The Ugly Case:
NHRC Of Nepal
By ACHR Review
11 August, 2005
ACHR Review
Our mission is to develop a culture of human rights in the
country by taking a leading role as an independent and impartial national
institution for the protection and promotion of human rights in accordance
with universally recognized human rights principles - The mission
of Strategic Plan (2003-2008) of the National Human Rights Commission
of Nepal, finalized on 25 November 2003. [1]
The
National Human Rights Commission of Nepal which played a crucial role
to monitor human rights violations both by the security forces and the
Maoists since its inception today stands as the most discredited National
Human Rights Institution in the Asia Pacific region. The Commission
was established in 2000 when the Maoists movement had engulfed
the nation. While NHRC could do little to enforce its recommendations,
its voice resonated across the country. Today, it appears to be another
institution created by the King Gyanendra since his bloodless coup on
1 February 2005.
Like most governmental
institutions in Nepal, the present members of the NHRC too were appointed
under an ordinance in May 2005. Section 4(1) of the Human Rights Act
of 2053 (1997) provides that His Majesty the King shall appoint the
Chairperson and Members of the Commission upon the recommendation of
a Recommendation Committee comprising of the Prime Minister, the Chief
Justice and the Leader of the Opposition in the House of Representative.
As King Gyanendra
dissolved the parliament in May 2002, there is no leader of the opposition.
King Gyanendra made another illegal move to introduce an Ordinance on
18 May 2005 to amend section 4(2) of the Human Rights Commission Act
to change the composition of the Recommendation Committee. [2] The new
members were subsequently appointed.
In the new dispensation,
Justice Nayan Bahadur Khatri has been suitably rewarded for supporting
the Royal coup. [3] NHRC chairman Nayan Bahadur Khatri was quoted as
saying, It is the duty of all the organs of the state to fulfill
the essence of the royal proclamation. [4]
Since NHRC has lost
its credibility, the new members have an uphill task to restore the
same. Its work is already undermined by a High-level nine-member Committee
for the Protection of Human Rights (CPHR) set up by King Gyanendra on
16 March 2005 to to assist the NHRC in monitoring and investigating
human rights issues. Headed by the Attorney General, Prof Pawan
Kumar Ojha, the other members of the CPHR include the secretaries of
the Ministries for Home, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Law, Justice and
Parliamentary Affairs, Women, Children and Social Welfare, Ministry
of Local Development, Ministry of Education and the National Director
at the Human Rights Promotion Centre. The Secretary at the Office of
the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers is the committees
member- secretary. [5]
On 24 March 2005,
Justice Khatri claimed that NHRC was monitoring and probing human
rights violations throughout the country without any problem.
[6] This despite that on 5 March 2005, a three-member team of the National
Human Rights Commission was prevented by the security forces at the
Tribhuvan International Airport from boarding a flight to Bhairahawa
on its way to Kapilvastu district to investigate the clashes between
the locals and Maoists in the district. The NHRC team was prevented
despite giving prior information to the Home Ministry and all concerned
authorities about the scheduled visit. [7] From 17 to 23 February 2005,
22 alleged Maoists were lynched and about 700 houses of the alleged
Maoists sympathizers burnt down in Kapilavastu district. [8]
NHRCs recommendations
reflect its current self-censorship mode. After investigation into the
killings by the vigilantes in Kapilavastu, NHRC failed to mention the
number of persons killed or identify the culprits. [9] In its report
on Kapilavastu killings, NHRC passed the buck on the government and
recommended a probe by the government. [10]
However, in the
case of killing of 10 civilians, including a 14-year-old child on 15
April 2005 by the Maoists at Baragdawa of Somni VDC in Nawalparasi district,
NHRC was quick to award compensation. [11] A two-member team of the
NHRC comprising of Murari Kharel and Madhav Gautam visited the affected
areas on 18 April 2005 [12] and held that the Maoists attacked the village
to avenge the murder of five lower caste people by a Maoist Resistance
Committee accusing them of being Maoists. The NHRC reported that about
25 Chamars fled their homes after the resistant committee killed the
members of their community and set on fire their houses. The NHRC recommended
that the government provide Rs 1,50,000 each to the bereaved families.
[13]
The NHRC chief also
claimed that the Emergency was not affecting the Commissions functioning.
Addressing a press meet on 24 June 2005, NHRC Chairman Nayan Bahadur
Khatri again claimed total independence of NHRC and that NHRC had not
faced any type of obstructions from any side. [14]
On 8 April 2005,
the police denied access to the NHRC team consisting of commissioner
Kapil Shrestha to meet the detainees at ward police office at Tinkune,
Kathmandu. [15] Similarly, on 26 April 2005, security personnel barred
a NHRC team of observers from meeting political detainees at Pahara
Battalion detention centre at Tripureshwor in Kathmandu, where dozens
of political leaders and cadres including Nepali Congress (Democratic)
leader and former minister Prakash Man Singh had been kept. Security
officers said they were ordered from above not to allow
human rights observe into the detention centre. [16]
Worst, Asian Centre
for Human Rights has learnt from the reliable sources that the email
communications of the international consultants to the National Human
Rights Commission are being monitored with the knowledge of some members.
The NHRC of Nepal has virtually turned into another spook agency.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] . http://www.nhrc-nepal.org/docs/Annual_Report_English_2004.pdf
[2] . Govt. amends
Human Rights Commission Act, Kantipur Online, 21 May 2005
[3] . NHRC chief
blames parties, defends royal move, Nepal News.com, 17 April 2005
[4] . Protection
of human rights a major challenge: NHRC, Nepal News.com, 9 February
2005
[5] . CPHR formed
to assist NHRC, The Kathmandu Post, 19 March 2005
[6] . Emergency
not affecting NHRC, says its chief, The Himalayan Times, 25 March 2005
[7] . NHRC member
prevented from traveling, The Kathmandu Post, 6 March 2005
[8] . http://www.achrweb.org/reports/Nepal/Nepal0105.pdf
[9] . http://www.achrweb.org/briefingpapers/Nepal-BP-07-09_05_HTML.htm#_Toc100660632
[10] . NHRC urges
govt to probe Kapilvastu violence, The Kathmandu Post, 2 April 2005
[11] . Maoists kill
10 civilians, The Himalayan Times, 17 April 2005
[12] . NHRC team
leaves for Nawalparasi to probe Maoist attack, The Himalayan Times,
19 April 2005
[13] . NHRC slams
Army, Maoists; seeks aid for victims kin, The Himalayan Times,
17 May 2005
[14] . NHRC is totally
independent: Khatri, Nepal News.com, 24 June 2005
[15] . NHRC denied
access at detention center, Kantipur Online, 9 April 2005
[16] . NHRC team
barred from meeting detainees, Nepalnews.com, 26 April 2005