Mush
Was Right. But Who Can
Trust Him Anymore?
By Abid Ullah Jan
11 October, 2007
Countercurrents.org
After
the October 12, 1999 coup, I for one, fully supported General Musharraf
against the onslaught of the Commonwealth and the US administration,
who made clear that they cannot do “business as usual” with
a dictator. The reason for supporting the General was obvious: the determination
he showed to clean the Augean stables.
Fast forward from Musharraf’s
1999 promise of “across the board” accountability to the
deal with Benazir Bhutto and the so-presented National Reconciliation
Ordinance (NRO) of October 2007, and we see the same General making
a U-turn on all that he said, promised and felt proud of.
The love for power, the feeling
of indispensability or opportunism to some extent is understandable.
However, what makes one lose complete trust in General Musharraf is
what he not only said time and again but also wrote down in his book
to make it part of history and his legacy. Dictation by practical or
prudent motives is one thing, but going against one’s eight years’
record of consistent statements, a show of determination to root out
corruption and combat the forces that nation is quite another.
Even if we limit ourselves
to General Musharraf’s book alone, still there is plenty to show
us the true character of the General for which no justification holds
ground.
Starting on page 78, Musharraf
writes in his memoire, In the Line of Fire: “The four changes
of prime minister involved two cycles of alteration between Benazir
Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif. Never in the history of Pakistan had we seen
such a combination of the worst kind of governance – or rather,
a nearly total lack of governance – along with corruption and
the plunder of national wealth.”
Let us assume that before
making a deal with Benazir, Musharraf had somehow guaranteed that the
twice tested Benazir won’t get involved in corruption and plunder
of national wealth anymore. The question that arises is of the basic
human rights. We know the country is comprised of two main classes:
he feudal lords and elites and the masses. However, aren’t the
deal and the NRO officially confirming that Pakistanis are not equal
citizens any more.
On page 185 of his book,
General Musharraf told the world: “In the area of economic governance
our main endeavor was to level the playing field and close loopholes
that favored a select, privileged few. The ad hoc system of regulations,
which dominated our decision making in the 1990s, was replaced
by a transparent, uniform, across the board system. Accountability
mechanisms were strengthened, and people found guilty of corruption
were taken to task irrespective of their status and connections. This
deterrent effect has reduced corruption at the higher levels of
policy makers.”
Where did across the board
system go? Musharraf told a private TV on October 10 that NRO was not
meant for the entire Pakistan otherwise matter would worsen. What does
that mean> It shows he was either lying, or was not sincere when
he said, “accountability mechanisms were strengthened, and people
found guilty of corruption were taken to task irrespective of their
status and connections.”
Everyone know that People’s
Party’s manifesto has not changed. Benazir is still the chairperson
for life. And the party remains what Musharraf described as a ‘family
cult.” What national interest lead Musharraf to change his mind?
In displaying his contempt for PPP and Benazir, Musharraf went to the
extent of calling them fascist. He wrote: “The People's Party
has always claimed the progressive and liberal ground. If this claim
was taken at face value, it was the logical first choice for the coalition.
It was a good opportunity for them to demonstrate that they were
truly liberal and not just it a family cult that practices fascism rather
than liberal democracy, as when this party was in power in the 1970s.
But all efforts by the PML(Q) to work with them failed, for the sole
reason that Benazir Bhutto would not countenance anyone else from her
party becoming prime minister. She treats the party and the office like
a family property.[page 175]
Has the PPP transformed overnight
from a “family cult” that practiced “fascism”
to a party that will promote democracy in Pakistan? Or, is it the General
who actually changed his mind and embraced the same cult and its fascist
ways? Or, is it so that he was not telling the truth in the first place?
Since PPP is what PPP was, it leaves us to look for answer in the later
two possibilities.
The General told the world
that Benazir and Nawaz were “ the heads of two significant political
parties - the Pakistan people's Party (PPP)) and the Pakistan Muslim
League (PML-N). And because these parties were run like dynasties, candidates
who could provide alternative leadership were none existent or
mere pygmies. It did not appear practicable to maintain those parties
alone. Something more had to be done.”[page 165]. What more did
the General do after eight years in power: made a deal with the same
dynasty of the PPP? Is this all he could do to save Pakistan after eight
years in power?
Remember how proudly Musharraf
was telling us that when he took power, he knew that freedom was “needed
to be spread to everyone.” However that needed “a system
that could produce true democracy.” He elaborated on page 164-65
that to ensure such a system: “Former prime ministers Nawaz Sharif
and Benazir Bhutto, who had twice been tried, been tested, and failed,
had to be denied a third chance. They had misgoverned the nation. Furthermore,
they would never allow their parties to develop a democratic tradition,
as was clear from the fact that neither Benazir Bhutto's nor Nawaz Sharif's
had held internal elections. In fact, Benazir became her party’s
‘chairperson for life’ in the tradition of the old African
dictators! For both individuals, legal cases were pushing against them.
All I had to do was make clear that the charges would not be dropped.
Benazir Bhutto had already run away from the country and absconded from
the law during Nawaz Sharif’s regime.”
So, here we go. Today he
drops all charges against Benazir Bhutto. Moreover, to shut mouths of
other criminals, he had to grant across the board amnesty – a
nose dive from ‘across the board accountability” to blanket
amnesty as if all the criminal charges were related to plundering Musharraf’s
personal property, which he could pardon anytime he wanted. Was he lying
when he said he had made sure that the “charges would not be dropped”?
Besides all that, isn’t
he reviving what he called ‘the tradition of the old African dictators”?
On page 169 of his book, Musharraf is on the record to have stated:
“We established a rule that no one could be president or prime
minister more than twice, whether the terms were consecutive or
not and whether either term had been fully served or not. Many people
thought this law has been brought in to prevent Nawaz Sharif or Benazir
Bhutto from ever becoming prime minister again. This is partially true,
although their crimes should disqualify them in any event. But above
all the new rule was enacted to encourage new blood to compete …”
Did Musharraf forget all
these statements and Banazir’s crimes when he was out there to
make a “power-sharing” deal with Benazir? Or, is it that
he was lying in the first place? Or, that he doesn’t care if says
one thing and does another?
Musharraf was right in his
analysis, statements and promises. However, his deeds proves him to
be part of the same corrupt league. The story in today’s newspapers
about Musharraf being one of the 499 owners whose farmhouse spread over
2500 acres of land worth Rs 75 billion in the suburbs of Islamabad simply
confirms this conclusion.
Other than those who have
some personal or global totalitarian axe to grind, with this proven
track record of glaring contradictions and brazen lies no one can trust
General Musharraf anymore
Abid Ullah Jan
edits www.icssa.org
and www.dictatorshipwatch.com.
He is a political analyst and author of seven
books on international affairs.
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.