US
Raid On Baghdad’s Sadr City Leaves Many Dead And Wounded
By Bill Van Auken
22 October, 2007
WSWS.org
A
violent US assault on Baghdad’s Sadr City Sunday left many people
dead—49 according to the military’s own count—and
scores more wounded. The foray into the crowded and impoverished Shia
neighborhood, home to an estimated 3 million people, was launched before
dawn and quickly escalated as American forces called in air strikes
that left houses, stores and cars destroyed and in flames.
US military spokesmen described
the dead as “criminals.” Major Winfield Danielson told the
media: “I can say that we don’t have any evidence of any
civilians killed or wounded. Coalition forces only engage hostile threats
and make every effort to protect innocent civilians.”
The evidence, however, was
impossible to ignore. Television footage from the scene showed the bloodied
bodies of two slain toddlers, one in diapers, at the local morgue. The
Reuters news agency reported: “In a house where one of the children
lived, a man pointed to bloodstained mattresses and blood-splattered
pillows, choking back tears as he held up a photo of one of the dead.”
The local Imam Ali hospital
was overwhelmed with casualties, including children, women and the elderly.
The bodies of those slain were placed in coffins covered with the Iraqi
flag. Angry crowds marched through the streets of Sadr City carrying
the coffins.
Iraqi government spokesman
Ali al-Dabbagh charged that all those killed in the raid were civilians
and said that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki had met with US commander
General David Petraeus to protest the killings.
No American casualties were
reported in the action.
According to spokesmen for
the US occupation forces, the raid had been launched in a bid to capture
a so-called high-value target. The military issued a statement saying
that “The operation’s objective was an individual reported
to be a long-time Special Groups member specializing in kidnapping operations.”
“Special Groups”
is a category invented by the US military authorities, meant to describe
those in the Shia areas who are perceived as an opposing the American
occupation. The Pentagon has used this jargon to portray the resistance
as the work of “rogue” elements directed, trained and armed
by Iran.
An Iraqi police source, however,
was quoted by the Al Jazeera news agency as saying that the raid was
launched, apparently in retaliation, after a US vehicle was struck by
a roadside bomb.
The accounts that have emerged
thus far suggest that the attempts by US troops to move into the neighborhood
in the pre-dawn hours provoked unanticipated resistance, including small
arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades. The ground forces responded
by calling in air strikes by US jet fighters and helicopter gunships.
It appears that many of those
killed died in their sleep, either killed on their roofs where Baghdad
residents frequently go to escape the heat, or from shells and missiles
that smashed into their homes.
According to the Associated
Press: “A local resident who goes by the name Abu Fatmah said
his neighbor’s 14-year-old son, Saif Alwan, was killed while sleeping
on the roof.
“‘Saif was killed
by an air strike and what is his guilt? Is he from the Mahdi Army? He
is a poor student,’ Abu Fatmah said.
“An uncle of 2-year-old
Ali Hamid said the boy was killed and his parents seriously wounded
when helicopter gunfire pierced the wall and windows of their house
as they slept indoors.”
The carnage in Sadr City
erupted in the context of intensified US attacks throughout Iraq. Just
a day earlier, US troops raided neighborhoods in the southern city of
Diwaniyah, supposedly in search of leaders of the Mahdi Army, the militia
loyal to Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. US attack helicopters were called
in and fired on the area, destroying at least five homes. The US military
reported detaining 30 people in the raid, while again claiming that
the bombardment caused no civilian casualties.
On October 11, US air strikes
against a home in Samarra killed 34 people, including nine children,
one of the deadliest such attacks to be acknowledged by the US military
since the 2003 invasion.
There is growing evidence
that the use of air strikes against the Iraqi people has grown considerably
since the military “surge” ordered by the Bush administration
at the beginning of the year, even as it goes largely unreported by
the US media.
The US Air Force posts daily
accounts of its operations, listing between 50 and 70 “close-air-support
missions” each day. According to a survey by the Associated Press,
the number of bombs dropped by US war planes on Iraq increased fivefold
during the first six months of 2007, compared to the same period a year
earlier. The Air Force has for the first time this year deployed powerful
B1-B bombers in Iraq, capable of carrying up to 24 tons of bombs.
This increasing use of air
power inevitably entails a growing toll in terms of civilian dead and
wounded, referred to by military officials a “collateral damage.”
The study of excess Iraqi deaths published in the authoritative British
medical journal Lancet a year ago estimated that 13 percent of all violent
deaths in Iraq were caused by US air strikes. The report’s authors
estimated that these strikes were responsible for fully 50 percent of
the violent deaths of children under the age of 15.
The increasing use of such
air power—and the indiscriminate bloodshed that it entails—is
a measure of the growing crisis of the American occupation and the Pentagon’s
fears about the demoralization and disintegration of US ground forces
in Iraq. The deliberate aerial bombardment of crowded civilian neighborhoods—a
war crime—is designed both to further terrorize the Iraqi population
and cut the number of US casualties.
On Saturday, US troops also
raided and ransacked the headquarters of the Iraqi Islamic Party (IIP)
in Baghdad, leaving it in a shambles. The IIP, which is the largest
Sunni party in Iraq, is led by Iraq’s Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi.
Al-Hashemi has provoked the
ire of both Iraqi Prime Minister al-Maliki, and the US occupation authorities
in recent weeks with his highly publicized visits to crowded detention
camps, where predominantly Sunni prisoners have told him that they are
innocent, have been arrested without charges and have been subjected
to torture.
The United Nations humanitarian
mission in Iraq recently released a report estimating that there were
some 44,000 detainees in Iraqi or US custody as of last June—a
total that had increased by at least 10 percent just over the previous
two months as a result of increased US raids. No doubt this prison population
has grown sharply since then.
The UN report cited “widespread
and routine torture and ill-treatment of detainees.”
“In addition to routine
beatings with hosepipes, cables and other implements,” the report
states, “the methods cited included prolonged suspension from
the limbs in contorted and painful positions for extended periods, sometimes
resulting in dislocation of the joints, electric shocks to sensitive
parts of the body; the breaking of limbs; forcing detainees to sit on
sharp objects, causing serious injury and heightening the risk of infection;
and severe burns to parts of the body through the application of heated
implements.”
Meanwhile, one of Washington’s
principal Iraqi collaborators and an architect of the US-imposed regime
declared in a television interview that the American intervention has
brought only “chaos and instability.”
Feisal Amin Istrabadi, who
resigned in August as Iraq’s deputy ambassador to the United Nations,
told NBC News Friday that “there is no Iraqi government,”
only an “appearance of institutions.”
Istrabadi, a US-born lawyer
who was a leading figure among the exile circles promoting a US invasion
and later played the key role in drafting Iraq’s interim constitution,
blamed the catastrophe confronting Iraq on Washington’s drive
to hold early elections in which the population was pushed to support
competing ethno-religious-based parties.
“What did we accomplish,
exactly [with] this push towards an appearance of institutions ... merely
an appearance?” he asked. “Except that an American politician
can stand up and say, ‘Look what we accomplished in Iraq.’
When in fact, what we accomplished in Iraq over the last three years
has been chaos and instability.”
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.