their murky backstage is hardly ever discussed in the mainstream
media. But that is not the issue right now and we will discuss it at
an opportune time, hopefully quite soon.
However, cultural censorship
is rapidly gathering steam in India. A drawing student was recently
picked up from an arts college in Baroda and thrown into prison because
religious zealots raided the campus and objected to his painting of
Hindu gods and goddesses. M.F. Hussain, the maverick "barefoot"
artist is another example. He is living in exile because of court cases
and death threats against him, again because he painted Hindu gods and
goddesses in ways that were not liked by the mobs. And here we thought
only Muslims were excitable when it came to religion.
Interestingly, during his
days as a nominated MP, Hussain had sketched his fellow parliamentarians
by simply observing the intense debates in the Rajya Sabha. He gave
each of the characters his own funny twist. One such may have rubbed
L.K. Advani the wrong way. It was a drawing of the veteran BJP leader
that showed him vertically stretched at the temple, from the ear to
the bald pate. It was titled, "The Man with an elongated temple".
The reference was as much to the looks as undoubtedly to Advani's obsession
with a temple project in Ayodhya. Reason enough for Hussain to be menacingly
targetted.
But Ustad Faiyyaz Khan, honoured
in the 1950s as Aftab-i-Mausiqi for his elegance as a classical vocalist,
had not threatened anybody's religion or ethnic sentiments. On the contrary,
his "Manmohan Brij ko rasiya", an early morning composition
in Raag Paraj, and "Vande Nand Kumaram", an early evening
composition in Raag Kaafi, among other soul-searching "bandishes",
were actually celebrations of Lord Krishna, a beautiful syncretic thought
coming from a devout Muslim. Yet Faiyyaz Khan's grave in Baroda was
ripped apart during the violence in Gujarat in early 2002.
Similarly the shrine of Wali
Dakani, the renowned 17th century Urdu poet who sang paeans to Gujarat
and its Hindu-Muslim bonhomie, was flattened and became part of a metalled
road in Ahmedabad, also during the violence. Therefore, it seems that
the recent attack on Gujarat's young artist who was sent to jail does
not have its origins in religious sensitivities alone. It is more likely
rooted in a growing culture akin to Germany in the 1930s. It is useful
to note that the graves in Gujarat were razed just before the state
elections of 2002. Now Gujarat's artists are being threatened, again
just before the state elections fall due later this year.
In the neighbouring state
of Maharashtra too, there was a bizarre public response when the High
Court lifted a politically endorsed ban on James Laine's book Shivaji
– Hindu King in Muslim India recently. Laine's effigies were burnt
in several places and his publisher, Oxford University Press, were warned
against selling the book. The chief of the Shiv Sena urged the public
to burn copies of the book. Other political parties joined him in the
demand. Ironically, when Rajiv Gandhi banned Salman Rushdie's Satanic
Verses months before Iran shook the western world over the issue, the
Hindu right termed it as Muslim appeasement.
On May 9, The Times of India
shockingly reported that the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute
that was vandalised by people offended by a passage in Laine's book,
had now decided to support the ban. A research institute seeking ban
on a book is unheard of. The institute was apparently seeking proscription
after a recent ruling by the Supreme Court that endosed the Karnataka
government's ban on another book -- Dharmakarana. That book is claimed
to have hurt the sentiments of the followers of saint Basaveshvara and
the Veerashaiva community.
'Hurt sentiments' now threaten
to become a judicially acceptable ground for banning works of scholarship,
literature, and art – some of them alleged to be maliciously motivated.
Films are routinely attacked and cinema halls forced to shut down by
religious zealots of practically all communities. Dev Varam may not
belong to the category of these extra-constitutional law-enforcing mobs,
but in his own way he was trying to avoid "hurting the sentiments"
too – perhaps of Hindu idol worshippers. It is another matter
that Allama Iqbal did not quite endear himself to the Muslim fundamentalists
either, who issued fatwas on him for alleged apostasy. This is the normal
pattern, for this was what became of the liberal ground across the world
much before the rise of Adolf Hitler's Germany.
The writing on the wall looks
ominous. Barring a few exceptions, the Indian media have made light
of the attacks on the liberal intelligentsia. In this they are not too
dissimilar to the response to the rise of Hitler that was reflected
in American newspapers. About the book burning orgy organised by the
Nazi mobs in May 1933, some newspapers called the German student actions
"silly", "ineffective", "senseless", or
"infantile". The New Yorker made light of the "extra-curricular
activities" of Nazi students. Essayist E. B. White joked: "We
never burn books except to keep them out of the hands of the grand jury."
While some American editorial
responses to the Nazi book burnings played down the event and referred
to the "extra-curricular activities" of Nazi students, others
did forecast the dawning of a dark age. In a political cartoon entitled
"On the Altars of the Nazis", Jacob Burck evoked the prophetic
observation by 19th-century German writer Heinrich Heine: "Where
one burns books, one will soon burn people." This cartoon showed
two pyres, the "altars of the Nazis" – Nazi victims,
and condemned books. The piece was printed in the Daily Worker (Chicago),
May 11, 1933, almost exactly 74 years ago.
It has taken us some time
in India to acquire the skills, but, looking at the charred remains
of 2002, we are getting there.
[email protected]
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.
Click
here to comment
on this article