BJP Back On
Aggressive
Hindutva Track
By
Asghar Ali Engineer
10 September, 2004
Centre for Study of Society and
Secularism
The
BJP was so sure of its victory in the last Lok Sabha election that it
feigned to have given up its Hindutva card and even tried to appeal
('appease') to minorities for votes. In Bihar the then Prime Minister
Shri. Atal Bihari Vajpayee even promised in his speech at Kishenganj
that he will appoint 200,000 Urdu teachers, if elected to power. However,
the Indian electorate inflicted crushing defeat on the BJP-led NDA and
elected the UPA Government instead.
However, the Sangh
Parivar overconfident of BJP's victory could not accept the defeat in
true democratic spirit and is feeling highly frustrated. The NDA members,
particularly those of BJP are even refusing to behave as a responsible
opposition in the Parliament. They have been obstructing the procedure
and refusing to allow the parliament to function on one pretext or the
other. They raised the issue of 'tainted ministers' and stalled parliament
for days. They did not even allow debate on budget and it has to be
passed without any discussion. They thus made history of sorts. Thus
the NDA leaders are responsible for waste of public money and answerable
to the electorate. If they do not follow the norms of democratic behaviour
they do not deserve to be elected.
What is worse is
that they are now adopting quite aggressively their old Hindutva course
which, they had assured Indian people, they had abandoned. In 1980 also
they had assured people of India that they have adopted 'secularism
and Gandhian socialism' but abandoned it in favour of aggressive communalism
the moment they faced crushing defeat in Parliamentary elections of
1984 when they got only two seats.
Again facing defeat
in Lok Sabha elections of 2004 they have gone back to Hindutva politics
with vengeance. Thus communal forces can hardly be relied. While in
power and sure of their continued hold on it they feign to be secular
and adopt aggressive communalism the moment they loose power. They have
played the same game this time around. Now they are going back to aggressive
Hindutva in view of state elections in Maharashtra and in Bihar after
a few months.
One such issue is
of Veer Savarkar. Mani Shankar Aiyer ordered removal of poems of Veer
Savarkar from the cellular jail of Andaman. The BJP is raising hue and
cry over the issue. In Maharashtra of course they have left it to Shiv
Sena as Savarkar's issue is highly emotive in Maharashtra. Thus the
BJP who is part of alliance with Shiv Sena wants the Sena to provoke
electorate on this issue while it would take up another issues. This
itself shows that the BJP is not genuinely concerned with Savarkar issue
but wants to exploit it for election purposes through Shiv Sena.
Veer Savarkar's
grand niece Uttara Sahasrabuddhe who teaches political science in the
Bombay University, has alleged that both the Congress and BJP-Shiv Sena
are trying to turn Veer Savarkar into an election issue. According to
her this was hardly a good reason for the Sena and the BJP to boycott
Parliament when the budget was being passed, she maintained.
She also said that
if the Sangh Parivar was sincere in its protest against what the Congress
had done, it should ask the lieutenant governor of the Andamans to put
the plaque back. The lieutenant governor Mr. Ram Kapse, was a BJP appointee
and belongs to that party. She also said in her statement to The Asian
Age that Savarkar was a rationalist. He never thought cow was so sacred
and not be killed. He specifically wrote in one of the articles, she
noted that "the cow was a useful animal once upon a time when we
were dependent on agriculture. But don't make it a sacred animal. If
you believe that God resides in a cow it's foolish."
Savarkar also maintained,
according to her that if you want to differentiate between Western civilisation
and Indian civilisation, then you must know that after the Renaissance
movement the West took to rationalism as its basis and made tremendous
progress. We still stick to what is written in Vedas and Puranas, and
because of this tendency we are stuck in the past.
Of course she rightly
points out that "The Sangh Parivar cannot eschew or digest these
essays. The Sangh Parivar considers cow as sacred and VHP and Bajrang
Dal harass even those who take old oxen or buffaloes for slaughter.
One of the main agendas of the BJP is to ban cow slaughter throughout
India. The BJP even justified killing of Dalits in Haryana who were
skinning dead cows a few years ago?
Thus it is clear
that the BJP wants to exploit Veer Savarkar's issue for its own political
purposes while totally rejecting Savarkar's rational thoughts. It would
hardly convince anyone of its sincerity.
Another issue BJP
is preoccupied with is that of arrest of Uma Bharati, former Chief Minister
of M.P. In fact there are indications that the BJP wanted to get rid
of Uma Bharati as Chief Minister of M.P. and her arrest warrant came
as a relief to the BJP central leadership. She may be an aggressive
agitator but she was a failure as a chief minister and had created complex
problems for the Party.
However, now the
BJP is making her arrest as a national issue and flying tricolour is
being projected as a national mission. Of course tricolour is our national
flag and we are all proud of that but one cannot take pride by making
it as a anti-Muslim measure. Uma Bharati went to hoist tricolour on
an Idgah, which is a disputed site. The Sangh Parivar had planned to
convert the Hubli Idgah issue as a Babri Masjid of the South at that
time though the matter was resolved amicably by persuading the Hubli
Muslims to hoist the national flag on the Idgah.
Now the Sangh Parivar
is thinking of taking out her Yatra flying tricolour. It is an old trick,
which the Parivar plays repeatedly. In fact the RSS refuses to fly tricolour
in its own Shakhas and flies Bhagwa flag. Let Uma Bharati fly tricolour
on the RSS offices if she is so enthusiastic about flying tricolour.
Let her fly it on temples as well. She is trying to earn electoral advantage
in coming elections by raising these controversies. But now there is
news that the Government of Karnataka may petition the Court to withdraw
all cases against her thus depriving her the opportunity to be a martyr.
The Congress is trying to defeat her game. The BJP has never been comfortable
with secular issues or issues of development. It adopted Sadak-Bijli-Pani
issue in M.P. election as it was agitating the minds of electorate in
the state then. But as it was not sure whether this will click Uma Bharati
was repeatedly raising the issue of Saraswati temple and Kamal Maula
Masjid in Dhar, M.P. The other members of Sangh Parivar were playing
up this issue to entice the voters for Sangh Parivar.
And now since the
BJP is not in power at the Centre it has no compulsions or restraints
of being in power and can try to go whole hog with Hindutva politics.
BJP can never be secularised as long as it is tied firmly to the communal
apron of the RSS. The RSS keeps on pressurising it to adopt aggressive
Hindutva. And the BJP has to repeatedly assure the RSS that it will
never offload the ideology of Hindutva without which it cannot get help
of dedicated RSS cadre in the elections.
When the Jan Sangh
had merged with the Janata Party and had taken pledge for secularism
at the Gandhi Samadhi under the leadership of Jai Prakash Narain in
1977, it had refused to resign from the RSS membership though the dual
membership controversy (both membership of the Janta Party and the RSS)
had brought down the Morarji Desai Government in 1979. Thus it will
be seen that it is firmly tied to the apron strings of RSS and its strident
anti-minorities stance will never be diluted. Those so called NDA secular
partners are deceiving themselves or fooling the people, if they pretend
that the BJP will ever give up its Hindutva plank.
Also, in view of
the upcoming elections in Maharashtra in October the Shiv Sena-BJP are
trying to stir communal passions. The bombs thrown by unknown motor
cycle riders at the mosques during Friday prayers in Prabhani and Jalna
is an obvious attempt in that direction. The winning of election in
Maharashtra by the Sangh Parivar is of great significance. It thinks
it is an opportunity to shake the UPA Government at the Centre. Defeat
of the Congress NCP alliance in Maharashtra can have long term consequences.
If the BJP-Shiv Sena combination can win in Maharashtra they can try
to win over Sharad Pawar and persuade him to join NDA. Sharad Pawar
is known to have soft corner for the BJP-Shiv Sena alliance. Also, the
Mumbai Municipal Corporation under Shiv Sena has passed a resolution
making singing Vande Mataram compulsory in municipal schools. They remember
Vande Mataram at the time of elections only.
The Sena is also
very eager to come back to power and will go to any extent in playing
up Hindutva card. It is very unfortunate that the Election Commission
is satisfied with these parties signing pledge of secularism although
their propaganda machinery aggressively works to propagate communal
issues during the elections. What a contradiction. How can a party taking
pledge for secularism as required by the election commission openly
and aggressively propagate Hindutva? Can they not be disqualified on
grounds of breaking their secular pledge? Is it not against the Constitution
to propagate Hindutva during the election campaign? It is for the authorities
to decide.
It seems secularism
is becoming a distant dream in view of increasing communalisation of
our politics. Forget about Nehruvian secularism even Gandhian concept
of religious harmony is becoming a dream rather than reality. Every
religious group, every religious community, wants to bring in sectarian
issues in political arena. Those who strive for inter-religious harmony
will have to face increasing challenges in coming days. And yet inter-religious
harmony is so vital for our multi-religious society.