America's Nazi Allies in Israel And Ukraine
By Eric Zuesse
24 July, 2014
The U.S. is now the chief sponsor of two nazi, ethnically cleansing, nations. In one of them (Ukraine), the U.S. President, Barack Obama, himself placed nazis into control there; the nazi control was imposed by him, via his agents . In the other (Israel), nazis have controlled for decades, and Obama merely extends their control by continuing American support.
The difference between nazism and mere fascism is that, as exemplified by Mussolini, fascism is pure "corporationism" (see page 426 there), not necessarily racist; whereas nazism, as exemplified by Hitler, is a profoundly and ineradicably racist, usually religious-based, form of fascism. It's “corporationism” plus ethnic bigotry. Hitler's version of nazism happened to be focused against Jews, but that's not necessary to nazism; any racist fascism is nazi. (NOTE: a lower-case "nazi" is any nazi, but an upper-case one, a "Nazi," refers to a member of Hitler's Party , which was Germany's nazi party, the first-ever nazi party, the original "Nazi Party." Similarly, Mussolini's party was the Italian "Fascist" party, the first fascist party, but other nations have their own fascist and/or nazi parties.)
People of any ethnic group can be nazis, and Jews are no different from other ethnicities in that regard. For example, on July 21st, Jonathan Cook headlined from Nazareth, "Calls for genocide enter Israeli mainstream," and he documented his headline-claim by quoting Jewish nazis around Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
First, Cook quoted Ayelet Shaked. From 2006 to 2008, she had been the Office Manager for Prime Minister Netanyahu. In January 2012, Netanyahu's Likud Party appointed her to be their "Coordinator." A half-year later, in June, she co-founded her own right-wing Party, "My Israel." In 2013, Israelis elected her to the Knesset, their parliament, as a Jewish Home Party leader.
On 1 July 2014, she posted to facebook an article by Uri Elitzur, who "was also close to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, helping him in his 1996 campaign, and took a leave of absence from his journalistic activities to work in the Prime Minister's Office, which he headed in 1998-99." So: Elitzur had been Shaked's mentor. She introduced his article by saying that it was "Relevant today as it was then." Here are excerpts from it, in the Bing translation at her facebook page :
"The Palestinian people has declared war on us, and we need to fight back. ... Who is the enemy? The Palestinian people. Why? You ask him, he started [the war]. ... All the Palestinian people is the enemy. All war is between two peoples. ... All the enemy fighters and bleeding in the head. It's also the mothers of the martyrs, that send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They need to follow them [to die], there's nothing in it. They need to go [die], and the physical House [in] which they raised the snake [must be destroyed]. Other small snakes grow more [if that house stands]. ... Each bomber should have known he was taking with him both his parents and his home and neighbors. All UM Jihad hero that sends her son to hell needs to know that she's going with him. Along with the House and all that."
In short: she was (and he was) saying to exterminate the Palestinian "people," and to destroy "the House and all that." Extermination-intent is clear. Shaked and Elitzur clearly are Jewish nazis, and not merely Jewish fascists. What Hitler was to Jews, Elitzur and Shaked are to Palestinians. Their “war” is against an entire “people,” and victory means exterminating it, killing “the snake,” so that there will be no “small snakes.”
Mr. Cook then quotes a scholar in Israel, who was not censured by his university for saying: "A terrorist, like those who kidnapped the boys [in the West Bank on June 12] and killed them, the only thing that will deter them, is if they know that either their sister or mother will be raped if they are caught. What can we do? This is the culture that we live in [surrounded by Muslims]." That person, Mordechai Kedar, a lecturer on Arabic literature at Bar Ilan University, is also a nazi. Hitler, too, blamed his racism on the ethnicity that he hated, and he cited the Bible as justifying it (both the Old and New Testaments, both of which are racist; and he knew the Bible well, and cited more than a hundred of its passages, as I documented in my WHY the Holocaust Happened ).
Finally, Cook quotes Moshe Feiglin, a deputy speaker of the Israeli parliament and a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud: "The IDF [Israeli Defense Force] will conquer the entire Gaza, using all the means necessary to minimize any harm to our soldiers, with no other considerations. … The enemy population that is innocent of wrong-doing and separated itself from the armed terrorists will be treated in accordance with international law and will be allowed to leave. Israel will generously aid those who wish to leave." Similarly, Hitler had long entertained proposals to expel some Jews instead of to exterminate them all. However, because of his hatred of Jews, he ultimately rejected all such proposals, and just killed them. He called them "snakes," and even "the international snake": Hitler was as collectivist a thinker about Jews, as Israel's nazis are about Palestinians.
Albert Einstein called zionists themselves, "fascists," but what really galled him about zionists was their racism; he simply didn't distinguish between mere "fascists" and full-fledged "nazis." Jews in Palestine/Israel at that time went far beyond their rights in the way that they treated local Arabs. The day after the Deir Yassin massacre -- the massacre of the Arab town of Deir Yassin on 9 April 1948 by Yitzhak Shamir's Stern Gang and Menachem Begin's Irgun organization -- Einstein sent a letter to the American Friends of the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel, declining their offer to meet with him, by saying: “When a real and final catastrophe should befall us in Palestine the first responsible for it would be the British and the second responsible for it the Terrorist organizations build [sic: built] up from our own ranks [referring here to Stern and Irgun]. I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people.” Later, on December 4th of the same year, The New York Times published a letter dated two days earlier and signed by Einstein and other Jewish intellectuals, saying: “The terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin.” This letter explicitly called Menachem Begin a Jewish “Fascist,” and regretted “that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel.” ( The New York Times excluded that letter from its online archives, and so independent opponents of censorship posted it as “To The Editors of The New York Times” “December 2, 1948”.) Einstein would have been shocked that Israelis subsequently elected Mr. Begin Prime Minister. He would be revolted by current America's fascism represented now no longer merely by the Republican Party but also by a "Democratic" U.S. President, who continues the $3 billion annual military aid to that "fascist" regime, even after the Jonathan Pollard case. Einstein was anti-zionist till the end of his days, and never respected Israel. Alfred Lilienthal's 1953 What Price Israel? quotes Einstein (p. 130) as having said in 1946 “I have always been against it.” The United States, which has none of the guilt for the Holocaust, especially has no moral obligation to Israel, and merely besmirches America by funding it, a vile thing this country does. The very idea of a "Jewish State," like that of a "Christian State," or of an "Islamic State," is racist-fascist, or nazi, and was repulsive to Einstein, who considered them all, "fascist." That characterization was correct, but they're also nazi, which is even worse.
After Christian anti-Semitism nearly exterminated all Jews in World War II, Britain and other Christian-majority nations shoved surviving European Jews off onto a majority-Muslim area, "Palestine," and racist Jews were eager to take the offer, though decent Jews took it only because majority-Christian nations, which had actually perpetrated and cooperated with the Holocaust, wouldn't accept more Jews. Those decent Jews, tragically, had no choice.
There is no real "Jewish State." There is only a nazi police-state that claims to be "the Jewish Home." It invites decent Jews there in order to add to the population and so help more to crush the non-Jewish natives. But it's Jewish nazism, or "zionism." The very basis of nazism is the idea of an ethnic state: a caste system, in which some people, by their birth or ethnicity, possess more rights than do other people. Nazism is the exact opposite of the progressive state, the latter being the state where equality of opportunity is the law, and where inequality of opportunity is despised instead of embodied in the Law . Any form of privilege versus non-privilege, caste system, is abhorent to all decent people; and nazism epitomizes evil everywhere -- Israel just as much as Germany. Only a racist would say that Jews (or any other ethnic group) are somehow exempt from the universal ethical rule.
Robert Barsocchini headlined on 12 July 20124, “Facts All US Citizens Need to Know About Israel and Palestine,” and he accurately summarized the foul history of this "Israel." The United States was founded by committed democrats, and with a real Constitution (which Israel doesn't even have, because a constitution would conflict with the Torah; democracy is impossible in Israel for the same reason it's impossible in Iran or Saudi Arabia: it runs up against “God's Law”). (The Iranian and Saudi Constitutions impose the Quran as the Supreme Law, and so are merely fake pass-through “constitutions,” actual dictatorships. Israel's “constitution” -- if any -- is the Torah; Iran's and Saudi Arabia's is the Quran. Such states are theocracies, fake “democracies.”) A democracy shouldn't be allied with a theocracy in any way, especially militarily, because it then puts us on the side of nazis against their victims. A democracy doesn't want to be at war against theocracies, but certainly cannot be allied with any. Trade with a theocracy is acceptable, but alliance with it is certainly not. The original sin of the majority-Christian countries regarding Israel is their having caused the problem and then dumped the consequences of it onto the poor people who lived in the area that today is called "Israel." Any decent Jew wants to leave from there, and any decent majority-Christian country is obliged to welcome those decent "Israelis" in, as refugees from nazism, and to apologize wholeheartedly to them for having participated in causing that gross injustice, "Israel," via Christian anti-Semitism, for which today's Palestinians are bearing the final tragic burden, in the form of Israel's pass-through to those unfortunates of Germany's original Nazism against Jews.
Since I have previously written extensively about U.S. President Obama's installation of the nazi regime in Ukraine via his coup there in February, and his sponsorship of the regime's ethnic cleansing program to get rid of the ethnic-Russian voters for the man whom Obama had overthrown there, that won't be repeated. However, it needs to be noted in the present context, simply to indicate that Obama doesn't merely support Israel's nazism, but that he has even installed Ukraine's -- and no previous U.S. President ever installed nazism, anywhere, before. Obama is thus the first full-fledged nazi U.S. President. He desecrates the Party of the anti-fascist and passionately anti -nazi, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Obama has made himself a profound stain upon his nominal Party -- a stain that only that Party can remove.
Consequently, the U.S. is the world's leading state sponsor of nazism in our time. The aristocratically controlled U.S. "news" media don't report this ugly fact (America's fascist and even nazi leadership) to the American public, but it's true nonetheless. Readers here are thus encountering here American “samizdat.” It's banned truth, but of the U.S. variety, instead of the U.S.S.R. variety. There's no difference: Like in the Soviet Union, Hitler's Germany, and other dictatorships, our “news media” are actually propaganda-media.
One might have thought that FDR had won his battle against nazism and fascism, but those ideologies -- even nazism -- unfortunately survived (due to the constant propaganda from our aristocracy) and have thrived in the U.S. to such an extent that, in a sense, what FDR fought for, which is progressive democracy, has since been destroyed, right here inside the United States itself. It has been destroyed not only by the Republican Party (which at least after Nixon has had an actual fondness for fascism, and even for nazism), but also by the recent "Democratic" Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, rotting the Democratic Party from its very topmost, best-funded pro-aristocratic level, the Party's financial pinnacle, even if not yet from its middle and lower levels, which still remain rather progressive populist, though that too will soon be gone if no Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives soon brings forth a resolution to impeach Obama, as he must be impeached, if America (and especially the Democratic Party itself) is to retain any honor, and if democracy is not totally to die here. Republicans could not disown George W. Bush because he really was a Republican. If Democrats do not disown Barack Obama, then Democrats display themselves as being equally despicable and unpatriotic, and now is our only remaining chance to separate ourselves from Republicans in a way that's more than merely rhetorical, more than merely “lesser-of-two-evils” fake “liberalism” (or whatever else Democrats might then emptily claim to be).
President Obama is not only the very first U.S. President to install an outright nazi government anywhere, but he is going so far as to try to strong-arm European leaders to accept it (his Ukrainian nazi regime) into the EU. In a sense, therefore, he is even out-doing George W. Bush and his murderous, vile, and totally unwarranted, invasion of Iraq, for which Bush should be in prison, if this nation has any honor, or any real hope.
Without accountability, there can only be dictatorship. America must now choose whether to restore its democracy, for we have certainly lost it. Today's America would have this nation's great Founders twisting in their graves. We can do better. We must -- if we are Americans, as they (our Founders) did all they could, hoping that we would be. It can be done , and it should be done . And the available time-window to do it is fast closing. And only we can do it. (Republicans, in their own self-interest, refuse to do it .)
[NOTE: This news report and analysis were offered as an exclusive to the following, none of which accepted it for publication, nor responded in any way: The Daily Beast, Salon, Slate, Huffington Post, Mother Jones, Progressive, The Nation, Harper's, The Atlantic, New Yorker, New York Review of Books, Foreign Policy, The New Republic, TIME, McClatchy, Guardian , Bloomberg, AP. It was then submitted in the regular way to all news-outlets.]
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010 , and of CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity .
Comments are moderated