Public
Terror: Escalating
The War On Migrants
By Juan Santos &
Leslie Radford
15 May, 2007
Countercurrents.org
“War is nothing
but a continuation of politics by other means.”
von Clausewitz
“Politics is war without bloodshed, while war is politics
with bloodshed.”
Mao
(LOS ANGELES) Immigration
activist Roberto Lovato was there when the Los Angeles Police Department
launched its brutal assault on a park full of migrant families with
children last week in LA, and this is what he saw and understood. “I
saw the LAPD,” he wrote “dragging the immigrants and the
entire country into dangerous terrain, a new threshold in the . . .
immigration war raging around the country.”
What he saw was more than
an Iraq-style surge; this was an all out escalation, a new strategic
plateau in the US government’s War on Migrants.
Javier Rodriguez, an immigration
activist with L.A’s March 25th Coalition, called it a “political
decision” to “dismantle this [immigrant rights] movement.”
Last year, in 2006, millions
of migrant and their allies – their familia – took the streets,
giving birth to the most powerful mass movement in the U.S. since the
Civil Rights and Black Power movements of the 1960s and 70s.
The new movement stunned
the US ruling class, drove the deepest of wedges straight into the heart
of a seemingly unstoppable neo–con drive toward fascism, exposed
the essential brutality and racism at the core of the Republican, neo–con
agenda, began the public unraveling of the Bush regime, and opened the
door to the stunning exposure, repudiation and defeat of the neo-cons
in the House and Senate, who had led the racist charge to make felons
of all undocumented migrants – and of anyone who so much as gave
a ride to someone undocumented.
And like their counterparts
in the 60s era, the reactionaries of today saw the unmistakable outlines
of the threat presented by brown resistance to their power and their
drive toward a fascistic state. Like the reactionaries of that era,
they moved to kill the movement with mass arrests and state intimidation.
Only this time, it wasn’t the FBI, COINTELPRO, the murders or
imprisonment of Black leaders, or the mass incarceration of Black and
other peoples of color that the State relied on. This time, it was the
department of Homeland Security, ICE, and a strategy of direct vengeance
– the deliberate terrorization of the millions who had taken the
streets and who had precipitated the collapse of the neo-fascist juggernaut.
The methodology was not the
one the reactionaries used to crush AIM on the Pine Ridge Lakota Reservation
in the 70s, or in Guatemala and El Salvador, nations from which many
of today’s migrants fled – no death squads yet this year.
Now, rather, the weapons
include mass raids on meat packing plants, pre-dawn raids by ICE agents
on people’s homes, incarceration in prisons thousands of miles
away from lawyers, families and friends, and the terrorization of small
children whose parents had been locked away, or who were themselves
taken into custody and locked up like felons in federal prisons with
their mothers and fathers.
That this year’s pro-migrant
demonstrations were dramatically smaller than those last year came as
no surprise to the movement’s leadership. Shortly before the pro–migrant
demonstrations on May Day this year, Panama Alba, an immigrants’
rights activist with New York’s May 1st Coalition, , spoke plainly
of the impact of the government’s effort to crush the new movement.
“In light of the raids, any migrant who steps into the streets
is a hero or heroine," he said.
But the signal-sending, intimidation
and terrorization didn’t stop with secretive raids on people’s
homes in the dead of night or on isolated factories and packing plants.
Chicago, the city that set
the pace for last year’s massive protests, faced a new reality
this year, when, a week before the scheduled mass protests of May 1,
ICE carried out its first mass raid in a public place, a shopping mall
in the heart of the Mexican American district La Villita, marching into
the mall with bullet proof vests and carrying M-16 military assault
rifles, shutting down the mall, and holding brown employees and customers
alike for questioning at gunpoint, while letting whites go free. A Chicago
immigrants rights activist said, “They sat people down on the
ground and busted down bathroom doors…Only 12 people were arrested
in Chicago, but there were 250 people being held. But people didn’t
run away. They were furious and we started protesting immediately.”
And, in Los Angeles, the
storm center of the national struggle for migrant’s rights, the
LAPD, under the leadership of the nation’s “top cop,”
Republican police chief William Bratton, made another strategic intervention
aimed at nationwide intimidation of the new movement; a brutal, no holds
barred, clearly premeditated, tight and highly disciplined police assault
on an entirely peaceful gathering of migrant families with children
– hundreds of children – in MacArthur Park – an assault
involving some 600 cops who struck pedestrians with moving motorcycles,
and who, while marching in close formation, fired uncounted volumes
of tear gas and volley after volley of rubber bullets from “less
lethal weapons,” shooting indiscriminately into the crowd, waiting
on cue and in unison for the crowd before them to retreat, while viciously
clubbing journalists, smashing cameras, and striking anyone else they
could strike with repeated blows from batons. Seventy people were injured
and sent to hospitals. Despite LAPD claims that the attack was in reaction
to having been pelted with plastic water bottles and rocks by young
“agitators”, and despite the hundreds of police present,
not a single arrest was made. While the young people did, very bravely,
hold a protective line between the cops and the families under attack
– taking the brunt of police violence on their own bodies, the
assault on the migrant families was in no way “provoked,”
any more than the ICE raid in the Chicago mall was provoked.
The LAPD assault has been
compared to the infamous and racist repression unleashed by police chief
Bull Conner of Birmingham, Alabama against the Civil Rights movement
when the Old South was still the Old South. African American writer
Anthony Abdullah Samad says of Bratton, “He'll never be able to
explain away the rubber bullets hitting women and children. No more
than Bull Connor could justify turning fire hoses and dogs on women
and children in Birmingham in 1963.”
But the whole point was to
incite widespread terror and intimidation - that’s precisely why
no one – not children, not journalists, not pregnant women, was
spared from the onslaught. Far from the LAPD being once again “exposed”
as the nation’s most brutal pigs, the worldwide media coverage,
especially and intensely concentrated on Spanish language TV in the
U.S., was a public relations coup of a high order for those bent on
striking fear and crushing any further resistance to pre-dawn raids,
the plans for massive construction of new immigration prisons, the further
incarceration of children in a Texas-style Guantanamo, or the even more
massive raids and mass deportations to come.
The powers that be could
not have picked a more chilling place from which to have signaled their
brutal message to the pro migrant movement. LA has the largest population
of migrants in the nation, and a Chican@ mayor and political establishment
with a level of power unrivalled by Brown people anywhere in the nation
– no where else in the US can migrant populations expect the kind
of sympathy and support that is ostensibly available in LA. But LA mayor
Antonio Villaraigosa, a “rising star” of the Democratic
Party, rode last year in a Pacific Palisades parade that included in
its official entourage a contingent from the “Minuteman Project,”
and kept his political distance as police stormed the South Central
Farm, brutally uprooting supporters of the many migrant families who
had grown their food there until faced with eviction in a shady deal
that involved secret deals and City Council improprieties.
The Mayor, after facing intense
criticism for his appearance at last year’s million- plus march
in downtown LA, arranged to be out of town for this year’s march.
This year, it was only after
criticism of the LAPD reached a red hot crescendo that the Mayor returned
from a trip abroad on “city business” to denounce the LAPD
attack as a human rights violation, and to attempt to quell any mass
“unrest” that might be brewing.
LAPD Chief Bill Bratton, in the meantime, is having none of the Mayor’s
human rights rhetoric. Two high ranking LAPD officers have been reassigned,
while Bratton has pointed to “tactical errors,” falsely
implying the cops were “out of control” rather than fulfilling
a strategic political imperative of the Bush regime. But the cops were
not out of control, this was no police riot; the police were acting
with discipline on direct orders from Bratton’s Deputy Chiefs,
making it clear that the planning for the police assault occurred at
the highest levels, in all probability in meetings with Bratton himself,
who has strong ties to the Department of “Homeland Security,”
and who has been mentioned as a potential candidate to head the DHS
under George W. Bush.
Were Bratton to land that
post, he would not only head up the government’s internal spying
program, but would be the ultimate head of ICE, and responsible for
carrying out Homeland Security’s “Operation Endgame”,
with its objective of raiding, rounding up, imprisoning and deporting
millions of migrants.
On May 1, at MacArthur Park,
Bratton may have proven himself “fit” for just such a vile
job.
In the meantime, if legislation
now before Congress is approved, local police, including the LAPD, would
have the authority, and funding from the Department of Homeland Security
to carry out public raids in areas where migrants concentrate; to act
as local enforcers of national laws on immigration, to help carry out
the mass deportations of brown people that Operation Endgame implies.
That’s the plan. That’s the trajectory. Conversely, if no
legislation is passed this year, and no moratorium on raids is declared,
Operation Endgame remains the official policy of the DHS and ICE. In
the absence of any other plan, Bush’s raids can only intensify,
and do so with the aim of fulfilling the goals of Endgame; it will be
the only policy on the books.
The attacks in LA and Chicago were by no means random, and by no means
local in their meaning or impact. The neo-con powers that be brought
forth their latest “surge” in the War on Migrants and the
Chican@ community, and signaled with unmistakable clarity their intent
to crush the movement that has cost them so much and that has threatened
the stability of their rule.
The Bush escalation of the
War on Migrants, and the plan to bring police into the battle at a national
level – a move backed by Republicans and Democrats alike –
means that from the standpoint of the white power elite of the US–
despite the rhetoric of one wing of the pro migrant movement –
“we are not America.” – que ”NO somos America.”
It means that the white power elite views migrants as a dangerous force
for political instability and for undermining the white cultural dominance
of the US. It means that migrants and the pro migrant movement are the
targets of America, no matter how many US flags are waved, how much
English is spoken, or how much profit is provided for the exploiters.
And the vulnerability of
the system- its open embarrassment at being exposed for it brutal machinations,
its efforts to cover its tracks, means that it is only resistance and
exposure that the system fears, and that only resistance and exposure
will cause it to back down from draconian measures, just as it south
to distance itself from the openly fascistic Sensenbrenner bill in 2006.
The resistance can take many
forms – barrio Migra Watch/ Ojo a la Migra committees, the continuing
establishment of Sanctuary cities and Sanctuary churches, the planning
of escape routes and the setting up of defense committees in factories
and other workplaces – and marches, many more marches, to demand
the end of raids and deportations, the firing of LAPD Chief Bratton,
full legalization of all, and the end to the exploitation of Latin American
and other third world economies by US finance capital. Without such
open and defiant resistance, the system will concede nothing, and the
future will hold nothing other than more brutality, more raids, more
vigilantes like the Minutemen, more destroyed families, and a more openly
racist culture ruled with the iron fist from the Right.
Leslie Radford is
a correspondent for Aztlan Electronic News and L.A. Indymedia. She can
be reached at [email protected]
Juan Santos is Los Angeles based writer and editor. His work can be
read at The Fourth World. He can be reached at [email protected]
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.
Click
here to comment
on this article