Join News Letter

Iraq War

Peak Oil

Climate Change

US Imperialism

Palestine

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Globalisation

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Gujarat Pogrom

WSF

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

Submission Policy

Contact Us

Fill out your
e-mail address
to receive our newsletter!
 

Subscribe

Unsubscribe

 

J&K Reluctant To Share
Information With Public

By Zafar Choudhary

14 October, 2006
Countercurrents.org

The identity of Jammu and Kashmir as a State that refuses to share power with people or devolve authority to the grassroots democratic institutions of governance can be seen in the regional and sub-regional dissension. Over a period of last two and half years Jammu and Kashmir has assumed yet another unique identity –a State that refuses to share information with people.

Nearly three years back when the country was debating the quantum of public right to access the official information, Jammu and Kashmir emerged as first state to come up with a law on right to information. The enthusiasm of the government was so high that it did not wait for the routine legislature session, which begins February every year, to enact the law. It was on January 5, 2004 that the state government through an ordinance accented by the Governor introduced the Right to Information Act, which was however, later ratified by the assembly as a piece of legislation. This was well before the Parliament of India passed the RTI Act.

After many hiccups and debates, the Right to Information Act enacted by the Parliament of India was last year given a formal shape and a commission, under Wajahat Habibullah was set up to process and monitor the queries and complaints under the law. Ironically, owing to the special status all laws enacted by the Parliament do not necessarily extend to Jammu and Kashmir. Therefore the benefits of the Central Information Commission are yet to reach here. What is more ironic is the fact that even 34 months after due legislation on the law, the Right to Information is yet to be implemented in Jammu and Kashmir.

At a time when the Right to Information Act was passed by the state legislature, the government had described it as major achievement in public accountability and transparency. The Act made it mandatory for all government departments to publish a citizen charter and designate special officers for sharing the required information with the public. However, nearly three years down the line, over 90 per cent of the departments, directorates and public bodies are yet to follow guidelines issued under the Act and issue obligatory "Citizens Charter". Only three out of 133 Government Departments and public bodies have issued and publicised "Citizens Charter" containing the information they can provide to citizens and given it publicity through their websites and newspaper advertisements. Precisely 120 different departments and public bodies are yet to declare the citizen's charter. About a dozen departments have also prepared the "Citizens Charter" but were yet to make it public or give it due publicity, required for the citizens.

In fact the government does not seem to be interested in sharing information with the public. This can be gauged from the reluctance of the law department, a department responsible for drafting the law on right to information, in declaring the citizen's charter. Even the departments under the control of Chief Minister –including Home and General Administration –have not come up with a mechanism on sharing information with public.

The General Administration Department, which has overall control over all government departments and public bodies in implementation of much publicised RTI Act, is still in the process of putting its "Citizens Charter" on its website.

A GAD officer told the Excelsior that the Department was launching its website very soon and its "Citizens Charter" will also be put on the site.

Admitting that every Department and public body was under obligation under Section 3 of the RTI Act to notify its "Citizens Charter" indicating what services it can provide to the people and how and what kind of information the people can seek from them, a GAD officer, however, maintained that every Department was duty bound to publish the Charter.

He said the GAD would issue a fresh directive to all Government Departments and public bodies to immediately follow the RTI Act guidelines. He admitted that it was "too late" for the Departments to come out with their "Citizens Charters".

The State Vigilance Organisation (SVO) was the first Department to come out with its "Citizens Charter" under the RTI Act, followed by Police Department and Rural Development Department (RDD), in Kashmir division. About a dozen other Departments were also reported to have prepared their "Citizens Charter" but were yet to give it due publicity, as required for public awareness.

Under Section 3 of the RTI Act, all Government Departments and public bodies were required to make the citizens aware of free of cost or otherwise the services and facilities being provided to them by their Departments. The officer(s) whom to apply or how to apply for obtaining necessary information or formalities required for getting facilities were also to be made public by the Departments.

All such information was to be put on websites by the Departments and the public bodies which have their own website while other Departments had to publicize the information through newspapers and other possible modes of publicity.

Powers and duties of the Departments' officers and employees and procedure followed by them in decision making process, norms set by the public authority for discharge of its functions, rules, regulations, instructions, manuals and other categories of records under its control used by its employees for discharging its functions, details of facilities available to citizens for obtaining information, all important decisions and policies that affect the public while making decisions and policies, reasons for decisions and whether administrative or quasi-judicial to those affected by such decisions was the information which was required to be made public by the Departments and public bodies, the sources said. Under the same Section, before initiating any project, the Department or public bodies were supposed to publish or communicate to the general public or people likely to be affected by the project in particular.

The author if Resident Editor of English daily, Kashmir Images, Jammu edition and Executive Director, Center for Media Research and Documentation. He can be contacted at [email protected]

Leave A Comment
&
Share Your Insights

 

Get CC HeadlinesOn your Desk Top

 

 

 

 

Search Our Archive



Our Site

Web