Turkish
Military Flexes
Its Muscles In Northern Iraq
By Peter Symonds
07 June, 2007
World
Socialist Web
Reports
of a Turkish military incursion into northern Iraq yesterday have highlighted
the escalating tensions between the two countries along the border.
In recent weeks, Turkish leaders have repeatedly warned that the Turkish
army would take action against separatist Kurdish Workers Party (PKK)
camps in Iraq, if US and Iraqi forces failed to do so. The PKK has waged
a guerrilla war inside Turkey for more than two decades.
Concerned to play down yesterday’s
incident, Turkish, Iraqi and American officials quickly issued formal
denials that any Turkish troops had crossed the border. Iraqi Foreign
Minister Hoshiyar Zebari told the media in Baghdad there was no evidence
of any incursion. In Washington, US National Security Council spokesman
Gordon Johndroe declared there had been “no new activity”
in northern Iraq.
In Ankara, Turkish Foreign
Minister Abdullah Gul also denied the reports, but did not rule out
future Turkish military operations. “There is no such thing, no
such entry to another country,” he told NTV television. “If
such a thing happens, then we would announce it. We are in a war with
terror, we will do whatever is necessary to fight terrorism.”
Nevertheless, three unnamed
Turkish officials confirmed to Associated Press that several hundred
Turkish troops had been involved in a “hot pursuit” raid
into a remote mountainous region of northern Iraq yesterday. One source
based in the border region said 600 commandos, backed by several thousand
troops on the border, entered Iraq before dawn and returned later in
the day. He claimed that the raid across from the Turkish border town
of Cukurca was in response to an attack by PKK rebels inside Iraqi territory.
According to Associated Press, the three officials stood by their comments
despite government denials.
Jabar Yawir, a deputy minister
in the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in northern Iraq, yesterday
told Reuters: “This afternoon 10 Turkish helicopters landed in
a village in Mazouri, which is... 3 kilometres inside the Iraqi border.
They landed around 150 Turkish special forces. After two hours they
left and there were no confrontations with the PKK.” He confirmed
that the village was in an area controlled by the PKK.
Whatever its exact character,
the Turkish operation yesterday is part of a pattern of confrontation
that threatens to boil over into a large-scale military invasion. According
to media reports last week, the Turkish military has boosted its forces
on the Iraqi border with large contingents of extra soldiers, tanks
and armoured personnel carriers. On Sunday and Monday, Turkish troops
reportedly shelled PKK positions inside northern Iraq.
In an interview with NTV
News Channel on May 29, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
reinforced the message that the continued existence of PKK camps inside
Iraq would not be tolerated. “We want all acts of the terrorist
organisation to come to an end. We expect the United States and Iraq
to eradicate the terrorist organisation’s camps in northern Iraq.
We have already informed them of our expectations,” he said. The
prime minister did not rule out a unilateral Turkish intervention. The
PKK has an estimated 4,000 fighters in northern Iraqi camps.
Turkish Chief of General
Staff, General Yasar Buyukanit, put the matter more bluntly on May 31,
telling reporters he favoured a military incursion to clean out the
PKK bases. He said the military was ready, but the order had to come
from the government. “The political authorities must determine
whether, once we go in, we act only against the PKK, or if something
will happen with [KRG President Massoud] Barzani as well... I already
told Turkey and the world on April 12 that we need this... As military
men, we are ready, but all military men need orders.”
An intense political crisis
in Ankara is undoubtedly a factor in these threats. Fresh elections
are due on July 22 in a bid to break the constitutional crisis that
erupted over the failure of the ruling Islamist Party for Justice and
Development (AKP) to secure parliamentary support for its presidential
nominee—foreign minister Gul. In the course of the political standoff,
which has witnessed large opposition rallies, the Turkish military issued
a thinly veiled warning that it would intervene directly to defend the
country’s secular state. In the lead-up to the election, AKP leaders—determined
not to be outflanked politically—have proclaimed their opposition
to “terrorism” and offered cautious support for a military
assault in northern Iraq.
While the tensions on the
Turkish-Iraqi border involve a good deal of posturing by both the government
and the military, there is no doubt that the Turkish establishment as
a whole is hostile, not only to repeated PKK attacks inside Turkey,
but to the emergence of a quasi-independent Kurdish state in northern
Iraq. As the price of their support for the 2003 US-led invasion, the
two major Kurdish nationalist parties in Iraq—the Kurdish Democratic
Party (KDP) and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)—insisted on
the establishment of an autonomous Kurdish region with extensive powers
and its own security forces.
Opposition to Kirkuk referendum
General Buyukanit’s
provocative reference to KRG President Barzani was no mistake. The two
men were at loggerheads in April after Barzani accused Turkey of interfering
in preparations for a referendum later this year on the inclusion of
the northern, oil-rich Iraqi city of Kirkuk in the Kurdish region, and
threatened to retaliate. It would be easy, he warned, for Iraqi Kurds
to stir up their 30 million ethnic brethren in southeastern Turkey.
Buyukanit responded by declaring that a cross-border attack was necessary
and that the Turkish military was ready to carry it out. The Turkish
government demanded that the US haul Barzani into line.
Ankara is bitterly opposed
to the extension of the Kurdish region to Kirkuk, which has a substantial
Turkomen, as well as Arab, population. More fundamentally, Turkish leaders
fear that the addition of Kirkuk’s oil wealth to the Kurdish region
will establish the economic basis for the KRG to declare full independence—a
move that would provide political encouragement for Kurdish separatists
in Turkey, as well as Syria and Iran. Inside Kirkuk itself, sectarian
violence is escalating as Kurdish leaders press ahead with their demand
for a referendum despite the opposition of Arab and Turkomen residents.
The prospect of a Turkish
invasion of northern Iraq again demonstrates that the US neo-colonial
occupation has not only created a catastrophe for the Iraqi people,
but profoundly destabilised relations throughout the Middle East. Just
as the ousting of Saddam Hussein and the Sunni establishment in Baghdad
helped fuel Sunni-Shiite sectarian tensions in Iraq and the broader
region, so the US encouragement of Kurdish nationalists in northern
Iraq has resurrected unresolved issues that date back to the collapse
of the Ottoman empire following World War I. The emerging Turkish state
laid claim too much of northern Iraq but was rebuffed by Britain, which
ruled over newly-formed Iraq and was determined to retain control of
the oil fields in the north.
The confrontation between
Turkey and the Kurdish regional government underscores the incoherent
and reckless character of the Bush administration’s foreign policy.
As the Economist magazine caustically noted in an article on June 5:
“The number of awkward questions raised [for Washington] is as
great as the number of overlapping alliances and rivalries in the region.
The Kurds are America’s best friends in Iraq and a decent advertisement
that at least something has gone right in that bloodied country. Many
plans for an American exit from Iraq involve leaving some forces in
the relatively peaceful region. So a Turkish invasion would be a disaster,
inserting NATO’s second-largest army in the middle of territory
America is desperately hoping to keep calm.”
The US administration has
repeatedly warned Turkey against any military incursion. In a pointed
reminder of American strength, two US warplanes briefly entered Turkish
airspace near the Iraqi border on May 24, drawing a rapid protest from
Ankara that such violations “should not happen again”. Last
weekend Defence Secretary Robert Gates reiterated that the US “hopes
there would not be a unilateral military action across the border into
Iraq”.
At the same time, the US
does not want to alienate Turkey, which is an important NATO ally and
economic partner. While urging Turkey not to unilaterally intervene
in northern Iraq, Washington has continued to denounce the PKK as “terrorists”
and sought to placate Ankara. Since 2003, the US has permitted Turkey
to maintain a force of some 1,300 troops, nominally as observers, inside
northern Iraq, causing friction with the Kurdish leadership. Last year
Washington appointed retired air force general, Joseph Ralston, as a
special envoy to Ankara to coordinate a joint approach on the PKK.
However, the US administration’s
ability to maintain this delicate balancing act is further complicated
by its barely disguised support for Kurdish guerrillas using bases in
northern Iraq to operate inside Iran. As the Economist explained: “According
to many reports, America is stirring Kurdish ambitions in Iran, where
the world’s biggest bunch [of] stateless people also have a significant
presence. American assistance to Iranian Kurds may involve military
assistance, and those Kurds may also operate from bases in Iraq. In
other words, the Turks could find themselves shooting at Kurds who are
firing back with American-supplied weapons.”
In fact, the ties between
Kurdish separatists fighting in Iran and Turkey are even closer than
the Economist has cautiously suggested. Several reports point to the
fact that the Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan (PEJAK), which at the
very least appears to be encouraged by the US, and probably Israel,
to conduct surveillance and attacks inside Iran, is an offshoot of the
PKK. Both organisations have bases inside northern Iraq and in all probability
continue to maintain relations. So while the US continues to join Turkey
in denouncing the PKK as a “terrorist” outfit, it is tacitly
promoting its sister group, the PEJAK, as an organisation fighting for
Kurdish liberation in neighbouring Iran.
The cynical character of
the US “war on terror” is not lost in Turkey, where anti-American
sentiment is on the rise, not only over perceived US support for Kurdish
separatists, but the criminal occupation of Iraq and threats against
Iran. In 2003, opposition to the US invasion was so widespread that
the AKP-dominated parliament felt compelled to prohibit the use of Turkish
military bases, forcing the Pentagon to modify its plans. According
to the Washington Post, recent polls in Turkey show that only 12 percent
of respondents view the US favourably.
In the lead-up to the upcoming
election, Turkish politicians are stirring up anti-Kurdish sentiment
and will no doubt appeal to anti-American sentiment by criticising the
US for failing to halt continuing PKK attacks. An estimated 30,000 people
have been killed in clashes between the military and the PKK since 1984,
including 600 last year. For the Bush administration, the political
danger exists that its NATO ally will be driven into closer collaboration
with its arch-enemy Iran against the Kurdish rebels, right at the point
when Washington is intensifying its confrontation with Tehran.
Through its backing for the
venal Kurdish leaders in Iraq and their ambitions to carve out a Kurdish
statelet, the US has opened up a political can of worms for which it
has no answers and which threatens to drag the region into another bloody
quagmire. While the Turkish government and military appear at this stage
to be holding back from a full-scale invasion of northern Iraq and a
rupture of relations with the US, none of the parties to the dispute
are in control of what is a highly volatile situation.
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.