Home

Follow Countercurrents on Twitter 

Why Subscribe ?

Popularise CC

Join News Letter

Editor's Picks

Press Releases

Action Alert

Feed Burner

Read CC In Your
Own Language

Bradley Manning

India Burning

Mumbai Terror

Financial Crisis

Iraq

AfPak War

Peak Oil

Globalisation

Localism

Alternative Energy

Climate Change

US Imperialism

US Elections

Palestine

Latin America

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Book Review

Gujarat Pogrom

Kandhamal Violence

WSF

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

Submission Policy

About CC

Disclaimer

Fair Use Notice

Contact Us

Search Our Archive

Subscribe To Our
News Letter



Our Site

Web

Name: E-mail:

 

Printer Friendly Version

A Palestinian State Saves All From Catastrophe

By Dan Lieberman

13 September, 2011
Countercurrents.org

The dispossessed Palestinians deserve a state, but the stateless Palestinians deserve more than the leadership that leads them to plead for a state. Palestinian inability to explain to a complacent world the necessity and reasons for establishing a state on land, which has been owned for generations by Palestinians, is constituted with Palestinians, will be governed by Palestinians, will be free of oppression by an alien authority, and devoid of submission to foreign elements jars the senses. World inability to realize that the establishment of a Palestinian state leads to the defining issue and irresolution of the defining issue will bring horror and grief to their lives freezes all thought.

If the United Nations accepts the Palestinian Authority petition for recognition as a state, then Israel will graduate from occupying another people's land to occupying another people's nation. A land is vague. A nation is concrete. Can anyone argue that it is illegal to have foreign soldiers in a nation without consent from the leadership of the nation? Is a country permitted to send its military and citizens into another country, use them to seize land, direct commerce, construct its own infrastructure, and perform police duties in the other state? With the trappings of a state, the Palestinians will have a solid legal means to evict the usurpers and initiate a trend - the beginning of a retreat by a clique of militarists, virulent nationalists, and subdued racists who learned that distortions of ancient history, mendacity, clever public relations, expressions of victimization, and self-pity convince the world that they deserved to expand territory and dominate the Middle East.

What if the Palestinians are refused a state, a more likely scenario? Will that mean that their ambition to live with dignity, certainty and sensibility within their own defined territory, and their aspirations for nationhood will be jeopardized forever? Will a United Nations refusal to recognize Palestinian rights be a veto of these rights and a semi-permanent decision to never again debate the issue? The case might become an all or nothing proposition for the Palestinians.

The possible derogatory effect of the Palestinian petition to establish a state raises a question: What can the Palestinians do to advance their cause if they withdraw the petition? If all avenues to free expression have been blocked, they can look forward to either passively accepting all Israel initiatives and, in effect, surrendering themselves to fate, or fighting with all means until the body count becomes unbearable to one or both sides.

Establishing a Palestinian state starts a process to resolve a dangerous crisis. One small step for a people, a giant step for mankind. A single victory that forecasts other victories. Not allowing the petition brings death and destruction to the Israelis and Palestinians, and others residing in the Levant parts of the world. Innocent, manipulated and self-destructive populations still don't recognize that the Israeli incursions into Lebanon, Gaza and the West Bank demonstrate Israeli leaders' disregard for lives beyond the borders they govern, and that they will use any weapon, including nuclear, to achieve their objectives. Talk to survivors of the U.S.S. Liberty, a U.S. naval vessel sailing in international waters when attacked by Israel aircraft during the 1967 Middle East war, to the American parents of Rachel Corrie, who was killed by an Israeli bulldozer, or the tens of thousands of persons around the world who each day suffer vicious abuse from Israeli apologists for only one reason - they oppose Israel's policies - and learn that nobody will be safe during the future aggressions.

Patiently, but inexorably, Israel's direct and indirect operations have reduced possible antagonists to impotence - Jordan, Egypt, South Africa, Ethiopia, Somalia, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Lebanon, Libya. Nations have reconstituted themselves and posed renewed challenges - Lebanon, Egypt, and South Africa, with rumblings from Jordan and Iraq. Add the deep antagonism to Israel from Indonesia to India, Iran, Gulf States, Saudi Arabia, North Africa, South Africa, parts of middle Africa, and many other nations around the world, and Israel's attempts to consolidate its present position and continue its trajectory of land seizures will always encounter resistance. The nation will always be surrounded by enemies.

The new Egypt has violently expressed its aversion to previous arrangements with Israel. Can we expect either Israeli occupation or 'pacification' of the Sinai?

Turkey has re-evaluated its relationship with those who wave the Star of David flag. Will actions to counter Israel's supremacist attitude follow Turkey’s decision to expel Israel’s ambassador?

The Arab awakening is being transformed into a Muslim awakening. New governments in North Africa will contain elements of Radical Islam (Travelers to Tunisia personally inform of a Muslim religious re-awakening). These elements will neither compromise a Muslim perspective on Jerusalem nor retreat from combating Israel's oppression of the Palestinian people.

Radical Islam is a growth industry, not unlike the growth of the Religious Right in the United States. Within Radical Islam, hundreds of thousands extremists exist; many prepared to make an ultimate sacrifice for their cause. Suppressing the extremists by self-constituted international policemen is an endless task, especially when the activities of the nations that provide the policemen encourage the formation of extremist elements and internationalization of their terrorism. By refusing to takes forcible actions that can halt continuous Israeli aggression in the Levant and by taking actions that deny legitimate Palestinian aspirations, the western powers subject Israel's population and themselves to attacks for an eternity.

There is a larger danger. Violence sails along the winds of antagonism. Undoubtedly, when a Middle East antagonist faces extinction, and that will happen, that nation will use the nuclear alternative. Recognition of a Palestinian state initiates a reversal of the trend to the larger danger and saves a great many from catastrophe. What more can those who value life want for themselves and others?

Dan Lieberman is the editor of Alternative Insight, a monthly web based newsletter. His website articles have been read in more than 150 nations, while articles written for other websites have either appeared or been linked in online journals throughout the world. Many have served as teaching resources in several universities and several have become Internet classics, each attracting thousands of readers annually. Dan can be reached at [email protected]

 

 



 


Comments are not moderated. Please be responsible and civil in your postings and stay within the topic discussed in the article too. If you find inappropriate comments, just Flag (Report) them and they will move into moderation que.