A
Tribute To M A Khan
By Vidya Bhushan Rawat
03 February, 2007
Countercurrents.org
He
was a mobile Information Centre of Sonbhadra district in eastern part
of Uttar-Pradesh, whose work during the past thirty years was utilized
by those who do not have time to visit the villages and follow up the
stories after they started. M.A.Khan was always cheerful related to
his work, his love for the Adivasis and his conviction against the child
labour, brought him close touch of the ground reality. His only concern
was that 'agencies outside Sonbhadra were using the ignorance and poverty
of the poor people for their own purposes and not with an aim to lift
the tribals and end poverty which they can very much do. Once the project
was over, these agencies left the tribal for their own good.' For the
past few years, Khan in his every interaction with me displayed his
disappointment of how the international donor agencies find their people
and agencies in these regions but never found Khan and his Chaupal which
had been fairly active in the region.
In a two days human rights
consultation in Delhi, when I was informing a friend about Khan and
his impeccable credentials for fighting the rights of the common man
in Sonbhadra district, a shocking news was revealed by another friend
that M.A.Khan passed away, a day before, on 27th of January 2007, in
Varanasi. I was dumb and shocked to hear this. Just a fortnight ago,
I spoke to him on his mobile when he told me that Doctors have found
symptoms of cancer in him and that he wish to be transferred to AIIMS
in Delhi. That time, the first thought in my mind was that this news
would be wrong and hence I said ' Khan Saheb, you will get well soon.
AIIMS is not the same as it used to be. If people like you are here
who speak for the poor Dalits and marginalized, I do not know whether
the doctors who do politics and not the treatment, would treat you well
or not.'
M.A.Khan was quintessentially
a secular activist with strong left leaning. He was not fit in the glamour
world of NGOs where you are fixed in certain style of format and report
as per it. Though, his documentation of events, custodial deaths, cases
of torture of Adivasis and forest dwellers in Sonbhadra would remain
unparallel. At a time, when NGOs masquerading to be human rights organization
splash information with the purpose of publicity and not to really help
the poor, Khan was refreshingly different with his people centric approach.
He would walk down the villages, record the narratives of the victims
and finally take them to the related authorities in the district and
even file petition in the court. In fact, he had formed a group of lawyers
in Sonbhadra who used to take such cases of illegal detentions of the
tribal in the name of naxalism.
Born in 1946 in a Zamindar
family of Robertsganj, Khan went to Deoband to earn a degree in Fazil
and then he completed his masters. He worked very hard during the 1967
famine in the region. In 1968 he joined Communist Party of India and
started Pragatisheel Kisan Manch (progressive farmer's forum). He continued
to travel around the villages and help the needy. In 1985 he founded
Jan Sewa Kendra to assist the poor of his region.
It was his concern about
the growing landless situation in Sonbhadra that he traveled around
500 villages of his district to understand the condition and found that
tribal were living in utter misery. Their land being occupied by others
and that they did not have two-time meal to eat. He felt that they lacked
information regarding their rights. He found that the ignorance of the
people was the biggest obstacle in their development and the officers
were misusing it. In fact, one of his candid remarks was that despite
huge funds flowing to NGOs in Sonbhadra and Varanasi, the condition
of the poor and their rights remain the same. He would laugh and say
that the NGOs have not come to remove the poverty of the people but
their own poverty. 'Chaupal', a village initiative to discuss and resolve
their problem by the villagers took shape during this period. He would
form a team of 8 members in every village who would discuss their issues
and carry the information to the central office in Robertsganj. Chaupal
worked in 80 villages. Khan Saheb new it very well that it was difficult
to run an organization without resources. Often, the big fishes would
catch the members of Chaupal for their own purposes. He started getting
depressed because of the growing commercialization of the civil society
movement where the powerful elite had gathered all the NGOs in the name
of 'poor'. In the region of eastern Uttar-Pradesh where dirty tricks
among the NGOs are the best practices, where NGOs are run by powerful
connections and castes, Khan remain a grounded man. Very much down trodden
who with the help of a few committed lawyers tried to do help the tribal.
Despite hailing from a Zamaindar
family, Khan did not have much land and property at the end. He had
a small typewriter where he would type reports of malfunctioning of
the government department. If a tribal girl or woman would come to him,
he would type their application and go along with them to submit it
to the relevant authorities. He would nicely take a copy of the same
in his file. And this was his regular practice. The habit resulted in
one of the best documentation, which was hardly recognized and which
remain thoroughly unpaid, that I had ever seen. It was this information,
which proved volatile for police once upon a time and his office was
burnt and valuable information got lost. Nevertheless, after that, he
started working from him home and still had huge piles of files, meticulously
maintained in his drawer.
For me he was a great source
of information. He would send his well-written reports on issues as
important as custodial deaths, National Rural Employment Guarantee programme,
land and forest issues to be send to national and international agencies
for lobbying. He felt betrayed that his work was not recognized by the
international community leave along the donor agencies who have their
own criteria for support.
Apart from sending these
reports, which Khan was really very committed, the thing, which was
very admirable about him, was his concern for the natural resources
of the people and how they lost it to big companies and local feudal
elements! His stories, many of which remain unpublished would be treasure
to learn how the state and its apparatus have sucked the blood of tribal
over the year. He had detailed information about how forest department
captured the land of the tribal and how the NGOs from outside did not
have enough information about it and they flash information and leave
the place making the lives of the tribal more vulnerable to exploitation.
I had promised to him to get them published in future. In fact, I introduced
him to Hum Dalit, a monthly journal, which regularly published his well
thought out articles.
I still remember the day
when the villagers had come to protest in front of the district collector
and all of them showed the food product they had been eating. The district
Magistrate did not turn up but send his deputy and several forest officials.
Seeing the tribal displaying their food produce the SDM became angry
and said ' you sale our poverty abroad. You have no business do that.
Go back.' The forest department officers were equally angry and blamed
Khan that he was responsible for misguiding them, a charge which Khan
openly denied. Khan stood by the people all the time.
Being a local citizen of
Sonbhadra, his house was always open for the tribal and Dalits of the
region. Women would come to his house, get their work done and go back
satisfying. In fact, for many of them, he was their father, who had
performed the 'kanyadaan' during the marriage.
Once, I asked him why doesn't
he work on the 'communal issues'. As usual he said ' I always feel my
heart with the Adivasis of Sonbhadra. I never feel that I am different
from them. They have been cheated by the regularly. The government has
done very little for them. If they retaliate they are charged with being
Naxalites and cases are filed against them.' In fact one of the work
that Khan did was to fight for a young 12 years old boy who was charged
under POTA. This is tragic how police behave. Sonbhadra district is
notorious for police highhandedness since they are unable to take on
the Naxal, they exploit the helpless villagers.
It was therefore not surprising
that the man who was arrested many time as well as whose office was
burnt by the police in the name of alleged link with naxalites, did
not find any favor from the donor agencies in their work for the region.
He would always say that
the village needs to connect with international community. The idea
of his Chaupal was to flood the authorities with complaints and information
about the villages and the people and their problems. He would always
ask me that internet and computers should linked to village and they
would empower the poor people and reduce their dependency others to
write letters for them as well as it will also enable the international
community to see things at their own rather then being shown.
M A Khan remains simple all
through his life. He was an anguished man that he could not communicate
and write in English language and felt that it was the reason why people
like him remain outside the net of those who matter. While, not many
have had opportunity to hear him internationally, for the thousands
of tribal people, he was one of their own, very own father figure, who
went out of his way to help them and gave them a sense of dignity and
honour. Like a lone man struggling in utterly difficult circumstances,
he left a legacy of his work but no second rank leadership since he
himself remained penniless till his end, struggling to get resources
for his medication. That is the biggest irony of those work in the grassroots
that they work for all and at the end they remain aloof from the world.
None care to listen their problems and perhaps very few to bother that
a committed man is no more. Since nobody care to inquire about each
other particularly those come from not powerful families, there remain
no news about them. It is tragic and it should end. The best tribute
to MA Khan would be to strengthen the ideas that he gave and carry on
his message of Chaupal so that the rural poor is saved from the a contemptuous
bureaucracy as well as local middlemen who thrive on their ignorance.
--
Vidya Bhushan Rawat
Visit my blog at
www.manukhsi.blogspot.com
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights