Who
Allies With Whom Against Iran?
By Umur Talu, Sabah
23 September, 2007
Campaign
Iran
Recently Israeli warplanes dived
into the Syrian airspace to "rehearse an attack" and dropped
a "fuel tank" on the Turkish territory. The following scenarios
were suggested about the incident:
1. The Israeli warplanes took off from Israel but violated the Turkish
airspace as well:
a) By mistake;
b) Knowingly, intentionally.
2. The Israeli warplanes
took off from Turkey anyway:
a) Without informing Turkey;
b) With Turkey's (or some
of its institutions) knowledge.
3. The warplanes took off
from Israel, but Turkey was informed:
a) Turkey was informed, permission
to use its airspace was granted;
b) Furthermore, Turkey played
a significant role by providing Israel with specific intelligence.
4. The Israeli warplanes
performed a real attack reconnaissance and rehearsal:
a) For an attack on Syria;
b) For an attack on Iran.
5. The Israeli warplanes
did not perform the rehearsal on behalf of Israel only:
a) They did it as a joint
action and operation with the USA;
b) Beside the USA, Turkey
and its airspace were also rehearsed.
6. The Israeli warplanes
deliberately used the Turkish airspace:
a) As a fait accompli to
Turkey in order to create tension in her relation with Syria (Iran);
b) There are already joint
plans among the USA, Israel and Turkey for such cooperation.
7. Israel and the USA want
to use Turkey, especially in attacking Iran:
a) Turkey would never allow
or accept this;
b) Turkey may be obliged
or forced to. Or she is already part of these plans anyway.
So many scenarios and interpretations…
But this is the result:
(Turkish) Foreign Office
protested Israel and sought an explanation.
"It was a mistake"
mumbled Israel.
No mention of the dropped
fuel tanks or the violations by the warplanes was made on the [ Turkey's]
Chief of Staff's website, which keeps track of violations of the [Turkish]
airspace.
The Syrians dashed here;
while openly condemning Israel, they didn't say anything explicit to
us (besides what they have said behind closed doors). And the [Turkish]
State never disclosed to the public which of these scenarios was true.
But guess what Turkey's "greatest,
most pro-establishment" newspaper wrote on its website:
"The prevailing opinion
on this issue is the following: Why should we go through a crisis with
Israel because of Syria , which hosted terrorists for many years?"
Strange, isn't it?
But actually it is Northern
Iraq, rather than Syria , has been "the host of terrorists"
for a long time.
As for "the master of
the host" ("the landlord of the region" or "the
father of the invasion", if you will), it is the USA .
However, folks like these
cannot actually say "USA has been the host of terrorists for some
years now". Because that's the way they are. And even when holders
of "prevailing opinions " pretend to say that, this is actually
what is happening:
USA (and Israel) who want
to use "Turkey (at least its territory, bases and airspace) for
attacking Iran" are also using the "PKK for attacking Iran
".
PKK, which increasingly consists
(made to consist) of Kurds from Iran (and Syria), has been transformed
into a subsidiary "organisation for attacking on Iran". This
was done by the " host Iraqi Kurdish leaders", on "the
master of the masters' " USA (and Israel) account.
However, some Kurds in Turkey
and their political parties who claim to be "leftist, anti-imperialist
and anti-colonialist", has got nothing to say with regards to becoming
a tool of imperialism, being used as a pawn in pitting communities against
each other or acting as a hitman for the USA and Israel; let alone the
issue of " terrorism".
When "attacking Iran"
is the issue, the former and latter become "allies".
But lo and behold! What should
one make of a state that allows the USA and Israel to use its land and
airspace for "attacking Iran" and that of "a combat and
terror organization " that allows to be used by the USA and Israel?
Now they will also get the
French [Prime Minister] Sarkozy, who "doesn't want Turkey in the
EU", but clings to the USA and Israel and "wants an attack
on Iran ", to adopt a "carrots and sticks policy" towards
Turkey . In other words, Sarkozy will use the EU as bait for our territory,
airspace and bases.
(Translated from Turkish by Can Ertür)
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.