The
Marad massacre
By V.R. Krishna Iyer
The Hindu
31 May, 2003
The Marad beach, a fisherfolk's
colony a few miles off Calicut, has lovely sands and salubrious breeze,
the Arabian Sea making the ambience of the place so soothing that people
are tempted at sunset to sit and gossip until yawning hours of night.
Two communities, Hindus and Muslims, live in proximity and seeming amity
and their hefty oarsmen's occupation is coastal fishing. There is a
temple near by and so too a mosque. Speaking generally, no overt communal
rivalry marred the peace of the locality nor was there provocative pugnacity
between the Arayas (Hindu fishing community) and their Muslim counterpart.
But there did break out in
January 2002 a sudden breach of the peace which had no communal tension
on the surface; but five persons died three Muslims and two Hindus
and it was a Hindu-Muslim scrimmage too violently planned to
be dismissed as a spontaneous eruption. The methodology suggested the
presence of outside elements in the perpetration of the crime. There
was a terrible outcry about this communal carnage. Many, including me,
visited the scene and measures to mollify, grant relief and restore
peaceful coexistence were undertaken. Apparent calm came to prevail
although only a small police outpost and some relief measures in separate
centres made symbolic State presence. The indolent investigation where
a clash and carnage with grave portents gored the locality did not result
in a charge sheet till May next year.
For well over a year, the
fishermen's boats were busy occupationally and the people of Kerala
slumbered assuming that life was normal. Terrorism dies hard and eternal
vigilance is the desideratum of communal pacifism. The embers burn beneath,
the surface quietude deceives. When external forces have access, ad
hoc exercises are self-delusive. Deeper probes, more fundamental therapies,
more perennial fraternisation alone can counter Hindu-Muslim alienation,
which may look local, but the groups hardly bury the hatchet.
It was Friday, May 2. A group
of simple Araya fishermen slipped and sat in the cushioned sand dunes,
enjoying idle conversation. The temple on the other side, at lamp-lighting
time, found a few devotees around and otherwise Nature was calm. And
then swooped on the innocents a savage brood of Islamic extremists with
sharp weapons like swords or long-curved knives with blood-thirsty blitz
to unloose murder most foul, most treacherous, most barbaric. From more
than one direction rushed this rabid rascal gang, with lethal arms and
killer plan, stabbed the defenceless Araya gossip group, a devotee returning
from the temple and a neighbouring petty tea shop dealer and spread
terror by throwing bombs which did not explode. Had they burst, the
number of the dead would have multiplied. Eight lost their lives and
many more were wounded. One Muslim from the attacking raiders was hit
by accident and died in the melee. The glorious Marad sunset scene,
in a few horrendous minutes, was drenched in blood and rent in cries
and tears, with the police arriving after the savage carnage was committed
and the terrorist felons had fled. Mobile phones were in action, the
murders were perfectly organised, the villains made good their escape
in vehicles waiting to operate the quick exit.
A large cache of swords and
knives were stored in the neighbouring masjid and the unholy heap of
dastardly weapons were later seized by the police. Beneath the heavy
sands was hidden a large sabre stock ready as a reserve for a mass massacre.
And the holy mosque betrayed an organised plot for a macro-scale gory
modus operandi. The armed aggressors were not necessarily local Islamic
hostiles retaliating the earlier year-old brutal battle referred
to as Marad I. Maybe that too was a malignant motivation.
Extraneous extremist infiltration
and preparation, if true, make Marad II a darkly dangerous portent,
not a mere coastal clash of Arayas and Mohallah fishing rivals. There
is deeper ideological militancy, graver fundamentalist extremism, terribly
more astute strategy and monetary investment; and Project Extermination
outwitted police intelligence, political information and people's suspicion.
Marad, with a little police outpost and no professional criminal intelligence
mechanism, reveals the disastrous flop and tragic inefficiency of the
State and society in the preservation of secularity and security.
Last week, in the company
of leading social activists, I visited this coastal suburb. As we entered
the tiny homesteads where the Hindu victims had lived, cries of the
bereaved moved us. What solace can you offer when the bread-winner of
the family is brutally stabbed dead while sitting in the sunny sands
relaxing and guilelessly gossiping? In helpless silence we listened
and each widow added a new dimension to the dastardly deaths. Then we
heard the Araya Samaj president and secretary who were tense and yet
sombrely sober as they demanded from us not sympathy but justice. Sympathy
is easy sentiment but justice is made of sterner stuff. Secular progressives
merely condemn, in general neutrality, communal chauvinism. Hindu communalists,
as majority communalists, are trenchantly stigmatised. But, the Araya
leaders challengingly urged us why Islamic communalists who shoot and
hate are not denounced harshly. They argued with agony that the mosque
was the sanctuary of Islamic terrorists. Then why should it not be taken
over by the District Magistrate for the sake of law and order? Was not
the Golden Temple, where Bhindranwale sought refuge, the subject of
Operation Blue Star? Was not Sivagiri, sacred shrine of Narayana Guru
glory, taken over by the District Magistrate?
True, mosques or other shrines
cannot be operational shelters of religious extremists for violent incitement
or surprise siege. These issues are of national relevance, especially
since sacerdotal bigotry, all religions included, has no territorial
barrier. Blandly describing communal disturbances as obnoxious is different
from zeroing in on communal terrorism which is diabolic treachery. Deadly
divisiveness is assuming apartheid dimensions. In Marad, the Araya Samaj
told us, with burning rage, that the Muslim gameplan is to drive out
the Arayas from the entire Malabar seacoast to monopolise sea fishing
for their community. This territorial terrorism is dangerous, if true,
because this would lead to massive battles all along the West Coast
and may spread to the East Coast.
The Marad massacre, as the
victim families reminded us, proves that minority Islamic communalism
is as militantly blood-thirsty as majority communalism, `red in tooth
and claw' as Hindutva extremism is a la Gujarat. The voice of
secularism cannot be soft towards either. State action in countering
communal explosion, tension and underground operation has been an exercise
in futility all over the country, with political "sound and fury
signifying nothing". There are Marads in every State with
a background of communal slaughter, and yet a mere police outpost! After
the event, khaki uniforms and guns everywhere! A new police road map
is an urgent desideratum. Location of fully equipped police stations
where simmering violence may burst aflame any moment, more technology
and mobility, more special training and intelligence wings, more vigilance
personnel and nocturnal rounds with focus sod attention on shrines,
festivals and secret hideouts, more scrutiny over religious classes
and drills these are `more honoured in the breach than the observance'.
True, Marad II produced a
better account of alert police operation. They rushed in numbers, searched
and seized from the sands and the Masjid huge quantities of arms and
incriminatory articles, took into custody many suspects and got on to
the trail of the culprits, although some of the key planners and cunning
perpetrators are still to be tracked down. The Crime Branch has done
a good job despite the political-communal imbroglio and the complete
discovery is yet distances away.
Divided Marad is divided
Bharat. Homogenise or perish! Therefore, the two communities in dynamic
comity, with distinct identity but neighbourhood fraternity, must come
together in moral and spiritual fellowship and material camaraderie.
A tearing and raging campaign to extirpate violent extremism and terrorist
godism is the only means of promoting civil society solidarity and preserving
pluralist democracy. Rehabilitation of refugees, regardless of religion,
by a process of communal symbiosis, is the beginning of a dynamic modus
vivendi. That is the message and mandate of Marad.