CC Malayalam Blog

Join News Letter

Iraq

Peak Oil

Climate Change

US Imperialism

Palestine

Latin America

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Globalisation

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Gujarat Pogrom

WSF

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

Submission Policy

Contact Us

Subscribe To Our
News Letter

Name: E-mail:

 

Can The Real Shekhawat
Ever Stand Up?

By Subhash Gatade

25 June, 2007
Countercurrents.org

( “There will be a Gujarat-like situation in Rajasthan if the State Government did not stop its ‘appeasement of Muslims’ and ‘anti-Hindu’ policies.”
- Bhairon Singh Shekhawat, former Rajasthan chief minister, Gangapur on 23 April, The Hindu, 30 April 2002.)

The elections for the post of the President of India have rather opened up a free for all what is known in colloquial Hindi as Khula Khel Farrukhabadi. The saffron sympathetic journos in the media have rather taken upon themselves the onerous task of excavating the past of the UPA candidate for the post Ms Pratibha Patil. Days in and days out we are being bombarded with stories laced with usual melodrama about alleged acts of omission and commission on part of the presidential nominee of UPA.

While a latest writeup in a national daily (24 June 2007, Indian Express) has a few things to tell about Ms Patil's statement as minister on the floor of the house of Maharashtra assembly, a press conference organised at the house of a member of Akali Dal the other day presented details about the allged role of Ms Patil in the coverup of a murder case. It is a different matter that official spokesperson of BJP feigned ignorance about their role in facilitating the conference despite the fact that it was held at the residence of a NDA constituent and was attended by Mr Sudheendra Kulkarni, a close confidant of Advani.

There is no denying the fact that there is a task cut out for the investigating agencies to look into the veracity of the claims so that truth could be separated from chaff.

Of course the naivette on part of Ms Pratibha Patil - which was very much visible in her controversial remarks about genesis of veil - have also unfolded a situation where she has continued to remain a focus of attention , altogether for wrong reasons.

But in this rigmarole for the post of President, the other contestant for the top post Mr Bhairon Singh Shekhawat, the present incumbent to the post of Vice-President, has saved himself from any scrutiny. And despite being in a miserable position as far as game of numbers was concerned he seems happy smiling receiving accolades from unknown quarters for his 'secular' credentials. The other day Maulana Madni, who was with Uttarakhand Congress till recently and who had to quit his post because of pressures put by the fanatic elements of the Hindutva brigade even went to meet him and declare his support for him for being the only fit candidate for the post.

Neither anyone is ready to reach the kernel of truth and understand for her/himself a die-hard RSS worker's allged metamorphosis into a 'secular' person nor anyone seems concerned to undertake this task. It appears that the blurring of reality which is a bane of the media seems to have caught the anti-communal formations as well.

Nobody seems to recapitulate Mr Bhairon Singh Shekhawat's his highly controversial statement warning the state government to desist from 'appeasement of Muslims' if it wants to avoid a 'Gujarat type situation' when the genocide in Gujarat was on. And nobody seems to remember the manner in which he graced the occasion of the birth anniversary celebrations of Golwalkar, the second Supremo of RSS, while he was still a Vice President of India. People very well know that M.S. Golwalkar, was a strong supporter of ethnic cleansing done by the Nazis which he openly glorified in his book 'We Or Our Nationhood Defined' (1939), who yearned for a Manusmriti like regime which condemned Dalits and Women to a secondary status and who opposed the making of Constitution under the leadership of the legendary Dr Ambedkar and had strongly contended that Manusmriti be made the new constitution of independent India. Golwalkar's highlly dubious role at the time of partition wherein he even instigated violence against the minorities is also a wellknown fact.

In his message to the special issue of 'Organiser' on Golwalkar, Shekhawat wrote :

Shri Guruji was a staunch nationalist and an impassioned patriot who had contributed immensely in varied spheres of nation building activities with great distinction. A scholar of eminence, he symbolised the Sanatani ideals. Guruji dedicated his entire life for the enduring welfare of the country and the people.( March 26, 2006 Organiser)

Interestingly neither the secular-democratic formations nor all those people who yearn for giving a befitting reply to the communal forces have deemed it necessary to take a look at the five decade old political career of Mr Shekhawat to see for themselves how his 'moderate' image has helped strengthen the 'lunatic fringe' of the Sangh Parivar in the polity and society of the state.It appears that they have also been carried away by the supposedly impartial handling of the upper house by Mr Shekhawat or the media-savvy soft spoken image of Mr Shekhawat, who it is known was successful in engineering cross-voting from the then opposition camp during elections to the post of Vice-President held in 2002.

On the other hand a concerted attempt - with due support from the saffron journos - seems to be on to present him as an 'apostle' of secularism and a man who with his 'impartial handling' of the upper house has become a logical claimant for the top post of the Indian republic. And these people have rec'd ready help from some elements in the Muslim community who are batting for him to settle their personal scores with Congress or who want to demonstrate their disenchantment with the growing soft hindutva streak in its politics.

It is clear that three time chief minister of Rajasthan ( 22 June 1977- 16 Feb 1980, 4 March 1990- 15 Dec 1992 and 4 th Dec 1993- 29 Nov 1998) and leader of opposition for a considerable portion of the remaining period Bhairon Singh Shekhawat can be said to the the central figure in the development of BJP-RSS in the state. If today the state appears to be a bastion of Hindutva politics where minorities are under growing attack , civil society has no qualms in practising caste apartheid and the bureaucracy finds itself highly communalised his role in this transformation needs to be underlined..
One still remebers the November 1997 issue of Communalism Combat wherein the Combat had exposed the growing violence against women in Rajasthan under BJP rule. The then BJP chief minister, Bhairon Singh Shekhawat and his deputy chief minister, Hari Shankar Bhabhra, had justified incidents of rape, acid throwing and molestation. (‘Why talk of humans, even gods cannot be sure of a woman’s character’— Bhabhra).
Bhairon Singh Shekhawat's continued protection of obscurantist values is evident from many actions. People's Democracy (22 September 2002) had underlined :

Along with the ruling political elite, the administrative machinery too is permeated with a deep-rooted bias.When Roop Kanwar was burnt alive in 1987, top political leaders like Bhairon Singh Shekhawat and Rajmata Scindia and some state government officials had visited the site to offer their prayers.

The year 2001 was witness to the serious attempts on part of the BJP-RSS to replicate the Gujarat model of Hindu Rashtra in the then Congress ruled Rajasthan. And the most ominous had been the 'Trishul Diksha Samarohs' organised by the Bajrang Dal through which such trishuls which were in fact Rampuri knives were distributed in lakhs. In public meeting the then Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot had charged that more than 40 lakhs trishuls have been distributed in different parts of the state. It was for everyone to see that government agencies, administration as well as the police had come under severe strain due to the well coordinated actions and campaigns by RSS, Shiv Sena, VHP and Bajrang Dal which was aided and abetted by the parliamentary wing of the Hindu extremists — the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Teesta Setalvad had quoted a leading journalist in her writeup on Communalisation of Rajasthan ( Nov 2001, Communalism Combat) :

“Nine years, in totality, of BJP rule has been used by the party leadership to successfully infiltrate echelons of the administration and the police,” Sriprakash Sharma, senior journalist and editor of Rashtradoot told CC. “Even now, sections of the top cadre of the IAS and the IPS visit the former BJP chief minister Bhairon Singh Shekhawat and the latter publicly flaunts this as he did a few weeks ago at Diwali.”.

Looking at the feverish attempts to construct a new common sense around Mr Shekhawat it is high time that students of Rajasthan politics go into the details of Mr Shekhawat's 55 year old political career to let the people know how his 'moderate' image has facilitated the growing dominance of Hindutva fanatic elements in the Rajasthani society.

In fact one finds a lot of commonality between the images of Vajpayee and Shekhawat as opposed to Advani and Modi. While the moderate looking Vajpayee could adorn the high seats of power for his moderate image with due support from 'secular' sounding formations , Shekhawat also seems to be marching on the same route.

It is a different matter that when the need arose a 'moderate' Vajpayee had no qualms in castigating the religious minorites to suit his purpose. The world very well remembers how in its Goa meeting Vajpayee, the then Prime Minister of India had taunted and chided Muslims by saying “wherever they are, they live separately”, and nonchalantly asserted: “If a conspiracy had not been hatched to burn alive the innocent passengers of the Sabarmati Express [at Godhra], the subsequent tragedy in Gujarat could have been averted. But this did not happen.” He then rhetorically asked: “But who lit the fire?”

Not to be left behind Shekhawat had declared “There will be a Gujarat-like situation in Rajasthan if the State Government did not stop its ‘appeasement of Muslims’ and ‘anti-Hindu’ policies.”

email : [email protected]


Leave A Comment
&
Share Your Insights

Comment Policy


Digg it! And spread the word!



Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So, as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.



 

Get CC HeadlinesOn your Desk Top

 

Search Our Archive



Our Site

Web

Online Users