How
The Republicans Could Win
It All Back in 2008
By Heather Wokusch
16 November, 2006
Countercurrents.org
As
much as I enjoyed the midterm rout, I just can't shake the feeling that
it might be a set up.
A number of bloggers have
noted the perfect storm which helped drive the GOP out of power: Bob
Woodward's book on the administration's mishandling of Iraq, intelligence
estimates that Iraq had become a recruitment vehicle for terrorists,
the steady stream of corruption scandals culminating in Mark Foley's
timely resignation over the Congressional page scandal. Too good to
be true usually is.
Curious that the Republicans
failed to use its army of attorneys to challenge the election results.
Curious also that Rumsfeld's inevitable departure came after the elections.
The obvious fear is that
six years of Bush & Co.'s gross mismanagement will be pinned on
the Democrats in 2008.
Take the economy. Why would
the administration continue to stave off inflation, a bursting housing
bubble and high interest rates if the Democrats will be blamed? Why
continue to arm-twist Asian central banks into propping up the US dollar
or continue to hide the shrinking economy? Just blame the Democrats
for the tough economic times ahead.
And take Iraq. Please. While
the Democrats' recent call for a phased redeployment of troops is welcome
news, there's hardly party unity about how best to proceed. Consider
the fact that Tom Lantos (D-CA) is slated to chair the House International
Relations Committee in the next Congress. As Paul George of PeaceandJustice.org
recently noted, "Lantos isn't just a Democrat who voted for the
Iraq war, he was one of its co-authors. And his name appears high on
the list of credits for Gulf War I. Lantos has never met a war he didn't
like. His unblinking defense of Israeli policy gives him tunnel vision
with the rest of the Middle East. That's a potent combination of volatile
materials."
It's troubling enough that
Lantos channels the neo-cons' Middle East policy; he also can't be expected
to support sustained troop withdrawals in Iraq or a moderate approach
elsewhere in the region. Arguably even worse, if the US and/or Israel
actually goes ahead and bombs Iran, Lantos would not be the lone Democrat
supporting an escalation of the conflict, ostensibly to protect Israel.
Signals from top Democrats
that they will stand behind Robert Gates to be the next Defense Secretary
are also disturbing, given ongoing questions over Gates' role in the
Iran-Contra affair and charges of his having politicized intelligence
at the CIA. If the Democrats give Gates a blank check during his confirmation
hearings, they will have some explaining to do in 2008.
It's also dangerous to ignore
the Republicans' ongoing internal coup - tossing overboard tokens such
as Rumsfeld (and soon, UN Ambassador John Bolton) to strengthen the
party's chances in 2008. For that reason, impeachment hearings, if any
actually land on Pelosi's "table," will have to cast a wider
net than merely Bush. He's already a lost cause to the Republicans and
could act as a fall guy for more viable GOP candidates in the next elections.
So what would help the Democrats
in 2008? Serious investigations into the US electoral system, for one.
Victory doesn't mean the voting was free or fair - to think otherwise
is both hubris and a trap. The systematic disenfranchisement of African-Americans
and Hispanics, the lack of integrity of voting machines and the multiple
dirty tricks demand justice between now and 2008.
In fact, there should be
investigations into Bush administration wrongdoings across the board,
including into prisoner abuse, war profiteering, executive branch misconduct,
intelligence manipulation, taxpayer subsidies for crony energy companies.
you name it. (How telling that only yesterday the administration asked
for Valerie Plame's lawsuit against Cheney and others to be dismissed
on grounds of immunity. The White House is obviously getting nervous.)
Investigations, subpoenas,
and the forced handover of secret administration documents would help
the Democrats shed light on many levels of Bush & Co.'s corruption
and malfeasance, which if properly communicated to the US public, could
only help the Democrats in 2008. Unfortunately, Senate Democratic Leader
Harry Reid has indicated that he's "not heavily into investigations,"
adding, "That should be way down at the bottom of our agenda."
Don't get me wrong; I'm delighted
that the Democrats prevailed in the midterms. It's just that Bush's
remaining lame-duck years present both opportunities and traps. The
Democrats must be careful not to be blamed for the administration's
wrongdoings. Systemic electoral corruption must be addressed and progressives
must challenge Democratic warmongers before it's too late. 2008 is fast
approaching.
Action Ideas:
1. To learn more about investigations
on Bush & Co. already carried out, visit the site of Rep. Waxman's
Government Reform Committee. Topics range from Abstinence-Only Education
to the Cheney Energy Task Force (www.democrats.reform.house.gov/investigations.asp).
Expect more investigations soon...
2. Before the 110th Congress
is in place, contact your senators and representatives with your ideas
and demands (www.congress.org). It's never too early.
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights