A
Black Day For Pakistan's Press
By Omar Waraich
13 June, 2007
Counterpunch
Over
the past week, Pakistan's independent media outlets have suffered a
wide-ranging clampdown. Several channels, including Geo TV, ARY digital
and Aaj were taken off the air. A decree--now suspended pending further
review--was issued that empowers Pemra, Pakistan's electronic media
regulatory authority under the control of the government's infamous
Ministry of Information, to limit live news broadcasts, seize equipment,
seal offices and studios, and terminate broadcast licenses. In response,
hundreds of Pakistani journalists took to the streets to demonstrate
and observed June 7 as a "black day" for the country's media.
"We've been among the
worst hit," says Talat Hussain, head of current affairs at cable
channel Aaj TV. "Most of our transmission throughout the country
has been scaled down. The government was not happy with the way we have
been covering some of the current issues. Pemra was ordered to 'regulate
us', which is another way of saying, 'put the curbs on us'. There is
now a battle between the Musharraf government and the broadcast media."
The new measures appear to be a reaction to Islamabad's current woes.
Since early March, triggered by Musharraf's decision to suspend the
chief justice of the Supreme Court, a burgeoning pro-democracy movement
led by lawyers has been asserting its presence throughout the country
with strikes, rallies and demonstrations. The private media's coverage
of these events has excited sharp criticism from senior government officials,
some of whom have accused journalists of encouraging the protests.
The Musharraf government
prides itself on being a guarantor of press independence. "Today
in Pakistan, there is unprecedented press freedom," insists Tariq
Azim, the minister for information and broadcasting. "They can
say what they like, report what they like. Except that we expect them
to have a self-censorship--their own code of ethics and conduct."
Whereas previous governments--both
military and civilian--ruthlessly suppressed dissent, the past eight
years of military dictatorship have seen an explosion of media outlets.
There are now 43 independently owned cable channels available, including
MTV Pakistan, Nickelodeon and CNBC Pakistan. Political talk shows feature
a diversity of views that would please Ofcom. And social mores have
relaxed to the point where fashion shows and a transvestite talk show
host, Begum Nawazish Ali, are proving more popular than the new breed
of Muslim televangelists.
But this freedom, critics
argue, is finely circumscribed. "When it has come under pressure,
the Musharraf government has reverted to type and shown its dictatorial
tendencies," says Ali Dayan Hasan, a senior researcher at Human
Rights Watch.
On March 16, a large demonstration
was taking place outside the Supreme Court in Islamabad. Violence erupted
after the police were unable to contain the angry crowds and resorted
to the use of batons, rubber bullets and tear gas. All of this was being
captured and broadcast on Geo TV. In the midst of this live coverage,
members of the Punjab police reportedly stormed the channel's offices,
interrupted the broadcast, smashed equipment, hurled canisters of tear
gas and beat members of staff. An office of the News, an English-language
newspaper was also attacked, while Aaj TV's transmission was briefly
interrupted. Musharraf swiftly apologized for the police actions, and
appeared on the channel the next night to reassure viewers. He also
gave an interview to Aaj TV after their offices in Karachi were fired
on by gunmen on May 12, when the chief justice was visiting the city
for a rally.
"The city was practically
under siege," recalls Hussain. "Right next to our building,
the MQM--the ruling party in Karachi--and another opposition party were
exchanging fire. When we started to cover the firing live, because our
cameras were already in position, the MQM began to fire at us, in order
to dissuade us from covering the event. In total 52 bullets were fired
at our office. Some of our workers had a very narrow escape. I was fired
on at least four times. It went on for about six hours. We kept on calling
for official help, and no response came."
The Pakistani media and human
rights groups collectively held the Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM),
a party closely aligned to the Musharraf government, chiefly responsible
for the violence in Karachi on May 12. Days later, the Muhajir Rabita
Group--an affiliate of the MQM--published a list of a dozen journalists
whose reportage it disapproved of. More recently, three of the named
journalists each found a bullet in an unmarked envelope in their cars.
Among those threatened are
employees of Dawn, an English-language daily, and the closest that Pakistan
has to a paper of record. In recent weeks, the paper has published details
of its own three-year long quarrel with Islamabad.
According to Hameed Haroon,
the paper's publisher, matters came to a head over its reporting of
deals with pro-Taliban elements in the areas that skirt Afghanistan
and Islamabad's continued support for Kashmiri jihadists. "The
government wanted a blackout on Baluchistan," he says. "You
cannot blackout 40-60 per cent of your territory simply to appease a
government that is not meeting its own security agenda. As a consequence
of rather open reportage on the Waziristan issue and on Baluchistan,
the government banned all advertising in Dawn."
The minister denies that
the withdrawal of public sector advertising, upon which several newspapers
rely, was politically motivated. "It is the prerogative of the
government to see which newspaper is most suitable for advertising,"
Azim says. "Nobody can demand that everybody has to be given advertising."
With the government loath
to allow journalists to report from Baluchistan and the tribal areas,
much of Pakistan's own war on terror has gone largely unreported. "We
have restricted access to some areas of Pakistan," explains Azim,
"not because we want to curb freedom of press but because we want
to ensure journalists' safety. All we ask is that journalists let us
know where they are going, and if we feel it is safe enough to let them
travel, we have no worries at all. Other times, we say to them we will
escort you there--only for their own security. We don't want another
Daniel Pearl tragedy on our hands."
Omar Waraich
is a freelance journalist based in London. He can be reached at [email protected]
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.