US 'Making Secret
Plans
To Attack Iran'
By Rupert Cornwell
18 January 2005
Independent
Read
The New Yorker Report Here
The
Pentagon has been conducting secret reconnaissance of potential target
sites inside Iran, The New Yorker magazine claimed yesterday, reigniting
the debate here over whether the US should take military action to destroy
Tehran's suspected nuclear weapons programme.
The report in The
New Yorker, by Seymour Hersh, the journalist who uncovered the
Abu Ghraib prison scandal, paints a picture of a rampant Pentagon that
under the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, is steadily gaining complete
control of covert operations.
According to Mr
Hersh, President George Bush has authorised commando and special forces
units to take action against terrorist targets in "as many as 10"
countries in the Middle East and south Asia. But the top strategic target
is Iran, say unidentified officials interviewed for the article. Both
US and European experts believe that the regime in Tehran is only a
few years from acquiring a nuclear weapon and a delivery system, under
development at "three dozen or more" sites scattered across
the country.
The reconnaissance
missions are said to have been under way "at least since last summer",
to identify targets that could be hit either by air strikes or commando
raids on the ground. "It's not 'if' we're going to do anything
against Iran," one former high-level intelligence official is quoted
as saying. "They're doing it."
If the report is
correct, the Pentagon is on the verge of triumph in its long struggle
with a discredited CIA for control of most covert operations. It now
appears that the CIA's paramilitary arm will be placed under Mr Rumsfeld's
control. Its operations would be reclassified as steps to "prepare
the battlefield" in the continuing war on terror. The Pentagon
would thus not be required to inform Congress of such activities - in
contrast to the CIA, which has to keep the House and Senate broadly
abreast of its activities.
There was no immediate
comment from the Pentagon on the claims. But Dan Bartlett, Mr Bush's
communications director, told CNN that the New Yorker report was "riddled
with inaccuracies", though he did not deny it outright.
The administration
was committed to negotiations over Iran, Mr Bartlett said. However,
he added, "no President at any juncture in history has ever taken
military options off the table" - implicit confirmation that the
Pentagon at the very least has contingency plans for military action.
The issue is sure
to feature during the confirmation hearing of Condoleezza Rice, at which
the Secretary of State-designate will be grilled on the administration's
second-term plans for Iran and North Korea, the other member of the
"axis of evil" identified by Mr Bush in his 2002 State of
the Union address. Her answers during the two-day session which begins
this morning should throw more light on where she stands in the tug
of war between moderates and neo-conservative hardliners over US foreign
policy.
As national security
adviser during the first Bush term, Ms Rice mostly steered a middle
course between the two factions. But if the New Yorker report is only
half right, there seems little doubt that, like her predecessor Colin
Powell, she will soon be embroiled in turf fights with Mr Rumsfeld -
usually allied with Dick Cheney, the Vice-President.
With some misgiving,
the Bush administration has gone along with a Europeaninitiative to
strike a deal with Tehran, whereby the latter would abandon its nuclear
ambitions in return for aid from the European Union.