Strangle
The Funding of Fanaticism
By Ra Ravishankar
The Campaign to Stop Funding
Hate has ruffled quite a few feathers, and understandably so. Since
IDRF's links with the Sangh Parivar have been laid bare, they don't
bear repetition. Given this, there still arises the question - Why only
pick on Hindu fanaticism? I will try answer this in what follows.
Religious fanaticism has
come to be identified with Islam, courtesy bin Laden. In the aftermath
of the WTC attacks, the U.S President issued an executive order on terrorist
financing, "blocking property and prohibiting transactions with
persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism",
and designated 27 individuals and organizations - all of them Muslim
- as engaged in terrorism. Incidentally, this included Harkat ul-Mujahideen
(HuM), a terrorist organization operating from Pakistan Occupied Kashmir.
In late October, HuM, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lakshar-e-Toiba (LeT)
were designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs). Shortly after
its suicide attack on the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative assembly, JeM's
assets were frozen by the U.S State Department. LeT met with the same
fate after the Indian Government accused it, along with JeM, of involvement
in the suicide attack on the Indian Parliament. Also caught unawares
in the dragnet was Ummah Tameer-e-Nau (UTN), which, besides being a
charity engaged in relief work in Afghanistan, is also an Al Qaeda collaborator
and a suspect in eight attacks in Kashmir in August which killed about
100 people. Terrorism under the garb of charity seems to be the norm,
and this also applies to JeM and LeT.
As things stand now, the
principal (in the Indian context) Islamic terrorist groups have been
outlawed, and their assets frozen, in the U.S, U.K and India. What about
their Hindu brethren who have been indicted by one and all, most recently
by the Citizens Tribunal? The Indian Government can't, for obvious reasons,
be expected to act against the Saffron Warriors. This being the case,
someone else had to shoulder the responsibility of exposing their nefarious
activities, which is what The Campaign to Stop Funding Hate did. Their
report, Foreign Exchange of Hate , is an irrefutable expose of IDRF,
a charity very much on the lines of UTN.
This is not all, however.
While a majority of Hindutva organizations in the U.S masquerade as
charities, they are not all that averse to revealing their virulent
self. One of the most recent such instances was Sadhvi Rithambara's
recent visit to the U.S. Infamous for her role in the demolition of
the Babri Masjid, where a very cunning juxtaposition of encouragement
(in the form of incendiary slogans like 'Ek dhakka aur dho, Babri Masjid
thod dho [Give one more push, break down Babri Masjid]') and castigation
(of the less forthcoming Swayamsevaks for their impotence) did the trick,
she was at her venomous worst in New York. While ostensibly fundraising
for shelters for orphans and widows, she justified the RamJanmaBhoomi
movement on the pretext that "if the youth of India stood up for
the cause, even Muslims will start to say Long Live Lord Ram [Yahan
to meeyan log bhi bolenge, Jai Shree Ram]." The 300 odd people
who had made it to the event had coughed out between $50 to $1,000 each.
In her five week tour of the U.S and U.K, the fortune she amassed is
anybody's guess! Rithambara's fundraising activities are apparently
beyond the purview of the executive order on terrorist financing! Furthermore,
in a cruel twist of irony, while she claims, in spite of having (mis)used
a religious platform (Ganesh temple in New York) to spit venom against
other religions, to be the upholder of Hinduism, those protesting her
visit were branded anti-Hindu! Doesn't really paint a rosy picture of
Hinduism to the uninitiated, does it?
If after having been outlawed
by both the U.S and Indian governments, Islamic fanaticism continues
to pose as much a threat as it does, doesn't Hindu fanaticism, operating
under the patronage/indifference of these governments, pose a much bigger
threat? Since the Indian Government only seems to be concerned with
the happenings in Kashmir, isn't it even more imperative for us to do
our mite to restore normalcy in Gujarat and ensure there'll be no more
Gujarats? Lets start off by strangling the funding for fanaticism, be
it for Hindutva as in the U.S and UK, or for Jihad as in say, Saudi
Arabia. While continuing to pressurize the Governments to act, lets
also petition the individual donors.
(The author is a graduate
student at the University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign)