The
Internet Under Surveilance
By Vinton
G. Cerf
Reporters Without
Borders
01 July, 2003
Truth is a powerful solvent.
Stone walls melt before its relentless might. The Internet is one of
the most powerful agents of freedom. It exposes truth to those who wish
to see and hear it. It is no wonder that some governments and organizations
fear the Internet and its ability to make the truth known. The phrase
"freedom of speech" is often used to characterize a key element
of democratic societies : open communication and especially open government.
But freedom of speech is less than half of the equation. It is also
vital that citizens have the freedom to hear and see. It is the latter
area in which many governments have intervened in an attempt to prevent
citizens from gaining access to information that their governments wish
to withhold from them.
The equation is even more
complex than simply speaking and hearing or writing and reading. The
Internet is much like a piece of paper. The paper is unaware of what
is written upon it. The Internet is equally oblivious. It delivers information
and misinformation with equal facility. Thus it can become a tool for
the delivery of bad data. Worse, this effect may be propagated less
by design than by ignorance. It surprises me how often I will find a
strident warning in my email inbox forwarded to me by some who should
know better, proclaiming that the post office is going to start charging
for email or that Microsoft will pay for the forwarding of each copy
of the enclosed message. These are all hoaxes but readers are too lazy
or perhaps too stupid to take the time to check before they forward.
The antidote for bad information
is not censorship but more and better information. Of course, this places
a burden on the consumer of information to pay attention and to think
critically about what is seen and heard. Surely this is what a responsible
citizen should be doing. And surely this is what we should be teaching
our children at home and at school.
Despite its great promise,
the Internet is not, in and of itself, a guarantor of the free flow
of information. George Soros, the well-known financier, takes pains
to remind us that the freedom offered by the Internet can be taken away.
Indeed, what you will read in the pages that follow illustrates exactly
this point. Many governments do want to limit the information its citizens
can reach. In some cases the motivations are understandable and even
laudable. I can see no redeeming value in child pornography for example
and I support efforts to expunge it from the Internet. But those of
us living in free societies have been warned repeatedly that censorship
is a slippery slope and must be treated with the greatest care.
Even in the worst cases of
content abuse, the slope beckons. For example, attempts by governments
to extend their jurisdiction beyond their national borders poses a significant
threat. More than once, ISPs have been ordered by courts in country
A to eliminate content on servers in country B. This extra-territorial
gambit leads into a thorny legal thicket into which we should not want
to go.
To borrow a phrase from the
venture capital world, free citizens must exercise due diligence to
assure that their governments are not hiding political censorship behind
a putative moral facade. One is reminded of one government's attempt
to shut down thousands of Internet cafes on the grounds that one of
them had fire law violations and therefore all the others might also
be hazardous. This struck me as disingenuous at best and insulting to
the intelligence of the citizenry at worst.
I see many responsibilities
on the table for effective use of the Internet. Citizens must do their
best to guard against government censorship for political purposes.
At the same time, they are responsible for trying to distinguish useful
and truthful information from bad quality information and must therefore
exercise critical thinking about what they see and hear. And that responsibility
extends to all media, not only the Internet. Moreover, where disinformation
or misinformation exists, thoughtful citizens have a responsibility
to draw attention to the problem, possibly even to provide information
to counteract the bad data.
Furthermore, citizens must
bear in mind that not all relevant information is online and that thoroughness
dictates examination of material from other sources than the Internet
before concluding that due diligence has been taken. One can imagine
a briar patch of legal problems for medical caregivers should they rely
solely on Internet-based information in diagnosis and treatment of disease
and injury. Nor should patients imagine that they have limned the standard
of care with a casual web search or that they have uncovered a miracle
cure in a web site that trumpets its obscure and unsubstantiated treatment.
There are no electronic filters
that separate truth from fiction. No cognitive "V-chip" to
sort the gold from the lead. We have but one tool to apply : critical
thinking. This truth applies as well to all other communication media,
not only the Internet. Perhaps the World Wide Web merely forces us to
see this more clearly than other media. The stark juxtaposition of valuable
and valueless content sets one to thinking. Here is an opportunity to
educate us all. We truly must think about what we see and hear. We must
evaluate and select. We must choose our guides.
In this 21st century information
age, Internauts have significant responsibilities. They must guard against
abusive censorship and counteract misinformation. They must take responsibility
for thoughtful use of the Internet and the World Wide Web and all of
the information services and appliances yet to come. Free flow of information
has a price and responsible Internauts will shoulder the burden of paying
it.
Read
The Full Report In PDF format