Home To Asia's Biggest
Club Of Billionaires
And Half Of The World's Poor
By Dipankar Bhattacharya
13 April, 2007
we are told that our economy is growing annually at an impressive 8
per cent per annum, we wonder what it is all about and where it disappears
without leaving any trace in our daily lives. The latest Forbes list
of global billionaires gives us some clue to resolve this riddle. According
to this list there are 946 billionaire families in the world today and
there are as many as 36 Indian names in this club of the world's wealthiest.
This is 14 more than the number of Indians who had made it to the Forbes
list last year, and the combined wealth of these 36 families amounts
to $ 191 billion, which is one-fourth of India's GDP.
And how have the Indian billionaires
grown compared to the 2006 list? Here are some samples: Mukesh Ambani
has jumped from $ 7 bn to $ 20.1 bn, his brother Anil from $ 5 bn to
$ 18.2 bn, Azim Premji (of Wipro) from $ 11 bn to $ 17.1, Kushal Pal
Singh (of DLF) from $ 5 bn to $ 10 bn, Sunil Mittal (of Bharati Telecom)
$ 4.9 to $ 9.5 bn and Kumar Birla $ 4.4 bn to $ 8 bn! In other words,
the combined wealth of these six families alone has registered a record
increase of $ 45 bn in just one year! This is of course only part of
the story of corporate India's stunning accumulation of wealth, for
the likes of Ratan Tata who controls the huge Tata empire that has acquired
several big companies in recent months the most notable being the $
11 bn acquisition of Corus by Tata Steel, are conspicuously absent in
the Forbes billionaires' list.
With this kind of astounding
leap in accumulation of private wealth, India has now overtaken Japan.
With 24 billionaires accounting for $ 64 bn, only a third of the combined
wealth of India's 36, Japan has now lost its place as home to the largest
number of Asian billionaires. This dubious distinction now belongs to
India. In fact, India now accounts for three among the top 20 billionaires
in the world, next only to the United States which is home to five.
It is another matter that India's wealthiest billionaire Laxmi Mittal,
who figures fifth in the global list, operates not from India but from
the United Kingdom.
The Indian list is more than
reflective of the global mix of billionaires. The march of India's billionaires
is powered as much by the booming real estate business as by IT and
telecommunications. Among India's 36 billionaires, there are five from
the real estate sector with a combined wealth of $24.5 billion (Kushal
Pal Singh of DLF, Ramesh Chandra of Unitech, Pallonji Mistry of Shapoorji
Pallonji Group, Vikas Oberoi of Oberoi Construction and Pradeep Jain
of Parsvnath Developers). The infotech/software sector too accounts
for five Indian entries on the Forbes list (Azim Premji of Wipro, Shiv
Nadar of HCL and three from Infosys - N.R. Narayana Murthy, Nandan Nilekani
and Senapathy Gopalakrishnan) with a combined wealth of $25.4 billion.
Our governments and pro-liberalisation economists never tire of telling
us the trickle-down stories and would have us believe that the accumulation
of wealth at the top is the surest and quickest way of 'development'
at the base of the socio-economic pyramid we live in. The truth is actually
the reverse. The mirror image of accumulation of wealth at one pole
is the concentration of poverty at the other end. While Marxism explains
this dichotomy in terms of the paradox between growing socialization
of production (backed amply by technology-induced increases in productivity)
and private appropriation of profit (and consequent accumulation of
wealth) and shows the revolutionary way out by abolishing the rule of
private wealth, one does not have to be a Marxist to see through the
deception of the trickle-down gospel.
The UNDP's annual Human Development
Report, for instance, is enough to expose the growing hiatus between
the rising fortunes of the billionaire brigade of 'Shining India' and
the pathetic human development indices that characterize the real India.
The UNDP has been compiling these indices since 1990 and in terms of
the human development index (which combines factors like life expectancy,
school enrolment, public hygiene and standard of living), the UNDP's
2006 report still places India at the 126th position in a list of 177
countries. The country that accounts for three among the world's top
twenty billionaires remains home to half the world's poor and the starving
while nearly half of India's children below five remain suffer from
This coexistence of the super-rich and the underfed has all along been
a characteristic feature of capitalism. The developed countries with
their welfare policies have managed to contain the mismatch within certain
'tolerable limits', but the disparity remains explosive in countries
like India, and also in Russia where predatory capitalism has returned
with a vengeance on the debris of the erstwhile socialist state. Today
a 'resurgent' Russia has 53 billionaires in the global list (only 2
shy of Germany), much ahead of Japan's 24, but the Human Development
Report 2006 places Russia (which still has the historical benefits of
seventy years of socialism) at the 65th place and India (which is still
weighed down by its history of two hundred years of colonial plunder)
down by another sixty-odd notches while Japan is ranked 7th in terms
of human development. Incidentally, the country that tops the human
development list - Norway - has only four entries in the global billionaire
list of 946!
[Dipankar Bhattacharya is
the General Secretary of the CPI(ML)]
here to comment
on this article