Peace
Groups Angry At Police Slur
By Jonathan Cook
21 December,
2008
Countercurrents.org
Nazareth:
Jewish peace groups have accused the Israeli police of fuelling
racism by cancelling a “Jewish Pride” march by a far-right
group that was to have taken place through one of the largest Arab
towns in Israel.
The police postponed the march, due last Monday, claiming they had
evidence extremist residents of Umm al Fahm in northern Israel would
open fire on the marchers and police.
“There was a real danger that lives could be lost,” said
a police spokesman, adding that the decision to ban the march would
be reassessed in two weeks.
But local Arab leaders and Jewish peace activists claimed the police
concocted the story to justify the cancellation of the march. Thousands
of Jews had planned to form a human chain with the residents of Umm
al Fahm at the entrance to the town to block the way of the Jewish
National Front.
Adam Keller, of the peace group Gush Shalom, said the planned show
of solidarity would have been non-violent. He denounced the police
for exploiting the stereotype of violent Arab citizens promoted by
the marchers, many of whom are hardline settlers in the West Bank.
“It is a supreme irony that we had organised for thousands of
Arabs and Jews to prove we can live here as citizens in harmony,”
he said. “Then the police cancel the march but use the false
pretext that the marchers are in danger rather than that they seek
to inflame violence.”
Claims by the police that Arab residents would shoot at the marchers
were derided by Jewish and Arab organisations.
Jafar Farah, of the Mossawa parliamentary lobbying group, pointed
out that the northern police force had used a similar excuse –
that Arab demonstrators were armed – in Oct 2000, at the start
of the intifada, to justify its use of live ammunition against protests
in Arab communities.
A later state inquiry examining the deaths of 13 Arab demonstrators
at the hands of the police found that they were unarmed. The inquiry
concluded that the institutional view of the police was that Israel’s
1.2 million-strong Arab population should be treated as “an
enemy” rather than as citizens.
“The lessons from that inquiry have still not been learnt,”
Mr Farah said. “There is still a culture of hatred in the police
force as well as a culture of incitement. In their different way,
the police want to de-legitimise the country’s Arab minority
just as much as the marchers.”
The Jewish National Front is widely seen as a reinvention of the Kach
movement, a Jewish terror organisation demanding the expulsion of
Palestinians from both Israel and the West Bank. The movement was
outlawed in the 1990s.
Kach tried to stage a march to Umm al Fahm in 1984 but was repulsed
when Jews and Arabs turned out on a large scale.
The police opposed the new march from the outset, saying it believed
that confrontations between the marchers and local residents might
provoke riots across the north, especially in the wake of violence
between Jews and Arabs in Acre in October.
The Supreme Court overruled the police, agreeing with the Front that
their right to free expression was being curtailed.
Mr Keller said he believed the police had opposed the march because
of the exorbitant cost of bringing thousands of police officers to
the town.
“They needed an excuse to prevent the march but one that would
be acceptable to the Jewish public and which would not look like they
were ignoring the court’s ruling. They resorted to the easiest
– and most dangerous – pretext available: that Umm al
Fahm is a hotbed of terror.”
Itamar Ben Gvir, a Front leader and settler involved in the recent
clashes with the Israeli army over the evacuation of a settler-occupied
Palestinian house in Hebron, called the police decision “a disgrace
to the rule of law”. He added: “Today the police have
proved once and for all that they do not control Umm al Fahm.”
Shuli Dichter, the head of the Sikkuy coexistence group and a resident
of a kibbutz near Umm al Fahm, called that suggestion “nonsense”.
“At the weekend we organised tours for hundreds of Jews to Umm
al Fahm. They shopped and visited attractions without any trouble
whatsoever. We proved that Jews are welcome in Umm al Fahm and that
the violence comes only from the far-right.”
Raja Aghbariyya, the head of Islamic Youth Movement in Umm al Fahm,
expressed a view widely shared in the town: “We welcome anyone
who comes to visit the city, but not according to the relationship
of slave and master.”
Mr Dichter said the police decision had disappointed him. “I
would have preferred to see this march stopped by the opposition of
an aware public rather than by the police.”
He said the large turnout of Jewish groups had been possible because
of a framework of co-operation between Jews and Arabs created in the
wake of the 13 deaths in Oct 2000.
That included a forum jointly headed by the Arab mayor of Umm al Fahm,
Sheikh Hashem Abd al Rahman, and the Jewish mayor of the Menashe Regional
Council, Ilan Sadeh. Mr Sadeh, who had assisted in plans to oppose
the Front, described the march as an attempt “to sow chaos in
the area”.
Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in
Nazareth, Israel. His latest books are “Disappearing Palestine:
Israel's Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His website
is www.jkcook.net.
This article originally appeared in The National (www.thenational.ae),
published in Abu Dhabi.
