Lies,
Damned Lies And Terrorists
By Ziauddin Sardar
19 May, 2007
Countercurrents.org
We
take it for granted that the terrorists stalking Europe are all Muslims.
Hardly surprising, given that major terrorist atrocities in Europe from
the Madrid bombings to the 7 July attacks were carried out by young
Muslim men. Add daily headlines of "Muslim threats", routine
revelations of "terrorist plots" foiled or around the corner,
and it all begins to appear a self-evident truth. But self-evident truths,
I know from experience, often turn out to be false under cursory scrutiny.
These are facts. In 2006,
there were 498 incidents described as "terrorist attacks"
across the European Union. Exactly 424 of these attacks were carried
out by "separatist terrorists" such as the Basque group Eta,
operating in Spain and France, and were limited to the Basque region
and Corsica. Eta itself was responsible for 136 of these. Left-wing
and anarchist groups, active in Germany, Greece, Italy and Spain, carried
out 55 attacks. The vast majority of these resulted in lim ited material
damage and were not designed to kill. Only one, carried out by Eta in
Madrid, was deadly, producing two fatalities.
Where do Muslim terrorists
fit in all this? The Muslim extremists were responsible for a single
attack in Germany . On 31 July, two suitcases packed with explosive
devices were placed on board regional trains in the Cologne area. The
devices failed to detonate. Two Lebanese nationals were subsequently
arrested and charged. The suspects claimed to have been motivated by
the Danish cartoons affair. In addition, there were two planned attacks,
one in Denmark and the other in Britain, both of which were allegedly
foiled. They do not feature in the 498 total.
These statistics come from
the EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT) 2007, published
by no less a reliable source than the European Police Office, or Europol.
Terrorism, says the report, is not new to Europe, but its context has
changed. It has two new features: it is essentially transnational and
it is characterised by "externality" - that is, actions taken
by one country have implications for other countries. For example, security
measures taken by one country may divert a terrorist attack to another.
Apart from what it calls
"Islamist terrorism", the report identifies two other types
of terrorists: "ethno-nationalists and separatist groups",
such as Eta and the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), and left-wing terror
groups such as Greece's Revolutionary Struggle.
While Muslim terrorists get
all the press and the attention, the vast majority of low-intensity
attacks against businesses and governments, as the figures show, are
actually carried out by terrorists who have nothing to do with Islam.
Islam, however, features largely when it comes to arrests. Seven hundred
and six individuals in total were arrested last year on suspicion of
terrorism-related activities in the EU. Of these, 257 were clearly Muslim.
But to these we must also add 156 British arrests, because Britain,
says the report, did not provide details regarding arrested suspects
due to ongoing trials. So we have 413 Muslims - well over half the total
- arrested throughout Europe on terrorism charges.
Which brings us back to perceptions
and what we take for granted. The Europol report makes it clear that
Muslims are responsible for very little terrorism in Europe, but they
are the group most likely to be arrested on suspicion of terrorism.
In Britain, a long beard or a headscarf spells terrorist. In France
and Spain, being Moroccan or Tunisian or Algerian is enough for you
to be classified as a terrorist. In Germany and Holland, speaking Turkish
is equivalent to declaring terrorist intentions.
The scale of our fears never
works by the numbers, and the numbers can never be an argument for complacency.
Yet there is something instructive in being constantly reminded of these
figures, which have remained consistent over the years. This is not
a case of seeking to prove anything with damned lies and statistics;
on the contrary, the numbers should tell us that we are highly selective
with our fears. The best analogy I can give is the weather. When it
is extremely cold, we express ourselves in Celsius: "It's going
to be -3 tonight." But when we have a hot spell, we rush back to
the alarmism of Fahrenheit: "Ninety-five! What a scorcher!"
The reality we need to figure
out is how far our selective fears do the terrorists' work for them.
When we create draconian, illiberal defences on the presumption of a
perceived threat, we are also terrorising the undifferentiated mass
of European citizens who are Muslim and have legitimate fears of being
demonised, marginalised and deemed guilty.
What the numbers tell us
is that the hardest thing to achieve is a risk assessment of imponderables
and unknowns. It is a great deal easier to contrive self-fulfilling
prophesies.
And that is why we need to
be more careful in determining whether we will fear in Celsius or in
Fahrenheit.
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.
Click
here to comment
on this article