Follow Countercurrents on Twitter 


Support Us

Popularise CC

Join News Letter


CC Videos

Editor's Picks

Press Releases

Action Alert

Feed Burner

Read CC In Your
Own Language

Bradley Manning

India Burning

Mumbai Terror

Financial Crisis


AfPak War

Peak Oil



Alternative Energy

Climate Change

US Imperialism

US Elections


Latin America









Book Review

Gujarat Pogrom

Kandhamal Violence



India Elections



Submission Policy

About Us


Fair Use Notice

Contact Us

Search Our Archive


Our Site


Subscribe To Our
News Letter

Name: E-mail:


Printer Friendly Version

Quit India Movement And INA vs. Hindutva

By Shamsul Islam

14 August, 2012

This August we are celebrating the 70 th anniversary of the Quit India Movement [QIM] and Indian National Army [INA] or Azad Hind Fauj which 1943 onward was commanded by Netaji Subash Chandra Bose. It is true that INA commanded by Netaji and QIM led by Indian National Congress had serious ideological divergence; both stood for two different strategies for independence of India. However, both these movements proved to be milestones in the history of Indian freedom struggle. Undoubtedly, millions of Indians who wished end of the foreign rule in India participated in these two movements, many of them sacrificing their lives and personal liberties for the cause of national liberation. These two movements became rage in their times and produced innumerable icons both women and men in the history of freedom struggle. In a co-incidence, the two leading female freedom fighters, Marinal Gore (a close associate of MK Gandhi and a pantheon of QIM) and Captain Laxmi Sehgal (a legendry associate of Netaji and Commander of the famed Laxmi Bai Regiment of the INA) died in the same month of July last.

The heroic deeds, on the one hand, of the fighters of INA against the British forces in South-east Asia and on the North-east borders of India, and, on the other hand by the masses moved by the call Congress of QIM in every nook and corner of the country stirred the whole nation and remain a source of inspiration to the common people even today. These two movements were testimony to the fact that freedom fighters who participated in these two movements remained committed for an inclusive India rising above religious, caste, linguistic and regional divides. There was every likelihood that if these two historic movements had succeeded India would not have been dismembered in the name of religion and we would have successfully succeeded in responding to the divisive politics of mixing up of religion with nationality. It would have been a different India today. Unfortunately the people of this sub-continent had to pay a heavy price when these movements did not succeed, more than 1.2 million lost their lives, 12 million were forced to abandon their hearth and home and there is no record of women raped, forced to convert and people maimed.

Most of us know that the then Communist Party of India opposed the QIM thus betraying a great phase of mass upsurge in the history of the freedom struggle. However, what role the then Hindutva camp consisting of Hindu Mahasabha and Rashtriya Sawayamsevak Sangh remains in wrap for reasons unknown. The Hindutva camp together not only opposed both the QIM and INA but also provided multifaceted and multi-dimensional support to the British rulers in suppressing these movements. In this connection shocking documents are available to be read and believed.

Veer Savarkar Stood with British Imperialists against Subhash Chandra Bose

Hindutva brigade continues to pretend to have great admiration for Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose who attempted to organize a military campaign to force the British out of India. But very few people know about the terrible betrayal of his cause by Hindu Mahasabha under the leadership of Veer Savarkar. When Netaji during World War II was trying to secure foreign support, specially of Japan, for liberation of the country and trying to organize a military attack on the northeast of the country it was Vinayak Damodar Savarkar known as Veer Savarkar who offered full military co-operation to the British masters as early as 1941. While addressing 23rd session of Hindu Mahasabha at Bhagalpur, he said:

“So far as India's defence is concerned, Hindudom must ally unhesitatingly, in a spirit of responsive co-operation with the war effort of the Indian government in so far as it is consistent with the Hindu interests, by joining the Army, Navy and the Aerial forces in as large a number…Again it must be noted that Japan's entry into the war has exposed us directly and immediately to the attack by Britain's enemies. Consequently, whether we like it or not, we shall have to defend our own hearth and home against the ravages of the war and this can only be done by intensifying the government's war effort to defend India. Hindu Mahasabhaits must, therefore, rouse Hindus especially in the provinces of Bengal and Assam as effectively as possible to enter the military forces of all arms without losing a single minute.” (1)

When the British government in the wake of the World War II decided to raise new battalions of its armed forces, it was Hindu Mahasabha under direct command of Savarkar which decided to enroll Hindus in a big way in this venture. This is what Savarkar reported to the delegates at the Hindu Mahasabha session at Madura:

“Naturally, the Hindu Mahasabha with a true insight into a practical politics decided to participate in all war efforts of the British government in so far as they concerned directly with the question of the Indian defence and raising new military forces in India.” (2)

It was not as if Veer Savarkar was unaware of the strong resentment which was brewing in the ranks of common Indians against such an approach. He brushed aside any criticism of Hindu Mahasabha decision of co-operating with the British in war efforts as,

“political folly into which the Indian public is accustomed to indulge in thinking that because Indian interests are opposed to the British interests in general, any step in which we join hands with the British government must necessarily be an act of surrender, anti-national, of playing into the British hands and that co-operation with the British government in any case and under all circumstances is unpatriotic and condemnable.”(3)

While Congress under the leadership of MK Gandhi declared World War II as imperialist war and gave slogan ‘'naa ek bhai, naa ek pie' (not a single brother as recruit, not a single pie as contribution), Veer Savarkar strongly criticized this stand in the following words:

“let it not be forgotten that those who fancy that they can claim of not having co-operated with the government and helped the war-efforts either on account of the demoralising and hypocritical fad of absolute non-violence and non-resistance even in face of an armed aggression or as a matter of policy simply because they do not join the fighting forces, are but indulging in self-deception and self-complacency.”(4)

His call to the Hindus had no ambiguity: ‘Let the Hindus therefore come forward now and enter the army, the navy and the air-forces, the ordnance and other war-crafts factories in their thousands and millions.' (5)

Those who declare Veer Savarkar as a great patriot and freedom fighter will surely bow their heads in shame when they read the following instruction from Veer Savarkar to those Hindus who were to join the British forces:

“One point however must be noted in this connection as emphatically as possible in our own interest that those Hindus who join the Indian [read the British] Forces should be perfectly amenable and obedient to the military discipline and order which may prevail there provided always that the latter do not deliberately aim to humiliate Hindu Honour.” (6)

Astonishingly, Savarkar never felt that joining the armed forces of the colonial masters was in itself a great humiliation for any self-respecting and patriotic Hindu.

Hindu Mahasabha under Savarkar's leadership organised high-level War Boards in different regions of the country to help the Hindus seeking recruitment in the British armed forces. 7 Moreover, the Viceroy accommodated persons of Veer Savarkar's choice in the National Defence Council to which Veer Savarkar thanked in the following telegram to the Viceroy and General Wavell, the Commander in-Chief of the British forces.


Veer Savarkar Betrayed Quit India Movement by Helping the British & Muslim League

In the wake of Quit India call to the British rulers on August 8, 1942, the British rulers dismissed the Congress led governments in many Provinces. The British rulers also unleashed a general reign of state terror and repression. While Congress cadres and large sections of Indian masses were facing immense repression of the colonial rulers and decided to boycott the state institutions, Hindu Mahasabha decided to cooperate with the British rulers. While addressing the 24th session of Hindu Mahasabha at Cownpore (now Kanpur) in 1942, Savarkar outlined the strategy of Hindu Mahasabha of co-operating with the rulers in the following words:

“The Hindu Mahasabha holds that the leading principle of all practical politics is the policy of Responsive c o-operation. And in virtue of it, it believes that all those Hindu Sanghatanists who are working as councillors, ministers, legislators and conducting any municipal or any public bodies with a view to utilise those centres of government power to safeguard and even promote the legitimate interests of the Hindus without, of course, encroaching on the legitimate interests of others are rendering a highly patriotic service to our nation. Knowing the limitations under which they work, the Mahasabha only expects them to do whatever good they can under the circumstances and if they do not fail to do that much it would thank them for having acquitted themselves well. The limitations are bound to get themselves limited step by step till they get altogether eliminated. The policy of responsive co-operation which covers the whole gamut of patriotic activities from unconditional co-operation right up to active and even armed resistance, will also keep adapting itself to the exigencies of the time, resources at our disposal and dictates of our national interest. ” (9) [Italics as in the original]

Hindu Mahasabha led by Veer Savarkar ran Coalition Governments with Muslim League in 1942

It is not widely known that when Congress opposed any dealing with the Muslim League in 1942, Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League ran coalition governments in Sind and Bengal. Savarkar defended this nexus in his presidential speech to the 24th session of Hindu Mahasabha at Kanpur in 1942 in the following words:

“In practical politics also the Mahasabha knows that we must advance through reasonable compromises. Witness the fact that only recently in Sind, the Sind-Hindu-Sabha on invitation had taken the responsibility of joining hands with the League itself in running coalition Government. The case of Bengal is well known. Wild Leaguers whom even the Congress with all its submissiveness could not placate grew quite reasonably compromising and socialable as soon as they came in contact with the HM and the Coalition Government, under the premiership of Mr. Fazlul Huq and the able lead of our esteemed Mahasabha leader Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerji, functioned successfully for a year or so to the benefit of both the communities.” (10)

Role of RSS

The other flag-bearer of the Hindutva, RSS was not different in its attitude towards QIM and INA. It openly sided with its mentor Veer Savarkar's campaign for recruitment in the British armed forces in early 1940s. It organized meetings with Veer Savarkar as main speaker calling upon Hindu youths to join the British forces.

The RSS attitude towards the QIM can be known by the following utterances of its second chief and most prominent ideologue till date, MS Golwalkar. While talking about the outcome of Non-Cooperation Movement and QIM he said”

“Definitely there are bound to be bad results of struggle. The boys became unruly after the 1920-21 movement. It is not an attempt to throw mud at the leaders. But these are inevitable products after the struggle. The matter is that we could not properly control these results. After 1942, people often started thinking that there was no need to think of the law.” (11)

Thus the prophet of Hindutva, Golwalkar wanted the Indians to respect the draconian and repressive laws of the inhuman British rulers! He admitted that this kind of negative attitude towards QIM did not go well even with the RSS cadres.

“ In 1942 also there was a strong sentiment in the hearts of many. At that time too the routine work of Sangh continued. Sangh vowed not to do anything directly. However, upheaval (uthal-puthal) in the minds of Sangh volunteers continued. Sangh is an organization of inactive persons, their talks are useless, not only outsiders but also many of our volunteers did talk like this. They were greatly disgusted too. ”(12)

It would be interesting to note what Golwalkar meant by ‘Routine work of Sangh'. It surely meant working overtime to widen the divide between Hindus and Muslims thus serving the strategic goal of the British rulers and the Muslim League.

The failure of the QIM and INA was a tragedy for India's freedom struggle. No doubt the British were the main culprits but there were other culprits too who need to be exposed.

Shamsul Islam is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Satyawati College, University of Delhi. notoinjustice@gmail.com


(1) Cited in VD Savarkar, Samagra Savarkar Waangmaya: Hindu Rashtra Darshan , vol. 6, Maharashtra Prantik Hindu Sabha, Poona, 1963, p. 460.

(2) Ibid. p. 428.

(3) Ibid. pp. 428-29.

(4) A. S. Bhide (ed.), Vinayak Damodar Savarkar's Whirlwind Propaganda: Extracts from the President's Diary of his Propagandist Tours Interviews from December 1937 to October 1941 , na, Bombay, 1940, p. xxiv.

(5) Ibid. p. xxvi.

(6) Ibid. p. xxviii.

(7) Ibid. p. xxvii.

(8) Ibid. p. 451.

(9) Cited in VD Savarkar, Samagra Savarkar Waangmaya: Hindu Rashtra Darshan , vol. 6, Maharashtra Prantik Hindu Sabha, Poona, 1963, p. 474.

(10) Samagra Savarkar Wangmaya , vol. 6, op. cited, pp. 479-480. Hindu Mahasabha joined a coalition government with Muslim League in NWFP also.

(11) MS Golwalkar, Shri Guruji Samagra Darshan, (collected works of Golwalkar in Hindi) vol. IV, Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna, Nagpur, nd, p. 41.

(12) Ibid, p. 40.




Comments are moderated