Decoding
Modi's Victory
And Secular Politics
By
Manish Chand
31 December,
2007
Indiaenews.com
Narendra
Modi's repeat landslide victory in Gujarat against the spectacular odds
stacked against him - anti-incumbency, the odious hangover of the 2002
riots, an unforgiving Muslim minority, BJP spoilers and a hostile media
- has exposed the fragility and speciousness of secular politics practised
in the country by those who are quick to seize on the secularism mantra
as the sole rallying point.
One of the
first reactions from the Left parties after it became clear that Modi
has won the Gujarat sweepstakes defying all punters and pundits was
that the victory should encourage secular forces to come together to
face a resurgent 'communal threat'. In other words, Modi may have won
Gujarat, but in the process he may have unintentionally created a bigger
headache for the BJP by forcing the so-called secular parties into a
closer embrace than before. Other reactions were on more predictable
lines: Congress party spokesperson Veerappa Moily tried to put a brave
face on his party's abject defeat, saying success doesn't make a man
virtuous.
In other words, no matter how many elections Modi wins, it does not
wash away his sins in being an alleged abettor or silent onlooker to
the communal holocaust that engulfed Gujarat over five years ago, leaving
a sharply polarised polity behind. Modi, basking in this historic win
seen by pundits as a sort of watershed in Indian politics, can now retort
with glee: 'If I am maut ka suadgar (merchant of death, as Congress
chief Sonia Gandhi tried to project him), then so are all those people
who voted for me.' And when he says that, regardless of what you and
I think, a majority of Gujaratis are likely to applaud in unison.
True, no
electoral victory can extenuate the enormity of what happened in Gujarat
in 2002, allegedly with active connivance of or a silent nod from the
powers-that-be in Gandhinagar. In all fairness, Gujarat, the land of
Gandhi, Patel and Dhirubhai Patel which is now being remoulded as the
laboratory of Hindutva, may have moved on, but Modi could have shown
at least some sign of remorse or said sorry. But in his strong man image
- tough, incorruptible and not easily swayed by compromise - he has
done none of these.
Despite all
this, the Congress has clearly not been able to tap into the pervasive
mood of resentment and outrage among Muslims, whether in Gujarat or
in the last elections in Uttar Pradesh, because it sounded apologetic
about making riots a central issue in elections, thinking it may play
into Modi's hands. Communist leader Sitaram Yechuri pointed this out
when he said after Modi's victory that the Congress campaign against
communalism was not 'concerted enough'. Other Left leaders said the
Congress did not have the stomach to go the whole hog on the issue of
communalism as was evident from the flip-flop on Sonia Gandhi's 'maut
ka sudagar' remark after Modi justified the encounter death of Sohrabuddin
Sheikh.
And for all
its tall claims about speaking for 'aam admi' (the common man) against
chartered members of Shining India, the Congress was spectacularly tardy
and inept in forging a coalition of Muslims and backward castes that
could have derailed the Modi juggernaut.
The real
point about Gujarat verdict 2007 is that it has discredited the politically
inconvenient brand of secular politics, as practised by its current
votaries who feed on Muslim anxieties of being swamped by an assertive,
intolerant majority and regard Muslims as a vote bank to be milked at
will. In 1992, the then Congress government led by P.V. Narasimha Rao
is said to have played a game of duplicity in the days leading to the
demolition of the Babri Masjid, putting one foot in the Hindutva camp
and the other in assuaging the minorities. Rao is said to have been
sleeping when the news of the demolition of the mosque broke.
Many political
observers have pointed out that the so-called secular leaders have been
cynically using secularism as a slogan without showing any real courage
in standing up for what they seek to espouse. In their pronouncements
on secularism, which essentially amount to branding their chief opponents
as communal monsters in a kind of contrived demonology, one can barely
see any conviction. Moreover, such a posture reeks of an opportunistic
move to perpetuate the Hindu-Muslim divide for purely electoral reasons.
At this point,
one may ask what are the lessons of the Gujarat elections for national
elections that could be held within the next one and a half years. Although
the dynamics of state and national politics differ sharply, there is
one enduring message in Modi's victory: it's time for all mainstream
political parties to move beyond sloganeering centred around secularism
to real all too real issues of development and national identity.
It may sound
simplistic, but it's time to demystify punditry and unscramble many
an alphabet puzzle - BIMARU, KHAM etcetera - that clutter political
discourse and return to the plain sense of things. The point is no matter
how high-sounding manifestoes and pamphlets of political parties are
and how admirable it is to place the institution above personalities,
leadership matters. And leadership means decisiveness, calculation,
sincerity and conviction and embodying in words and deeds the idea of
India a leader stands for. The idea of India a leader espouses may be
a contentious one, but he must believe in it wholly and completely and
not regard it as a matter of compromise. Not that Modi embodies all
of these ideals; far from it - but his victory proved that despite what
cynics say millions of Gujaratis saw him as embodying 'Gujarati asmita'
and 'vibrant Gujarat.'
In other
words, the next ruling dispensation should not be forged on the basis
of the fear of Modi - read real or imagined of threats to secularism
- but on seeing Modi as just one of the competing ideas in national
discourse and making real the promise of India for its one-billion-plus
citizens.
Manish
Chand is an assistant editor in IANS. The views expressed are
personal. He can be contacted at [email protected]
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.