Corporate Exposes Be
The Test For Class Journalists?
is what someone wants to hide from you. Everything else is advertising.
This axiom has guided many a stalwart journalist for as long as one
can remember and India has had a fair share of them. Yet, despite an
emerging culture of exposes in the country's media that have brought
governments to their knees and even forced the exit of ministers, no
matter how grudgingly, there is an area of public life that most journalists
seem wary of looking into. That forbidden territory happens to be the
isolate and target the political class over corruption often do not
go all the way through the story to pin the source of the graft to the
ubiquitous and all powerful moneybags. On the one hand, the country
is growing into a corporate behemoth without, of course, tinkering too
much with its deep-rooted poverty. On the other, its ideological boundaries
that were shaped largely by the uneven development of capitalism from
colonial days are being realigned to suit the new corporate needs. Mukesh
Ambani and Rattan Tata who idolise Narendra Modi as their model chief
minister on the right wing of the ideological frame are shaking hands
with Budhhadev Bhattacharya, the chief minister of the leftist bastion
of West Bengal, with equal fervour. Corporate houses are bridging the
And as big
businesses widen their stranglehold on not just governance, but on institutions
of state, the media often find themselves parroting new definitions
thrown up by a new corporate lexicon. Public funding for the poor is
popularly called subsidies, while even greater public funding for rich
corporate houses is called incentives. Part of the explanation for this
obsequiousness is in the fact that almost all the advertising in the
English media comes from big business houses. "We know which side
our bread is buttered," wrote Vinod Mehta, editor of Outlook magazine.
He is perhaps the only Indian editor I know who has publicly advocated
exposes on corporate houses.
reason for journalists to keep away from probing the
questionable methods of the corporate world lies in the reality of
"legal terror", the threat to sue for libel that big businesses
heavy armour to bulldoze the rare rebel into submission. There are other
underhand methods too that come handy to ward off nosey-parkers. Two
books, for example, just disappeared from the market because they probed
influential business houses. The first to thus vanish was Mystery of
Birla House by intrepid Bengali writer publisher Debjyoti Burman. The
book about one of India's most politically influential families of businessmen
is said to have been sold to the Birlas, a deal which eventually included
its copyright too. A single cover somehow survived and is now preserved
in Delhi's Nehru Memorial Library in its "Rare Books" section.
This happened in 1953, six years into Independence.
Then it was
much later, in 1998 to be precise, that Allen & Unwin
published Hamish McDonald's account of the rise of Dhirubhai Ambani,
The Polyester Prince. That book also disappeared first from the Indian
markets and the rest of the world subsequently. A couple of years ago
it was available as a second hand copy on Amazon.com for $500, but on
the last check last week, even that offer had been withdrawn. The book
mostly circulates now as photocopy among the few academics and NGOs
that are interested in knowing the Ambani link with the Congress party,
the BJP and India's other political influence peddlers. Some of the
names mentioned in it are prominent members of Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh's cabinet. According to Prashant Bhushan, a Supreme Court
lawyer who has been crusading against the influence of big businesses
in judiciary and other organs of the state, The Polyester Prince was
proscribed by some court that no one really knows much about. That the
book is no longer available even as second copy on the web speaks volumes
for the clout India's largest business house commands not only at home
but also abroad.
It was under
these adverse circumstances that lawyer and financial activist Arun
K. Agrawal last week came out with a detailed and a potentially brave
expose in which he has sought to throw light on the complicity of India's
ruling elite – from the left to the right of parties in parliament
– in a cover-up, which pertains to the naming of Ambani's Reliance
unit as a greater beneficiary in the Iraqi oil for food scam than a
minister who was sacrificed. The scandal took its toll in India as nowhere
else, forcing the resignation of Kunwar Natwar Singh as India's foreign
is easily buried in India," says Agrawal, introducing his book
Reliance: The Real Natwar. "Files vanish, honest officers are transferred,
some nominal fining takes place and criminal offences are compounded."
In the case of the oil for food scam in India, says Agrawal, every speaker
who either sought to help or frame Natwar Singh hijacked the entire
debate in parliament. But every speaker also scrupulously avoided mentioning
the fact that the same table in the Volcker report that showed Singh
as a bribe-payer also named Reliance as culpable for the same charges.
One of these speakers was Finance
Minister P. Chidambaram.
extensively from both the Volcker report and the
parliament debate to make his point. He quotes Chidambaram as conceding
to parliament: "There are other contractual beneficiaries with
an India-connection. But this Motion is on Indian entities and individuals
allegedly involved as non contractual beneficiaries." So Chidambaram
did admit there were other non-contractual beneficiaries. "There
is therefore knowledge of the resolution and the existence of a third
party," says Agrawal. "And yet, he does not name Reliance
as a non contractual beneficiary." And for a good reason! By his
clever use of words, says Agrawal, Chidambaram avoided stating that
a private company did pay surcharge (bribe to the Iraqis), and thereby
about 10 TV cameras and scores of scribes who covered Agrawal's press
conference at the book release. The key speaker was Communist Party
of India's general secretary A.B. Bardhan. Needless to say that most
of the cameras did not generate a story, nor did the number of journalists
present at the book launch go on to narrate at least their own version
of the event. The book is of course not just about the names named but
as Agrawal says: "It is about the loot of the oil wealth –
more precious than gold – of the country and about all the other
kinds of loot tainted questions over which the name of Reliance seems
to mysteriously loom."
final word is addressed as much to Indian journalists as it is to the
political class. "The book has been written in the hope that those
in power and the media will be at least a little embarrassed and will
not let facts of extremely ugly bribery tiptoe past them so very easily
in the future. After all, there's no harm in hoping."
case has been shored by a crisp foreword written by
former law minister Shanti Bhushan. He says: "The enormous influence
of Reliance over all political parties and the media, acquired by using
its financial clout, poses a great danger to Indian democracy. Only
a strong and vigilant public opinion can save our precious democracy."
The Indian media have a credibility test to clear.
Share Your Insights
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.