India
Drowning In Pesticides
By Vandana Shiva
17 August, 2006
Zmag
The issue of toxics and poisons
in our food system has once again moved to the contre of national concern.
CSE's study on pesticides in Coke and Pepsi shows that three years after
the Joint Parliamentary Committee, no action has been taken by the cola
giants. Pesticide content continues to be 25 times higher than norms
in Pepsi brands and 22 times higher than norms in Coke brands. And the
toxics like phosphoric acid and ethyl glycol continue to be added for
which the Supreme Court has served notice on the cola companies.
Meantime, inspite of India
being self-sufficient in wheat with 73 million tonnes of production,
under U.S pressure India is importing pesticide laden wheat. On 4th
of August 2006, the Supreme Court of India admitted a Public Interest
Litigation filed by our organization, Navdanya, related to toxic wheat
imports.
The Indian Supreme Court
admitted Navdanya's petition challenging the Government's decision to
import wheat. The Indian Government, under US pressure after the singing
of US - India Knowledge Initiative decided to allow wheat imports even
though imports were not necessary and consignments fail to meet health
and phyto-sanitary norms.
The Government has significantly
relaxed quality specifications for import of wheat. This comes out clearly
through a comparison of the standards laid down in the State Trading
Corporation of India's (STC) latest tender of May 8 with those in its
previous tender floated on February 20.
The wheat that arrived from
Australia in April 2006 at Chennai Port was unfit for consumption as
the pesticide content was 0.25 ppm (parts per million) which was 500%
over the permissible level of 0.05 ppm.
While succumbing to pressure,
the State Trading Corporation's tender ofMay 8 does not mention its
earlier specification that imported wheat be "free from moulds",
and similarly, against the earlier stringent specification that the
wheat "shall be completely free from Argemone mexicana, Lathyrus
sativus, dwarf bunt (Tilletia contraversa) and ergot (Cleviceps purpurea)",
it stops at the first two. It permits presence of the other two fungal
pathogens - dwarf bunt and ergot fungi - to the extent of 0.005 per
cent and 0.01 per cent respectively. There are also a couple of other
relaxations, including Bromus rigidus, an exotic weed seed, which is
missing from the tender.
While the international quality
parameters are being tightened the world over to ensure that invasive
alien species do not use the vehicle of commodity trade to enter into
a country, India is busy relaxing the quality norms thereby opening
the floodgates to noxious weeds, deadly insect pests and dreaded plant
diseases and pesticides
Violating the norms of the
Codex Alimentarius and the International Plant Protection Convention,
to both of which India is a signatory, no scientific sampling was done
to ascertain the percentage of alien matter, dust particles and pesticides
residues.
Past experiences shows that
several of the minor weeds that came along with PL-480 wheat shipments
into India during sixties have turned into biological nuisances, often
becoming a national menance. The noxious Pathenium weed came with American
wheat and now occupies 15 per cent of the country's geographical area.
So far 35 lakh tonne of wheat
import has been finalized. Recently, eight companies have submitted
bids for supplying four lakh tonne of wheat to the State Trade Corporation.
Cargill is the biggest bidder for maximum quantity at 3.4 lakh tonne
and AWB has offered to supply about 2.2 lakh tonne. However, none has
offered to supply the entire four lakh tonne.
India is the second largest
producer and consumer of wheat. If India's wheat production is undermined
by imports, there will be global scarcity and increase in wheat prices.
This case is critical for the defense of food sovereignty of India's
farmers and people everywhere.
While wheat imports bring
pesticides, domestically too the pesticide industry is spreading pesticides
in our food system. Corporations selling toxic pesticides are stating
that India will loose Rs. 550,000 million in the current summer season
if adequate doses of pesticides are not applied. They estimate an annual
crop less of Rs. 900,000 due to incidence of pests in both summer and
winder seasons (Financial Express, August 1, 2006).
There is a false assumption
prevalent in society that without pesticides we cannot grow enough food,
and hence food safety has to be sacrificed for food security.
However our two decades of
practice and promotion of organic farming show that biodiverse organic
farming increases productivity while reducing pesticide and fertilizer
use. Food safety and food security go hand in hand.
Our experience and studies
show that organic farming based on principles of diversity and agro
ecology is the only sustainable method of controlling pests. Pesticides
in fact do not control pests through creating resistance and resurgence,
they create pests. Pests are a symptom of an unstable, non-sustainable
agriculture. Ecologically balanced agriculture has not pest damage.
The most effective pest control mechanism is built into the ecology
of crops, partly by ensuring balanced pest-predator relationships through
crop diversity and partly by building up resistance in plants. Organic
manuring is now being shown to be critical to such a building up of
resistance.
The Green Revolution strategy fails to see the ecology of pests as well
as that of pesticides because it is based on subtle balances within
the plant and invisible relationships of the plant to its environment.
It therefore simplistically reduces the management of pests to the violent
use of poisons which are in reality were chemicals. It also fails to
recognize that pests have natural enemies with the unique property of
regulating pest populations.
In de Bach's view, "The
philosophy of pest control by chemicals has been to achieve the highest
kill possible, and per cent mortality has been the main yardstick in
the early screening of new chemicals in the lab. Such an objective,
the highest kill possible, combined with ignorance of or disregard for,
nontarget insects and mites is guaranteed to be the quickest road to
upset resurgence and the development of resistance to pesticide."
De Bach's research on DDT
induced pest increase showed that these increases could be anywhere
from thirty-six fold to over twelve hundred fold. The aggravation of
the problem is directly related to the violence unleashed on the natural
enemies of pests. Reductionist science, which fails to perceive the
natural balance, also fails to anticipate and predict what happen when
that balance is disturbed.
Thus Bt. Cotton was introduced
to control the bollworm. However, as a recent study by the Chinese Academy
of Science and Cornell University shows, Bt. Cotton farmers have to
spray 18.22 times, which are more than 3 times higher than sprays on
conventional cotton. The study further reveals that farmers spend 40%
more on pesticides designed to kill an emerging secondary pest. Secondary
pests like Mirid are rarely found in cotton prior to adoption of Bt.
Cotton. In the Indian trials of Bt. Cotton, showed that non-target species
like Aphids and Jassids are 300-400% higher on Bt. Cotton than in non
Bt. Cotton.
Farmers suicides are concentrated
in Bt. Cotton areas because of high costs of seeds and pesticides. Inspite
of Bt. Cotton failing, the Government is preparing to commercialise
Bt. Brinjal. This will increase pesticide use, not decease it. And in
addition it will introduce new health risks from the toxic Cry1Ac gene,
and genes for antibiotic resistance such as npt11.
India stands at a watershed
in our food economy and food culture.
On the one hand we have corporations
like Coke and Pepsi pushing hazardous cold drinks, corporations like
Monsanto selling toxic genetically engineered seeds, and corporations
like Cargill and AWB importing toxic contaminated wheat. We also have
government coming to the aid of corporations through liberalized imports
and deregulation of the food industry through the recently introduced
Food Safety and Standards Act 2006.
On the other hand we have
movements like Navdanya promoting safe, healthy, nutritious food and
drinks, protecting our biological diversity and cultural diversity.
Only the future will tell if corporations selling toxics and poisons
will rule our lives or as free and democratic citizens we will live
in a toxic free, pesticide free, GMO free India.