Is
Bush Nuts?
By William Thomas
April 2, 2003
What drives a man to go against the wishes of his countryfolk and the
entire world community - including the presidents of Russia, China,
France and Germany?
How can a professed Christian
continue to defy church leaders worldwide - including the Bishops of
Britain and the Pope? How does he rationalize breaking the commandments
of his God, which clearly prohibit coveting another's property, theft
of their oil, and mass murder of defenseless populations?
How can he ignore his own
generals when they complain, "We're advocating a policy that says
we will invade another nation that is not currently attacking us or
invading any of our allies." [Capitol Hill Blue Jan, 22, 2003]
To those who deem it unseemly
to count the brick's on one man's load, let us recall that this unelected
President is one brick short of killing what the UN fears could be up
to a half-million people in Iraq. This massacre could easily see Pakistan's
government and its 30 to 40 nukes falling to an al Qaeda/Taliban
majority. Bush's announced plans to attack North Korea and Iran have
already prompted both countries to hit the nuclear gas pedal, virtually
assuring a "nuclear event". And his $5 trillion blowout has
taken the American economy to a $2 trillion deficit in two short years.
As ignored global warming triggers Extreme Weather Events, frightened
Nobel price-winning economists warn that GW's proposed $600 billion
tax cut is "fiscal madness" - "a very serious economic
error" that will collapse the country in exactly the same way the
ex-Soviet Empire went bust buying and deploying so many arms in so many
places. Ditto Imperial Rome.
Are these the acts of a rational
person?
Not since Nixon's famous
freak-outs in the White House, which saw National Security Adviser Henry
Kissinger ordering military commanders to ignore nuclear launch orders
from their Commander-In-Chief, is it so urgent that we examine a president's
cognitive capacities. [The Trial of Henry Kissinger]
It might be useful to scrutinize
the following findings. While everyone "goes nuts" from time
to time, the salient question is whether traits described below dominate
and drive today's presidential decisions. Is a man called by other government
reps, "an idiot" "an imbecile" "dangerously
incompetent" and "a moron" competent, capable and qualified
to direct America's unchallenged military might?
Read on. If you dare.
PATTERN RECOGNITION
"Is The 'President'
Nuts?" asks Carol Wolman, M.D. "Many people, inside and especially
outside this country, believe that the American president is nuts, and
is taking the world on a suicidal path." [Counterpunch Oct. 2,
2002]
A board-certified psychiatrist
in practice for 30 years, Dr. Wolman feels compelled to understand the
"psychopathology" of man "under tremendous pressure from
both his family/junta, and from the world at large." Dr. Wolman
wonders if GW is suffering from Antisocial Personality Disorder, as
described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition:
"There is a pervasive
pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others: 1) failure
to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated
by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest; 2) deceitfulness,
as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for
personal profit or pleasure; 5) reckless disregard for safety of self
or others; 7) lack of remorse by being indifferent to or rationalizing
having hurt, mistreated or stolen from others."
DRY DRUNK
GW Bush is highly regarded for "kicking" the twin demons of
cocaine and alcohol addiction. If he is still off both wagons
and there is no proof that isn't such a triumph, encouraged and
aided by his wife, is commendable.
When probing the mysteries
of GW's brain chemistry, a key point to ponder is that damage done to
brain cells from drug abuse is permanent and irreversible.
Quaker and university professor
Katherine van Wormer co-authored the definitive, 2002, Addiction Treatment.
This expert writes that "George W. Bush manifests all the classic
patterns of what alcoholics in recovery call 'the dry drunk'. His behavior
is consistent with being brought on by years of heavy drinking and possible
cocaine use." [Counterpunch Oct. 11, 2002]
"Dry drunk," explains
the professor, "is a slang term used by members and supporters
of Alcoholics Anonymous and substance abuse counselors to describe the
recovering alcoholic who is no longer drinking - one who is dry, but
whose thinking is clouded."
Such an individual is 'dry'
but not truly sober. Such individuals tend to go to overboard. A good
example of Bush' "polarized thinking" is his call for "crusades"
based on "infinite justice" for "evil-doers" comprising
an "axis of evil".
Bush's "obsessive repetition"
also remind this professor, "of many of the recovering alcoholics/addicts
I had treated." Van Wormer worriers, "His power, in fact,
is such that if he collapses into paranoia, a large part of the world
will collapse with him."
Paranoia? Impatience? Rigid
judgmental outlook? Grandiose behavior? Childish behavior? Irresponsible
behavior? Irrational rationalization? Projection? Overreaction?
- these are all "dry drunk" traits.
Van Wormer observers that
Bush's pompous pledge: "We must be prepared to stop rogue states
and their terrorist clients before they are able to threaten or use
weapons of mass destruction" is a projection from the world's leading
rogue state preparing to attack with nuclear weapons.
"Bush's tendency to
dichotomize reality" should be emphasized. Prof. van Wormer describes
this is as either/or reasoning - "either you are with us or against
us". A White House spokesperson puts it this way: "The President
considers this nation to be at war, and, as such, considers any opposition
to his policies to be no less than an act of treason.'' [Capitol Hill
Blue Jan, 22, 2003]
BUSH'S BINGES HISTORY IMPACTS THE PRESENT
Bush's binges were legendary.
Van Wormer describes "years of binge drinking starting in college,
at least one conviction for DUI in 1976 in Maine, and one arrest before
that for a drunken episode involving theft of a Christmas wreath."
She adds:
"The Bush biography
reveals the story of a boy named for his father, sent to the exclusive
private school in the East where his father's reputation as star athlete
and later war hero were still remembered. The younger George's achievements
were dwarfed in the school's memory of his father. Athletically he could
not achieve his father's laurels, being smaller and perhaps less strong.
His drinking bouts and lack of intellectual gifts held him back as well.
His military record was mediocre as compared to his father's as well.
[He went AWOL] "
In Fortunate Son, Bush himself
explained: "Alcohol began to compete with my energies ... I'd lose
focus". Though he once said he couldn't remember a day he hadn't
had a drink, he quickly added the giveaway phrase that he didn't believe
he was "clinically alcoholic".
Van Wormer notes that "Bush
drank heavily for over 20 years until he made the decision to abstain
at age 40. About this time he became a 'born again Christian'
going as usual from one extreme to the other." When asked in an
interview about his reported cocaine use, he answered reasonably, "I'm
not going to talk about what I did 20 to 30 years ago".
One motive driving Dubya
could be his need "to prove himself to his father - to achieve
what his father failed to do - to finish the job of the Gulf War, to
get the 'evildoer' Saddam." Adds van Wormer, "His drive to
finish his father's battles is of no small significance, psychologically."
BRAIN DAMAGE
According to Van Wormer,
"scientists can now observe changes that occur in the brain as
a result of heavy alcohol and other drug abuse. Some of these changes
may be permanent."
Van Wormer characterizes
this damage as "barely noticeable but meaningful." Researchers
have found that brain chemistry irregularities caused by long bouts
of drinking or drug abuse cause "messages in one part of the brain
to become stuck there. This leads to maddening repetition of thoughts."
One of these powerful "stuck"
thoughts, says van Wormer, is that "President Bush seems unduly
focused upon getting revenge on Saddam Hussein ('He tried to kill my
Dad'), leading the country and the world into war, accordingly."
Grandiosity is another major
trait of former addicts brain-damaged by their addiction. Bush has reversed
the successful, five-decade old U.S. policy of containment and no first
strikes. Now he says, Americans can attack anyone, anywhere at any time
with any weapons of their choosing including banned cluster bomb
munitions, radioactive explosives and nuclear bombs.
AN AGENT OF ARMAGEDDON?
According to the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual, a person suffering from Narcissistic Personality
Disorder, "Has a grandiose sense of self-importance-exaggerates
achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without
commensurate achievements."
Sound familiar?
This personality is preoccupied
with fantasies of power and being loved. Such a person requires "automatic
compliance". He or she is "exploitative" of others, "lacks
empathy, is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and
needs of others." And also "shows arrogant, haughty behavior
or attitudes."
"This set of characteristics,"
says Dr. Wolman, not too reassuringly, "may describe Rumsfeld and
Cheney better than Dubya."
For those who, like Nobel
Prize winner Joseph Stieglitz, warn that Bush "has been captured
by a small group of ideologues, Dependent Personality Disorder
describes someone who "has difficulty making everyday decisions
without an excessive amount of advice and reassurance from others."
[CBC Feb. 10, 2003]
From a Jungian perspective,
writes Dr. Wolman, "Dubya may be identifying with an archetype
something out of Revelations, perhaps, whereby he sees himself
as an instrument of God's will to bring about Armageddon." Concurs
Katherine van Wormer, "To fight evil, Bush is ready to take on
the world, in almost a Biblical sense."
A PRESIDENTIAL PATHOLOGY
Is Bush's belligerence bent
on securing another oil fix? Katherine van Wormer believes that a Portland
peace protestor's sign, "Drunk on Power" nailed it. Says this
quiet Quaker, "The drive for power can be an unquenchable thirst,
addictive in itself."
Senator William Fulbright
agrees. His bestseller, The Arrogance of Power defined power politics
as the pursuit of power. "The causes and consequences of war may
have more to do with pathology than with politics," Fulbright wrote.
A key "dry drunk"
trait is impatience. Bush, who often describes himself as "a patient
man", is not. Just four weeks after inspectors went into Iraq,
he called for obliterating Baghdad. "If we wait for threats to
fully materialize", Bush pointed out to West Pointers, "we
will have waited too long". Translations: It's okay to attack projections
of our own fearful imaginings in case those phantom threats someday
become real.
Alan Bisbort's "Dry
Drunk - Is Bush Making a Cry for Help?" appeared in American Politics
Journal. Bisbort believes that Bush's "incoherence" when speaking
away from prepared scripts is a classic sign of addicted brain damage.
For Bisbort, another "dry
drunk" tip-off is Dubya's irritability with anyone who dares disagree
with him including Germany's new leader, who insists he is opposing
Bush's folly in Iraq as a concerned long-time friend of America. (Schroeder's
wife is American.)
Another "Dry drunk"
sign says van Wormer, is Dubya's "dangerous obsessing about only
one thing (Iraq) to the exclusion of all other things."
Van Wormer's bottom line
prognosis: "George W. Bush seems to possess the traits characteristic
of addictive persons who still have the thought patterns that accompany
substance abuse. The fact that some residual effects from his earlier
substance abuse - however slight - might cloud the U.S. President's
thinking and judgment is frightening, however, in the context of the
current global crisis."
DON'T LAUGH
The Toronto Star recounts
how NYU author and media critic Mark Crispin Miller attempted to catalogue
GW's verbal gaffes. Some favorites: "The vast majority of our imports
come from outside the country." "If we don't succeed, we run
the risk of failure."
"The future will be
better tomorrow."
"He meant it for a laugh,"
wrote the Star. "Not now."
The author of Boxed In: The
Culture of TV believes "Bush is not an imbecile. He's not a puppet.
I think that Bush is a sociopathic personality. I think he's incapable
of empathy. He has an inordinate sense of his own entitlement, and he's
a very skilled manipulator. And in all the snickering about his alleged
idiocy, this is what a lot of people miss."
Miller's judgment - that
an unelected president might suffer from a clinical personality disorder
- is much heavier than being called the global village idiot. "He
has no trouble speaking off the cuff when he's speaking punitively,
when he's talking about violence, when he's talking about revenge. When
he struts and thumps his chest, his syntax and grammar are fine,"
Miller mentions. "It's only when he leaps into the wild blue yonder
of compassion, or idealism, or altruism, that he makes these hilarious
mistakes."
Bush even has trouble repeating
comforting clichés. "Fool me once, shame ... shame on ...
you," Long, uncomfortable pause. "Fool me - can't get fooled
again!"
While the world was laughing,
Miller saw something darker. "What's revealing about this is that
Bush could not say, `Shame on me' to save his life. That's a completely
alien idea to him. This is a guy who is absolutely proud of his own
inflexibility and rectitude," wrote Miller.
Miller says that Bush saying,
"I know how hard it is to put food on your family" is not
'cause he's stupid, but "because he doesn't care about people who
can't put food on the table."
When Bush is envisioning
"a foreign-handed foreign policy," Miller contends it's because
he can't keep his focus on things that mean nothing to him. "When
he tries to talk about what this country stands for, or about democracy,
he can't do it," Miller observes.
According to Miller, this
is why GW is so closely watched by his handlers. "Not because he'll
say something stupid," the Star paraphrased, "but because
he'll overindulge in the language of violence and punishment at which
he excels."
"He's a very angry guy,
a hostile guy," Miller says. "He's much like Nixon. So they're
very, very careful to choreograph every move he makes. They don't want
him anywhere near protestors, because he would lose his temper."
Adds this media expert, "It would be a grave mistake to just play
him for laughs."
DEPRESSION CAN BE DANGEROUSLY DEPRESSING
Confronted by a man who will
not listen to anyone but a few "chickenhawks" urging worldwide
war, why shouldn't we feel depressed? Not surprisingly, we do.
Seventy percent of U.S. pastors
constantly fight depression. Right now, almost three million Canadians
are seriously depressed. (Multiply by four or five for approximate U.S.
figures.) We can't blame GW for this. Or the fact that suicide is the
3rd leading cause of death in 15 to 24 year olds. But as the man responsible
for perpetrating a worldwide bummer, George isn't helping! [www.tonycooke.org;
National Institute of Mental Health]
If it's politically incorrect
to ask these questions, how "correct" is it to launch 800
cruise missiles and thousands of one-ton bombs on a captive urban population
already suffering the ravages of deliberately imposed hunger and disease?
CHOKA COLA?
Another big clue to Dubya's
displays of dementia comes in "photo-ops" showing him slugging
back diet Coke with other Aspartame addicts, like Chicago's mayor Richard
Daley. Their beet red faces spell either embarrassment over Bush's hijacking
of America, or aspartame poisoning. [Chicago Sun Times, Sept. 27, 2002]
According to Carol Guilford,
an Aspartame expert and support worker, the President-Select's "pretzel"
pratfall was most likely an Aspartame seizure. Bush, like Carter, Al
Gore and millions of Americans, is addicted to this constant caffeine
hit. Among the FDA's listed 92 symptoms for Aspartame poisoning are:
"Difficulty Swallowing", "Fainting" and "Unconsciousness".
Bush's facial lesions, removed
as a result of "Too much sun" is another sign of Aspartame
poisoning. So was his recent knee surgery: Aspartame depletes synovial
fluid lubricating the joints.
Would you drink 6 to 12 cans
of formaldehyde a day? It turns out that methanol in Aspartame converts
to formaldehyde in the tissues. As Guildford wrote to USN Captain Eleanor
Marino, Physician to the President (Feb. 21, 2002): 10% of a 200mg can
of diet soda is straight methanol wood alcohol! Methanol is such a gross
cumulative poison, the EPA's limit for drinking water is 7.8 mg daily.
For serious addicts like Bush, the methanol intake can exceed 32 times
the EPA's recommended limit..
Now the punch line: Clinical
case studies shows that, among other symptoms, Aspartame ingestion results
in "mind fog", feeling "unreal", poor memory, confusion,
anxiety, irritability, depression, mania, and slurred speech. [Neurology
1994]
Alcohol-related brain damage
is not helped by chugging formaldehyde. James Turner, consumer protection
lawyer and author of The Chemical Feast learned that an Oct. 1980 FDA
inquiry found that the formaldehyde formed by Aspartame actually eats
microscopic holes and triggers tumors in the brain.
That finding banned Aspartame
from the food supply. But three months later, Searle CEO Donald Rumsfeld
told that pharma giant's sales staff he would get Aspartame approved
pronto. The next month, the FDA commissioner was replaced by Dr. Arthur
Hayes. In Nov. 1983 the FDA approved aspartame for soft drinks. Under
fire for accepting corporate bribes, Hayes went to work for Searle's
public-relations firm. Searle lawyer Robert Shapiro coined the name
NutraSweet. Monsanto bought Searle. Rumsfeld received $12 million for
his help. Shapiro now heads Monsanto.
The same "revolving
door" swings wide for arms makers and the oil mafia. The Big Question
is: Why hasn't Dick warned George that the diet drinks he's swilling
are eating his brain and making him crazy?
Crazy? Am I calling the President-Select
of the Excited States crazy? Not me. As a journalist, I can only point
out that published medical evidence goes frighteningly far in explaining
GW's behavior. For certain, this good ol' boy should go in for a brain
scan before being allowed to command more firepower than the next 11
nations combined. If George W. Bush is not crazy - he's sure acting
like it.
This article first appeared
in Willthomas.net