My
Redeployment Epiphany
By Mary Shaw
31 January, 2007
Countercurrents.org
I
used to think that we had an obligation to stay in Iraq for a while,
to rebuild the country that we have destroyed over the past four years.
As a human rights advocate, my primary concern is for the wellbeing
of the innocent Iraqi civilians. Don't we owe them a rebuilt infrastructure,
rebuilt homes, rebuilt schools, and rebuilt lives? You break it, you
fix it. It's only fair.
But, with each passing day,
I find myself thinking more and more that it's time to cut our losses
- and the losses of the Iraqi people - and bring our troops home, along
with all those corporate contractors who are getting rich off the blood
of the war dead.
On May 1, 2003, George W.
Bush stood in his Halloween costume and codpiece on the flight deck
of the USS Abraham Lincoln and declared, "Major combat operations
in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our
allies have prevailed."
Hmmmmmmmm.
If that were true, then May
2, 2003, was the time to start rebuilding. Instead, we kept on destroying
more and more of Iraq, and killing and maiming more and more innocent
Iraqis, until they finally got fed up and started fighting back in a
so-called insurgency.
Then, on June 20, 2005, Dick
Cheney proclaimed, "I think they're in the last throes, if you
will, of the insurgency."
Hmmmmmmmm.
If that were true, then June
21, 2005, was the time to start rebuilding. Instead, our troops kept
fighting just to stay alive, and to maintain some degree of order in
the green zone. The rest of Iraq was by then a powder keg. If anything,
it was any semblance of a burgeoning unified Iraqi democracy that was
in its last throes.
And now Bush wants to keep
on killing, so much so that he is going to send another 21,500 troops
into that situation where we're not wanted. That's 21,500 more targets.
21,500 more lives in the balance.
Four years ago, Bush told
us that we were going to Iraq to liberate the Iraqi people from the
repressive regime of Saddam Hussein. And now the "insurgents"
are fighting to liberate the Iraqi people from the repressive regime
of George W. Bush.
We've done enough damage.
Rebuilding is not on the table. The American people want us out of Iraq.
The Iraqi people want us out of Iraq. The Iraqi government wants us
out of Iraq. And we have no legitimate reason to stay.
Furthermore, we can leave
Iraq without leaving a hopeless mess behind, if only we can do it right,
and that means diplomacy.
To that end, Rep. Lynn Woolsey
(D-CA) seems to have the solution, in the form of H.R. 508, which will
"require United States military disengagement from Iraq, [and]
provide United States assistance for reconstruction and reconciliation
in Iraq."
This bill would bring our
troops home from Iraq within a six-month timeframe. During that timeframe,
the bill would accelerate the training of a permanent Iraqi security
force.
It would rescind the Congressional
authorization for the war in Iraq.
Upon request from the Iraqi
government, the bill would authorize U.S. support for an international
stabilization force. Surely an international force, perhaps under the
auspices of the United Nations, would do a better job of stabilizing
Iraq than we could. The UN has its problems, but they're not the Bush
White House.
Also worth mentioning, the
bill would prohibit the construction of permanent U.S. military bases
in Iraq. This could be the greatest step of all in the "war on
terror". After all, it's the presence of U.S. military bases on
Arab-Islamic land (not that they "hate our freedom") that
was the primary motivator of Osama bin Laden's jihad against America.
And the bill would ensure
that the U.S. has no long-term control over Iraqi oil. Sorry, Halliburton.
Sorry, Exxon. Sorry, Chevron. The free lunch is over. Under this plan,
Iraq (and its oil) would once again belong to the Iraqis.
And maybe then they could
truly be liberated, maybe even by July 4th. What a fabulous coincidence
it would be if that date could go down in history as an Independence
Day for the Iraqis, too.
Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist. She currently
serves as Philadelphia Area Coordinator for Amnesty International, and
her views on politics, human rights, and social justice issues have
appeared in numerous online forums and in newspapers and magazines worldwide.
Note that the ideas expressed in this article are the author's own,
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Amnesty or any other
organization with which she may be associated. E-mail [email protected].
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights