Murder
By Proxy: Hanging Of
Saddam Hussein
By Ram Puniyani
13 November, 2007
Countercurrents.org
The
hanging of Saddam, though sudden was extremely predictable. Since the
time he was captured by US armies and the case put up against him by
the puppet Iraqi Government, it was writing on the wall, that live Saddam
is still dangerous to US. He has been done away through the mock justice,
the 'judicial assassination' as some one has put it, or through the
justice of the Kangaroo court set up by the occupation army, under the
guise of democratically elected Government.
The reaction to this has
been extremely diverse. President Bush has hailed it as a path to democracy
in Iraq. Of course, democracy is projected to be the major plank of
US policy; but in fact it just a slogan for US invasions World around.
A section of Kurds and Shias have celebrated the event with joy as Saddam
had been oppressive against Kurds and Shias, both, during his dictatorial
regime. In India, Congress has come out to criticize the hanging, while
RSS progeny BJP has preferred to keep quiet on the issue. A large section
of observers have displayed their dismay over the way things are shaping
up in West Asia, while Arab World has condemned this act. A large section
of Muslim community has been deeply upset over this and has shown intense
displeasure over the hanging.
Saddam had a very complex
trajectory in Iraq. After coming to power, he did start the process
of modernization of Iraq, and was fairly secular in his approach to
social issues. He was not guided by clerics or by other so called religious
considerations. Iraq did begin its journey towards transformation in
social relationships of gender and other feudal hierarchies. Modern
education was given due importance and the plight of women in particular
saw a rapid change towards equality. With the overthrow of US stooge,
Raza Shah Pehlavi and coming in of Islamic Revolution in Iran, under
the leadership of Ayatollah Khomeini, the scene changed. Iraq was involved
in an eight year long war, in which it was duly supported by US in the
form of sharing of intelligence and supply of arms in huge quantities.
Saddam was looked up as an ally by the Western powers, more so by US.
It was during this period
that Islam began to be projected as a new threat to democracy by the
US, through its media and all other paraphernalia, and foundations for
consent for its policies in popular mind and the global opinion against
Islam began to be cultivated. It is during this period of alliance with
US that the atrocities on Shias and Kurds were committed with impunity.
With Kuwait drawing out disproportionate
oil through wells with common source, Iraq became concerned and marched
its armies on the Kuwaiti border. US ambassador Glisspe subtly hinted
to Saddam that US has no opinion on the issue meaning that he can do
whatever he liked in the area. That was good enough of a signal for
Saddam to attack Kuwait and to declare it as its 24th state. US turnaround
came sooner than expected and it started crying hoarse for protecting
the sovereignty of Sheikh of Kuwait. The attack on Iraq followed and
sanctions were imposed on Iraq, the result was the killing of thousands
and crippling of infinite number of Iraqi people more particularly children.
When asked whether such an intense move was needed in Iraq, it Secretary
of State, Madleine Albright answered in affirmative.
US designs in Iraq were to
unfold gradually after its occupation of Afghanistan, US started saying
that Iraq is in possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The UN commissioners
were deputed in Iraq who unequivocally gave the report that Iraq is
not in possession of any such weapons. Undeterred by that, US went on
to attack and occupy Iraq, marching lakhs of its armies. It was said
that this army is the liberation army and will be welcomed with roses
by the victims of Saddam. Soon imaginary roses turned into real guns
and resistance movement picked up in Iraq. So far, while US army has
'liberated', by killing, over five lakh Iraqis, the resistance reaction
has sent over five thousand body bags to US, the bags containing the
bodies of US soldiers on the 'mission democracy', the pet slogan of
US in its design to control the World and appropriate the oil resources
in the region.
In its blinded march for
control over oil wells, US continued its project of demonizing Islam
and creating Islamophobia, well supported by the vested elements all
over the World. Its policies in the oil rich area, has sent shivers
down the spine of large section of Muslim community all over the World
and it is perceived as the Great Satan. So a large section of Muslim
community is wary of any step by US. Every further action by greatest
violator Human rights ever in the World further frightens this community.
Of course there are further supplementary reasons for the same. The
veneer of its democratic values is too thin and it keeps peeling off
with every other move. Its shameless greed for oil and power is too
obvious to be overlooked.
US has been and is the biggest
patron of the Sheikhs, tyrants and dictators all over the World. Its
plea that all this is being done to enhance democracy is totally bogus.
Also it violates the basic dictum that democracy cannot be imported
from outside. The very notion of democracy rests on the will of the
people, free exercise of their mandate. With US army breathing down
the necks of people and committing the atrocities of the type of Abu
Graib, naked human pyramids being made by the sadistic army to torture
the Iraqis, one cannot think of any type of democracy, whatever the
claims. During earlier times the project of 'Exporting Socialism' by
USSR met with a similar fate. These terms themselves are very contradictory
in nature and betray more of the political goals of exporter, rather
than the grass root popular ambitions, where they are imposed. US has
been able to play this game a bit too far, and with the decline of the
other pole of power, the USSR, its aggressive stance is a step ahead
of the earlier imperial powers, the one's which colonized a large part
of the globe in pursuits of markets and raw material.
Another interesting part
of the story is how uniformly the colonizers, imperial powers, pursue
the divide and rule policy. For their own self they project a secular
identity and for their ruled subjects they use the religious, sectarian,
identity. That's what British did to prop up Muslim Communalism (Muslim
League) and Hindu Communalism (Hindu Mahasaba, RSS) in India. They themselves
never identified themselves as Christian rulers. In Iraq, the Shia Sunni
identity has intensified after the US occupation of Iraq and now after
Saddam's execution it will worsen further. In democratic societies over
a period of time narrow sectarian identities get secondary status to
overarching secular identities. Under the rule of external powers, whatever
be their slogan, sectarian identities grow and dominate the social and
political scene.
While one condemns Saddam
for his atrocities against Shias and Kurds and his dictatorial methods,
one realizes that he also emerged as a symbol of resistance against
the imperialist acts of US. Starting from the US invasion of Iraq in
1990, to occupation of Afghanistan and later of Iraq theinsecurity amongst
section of Muslim masses is hitting the roof. In such a situation if
a tyrant like Saddam, defies the US dictates, he naturally emerges as
a hero. It has more to do with the targeting of Muslims than with the
'virtues' of the ilk of Saddam Hussein. It is defiance against the oppressor
that gives hope to the demonized and oppressed sections; it cannot be
construed as the sanction for the tyranny committed by them. Surely
today US is the bully-in-chief and so every powerful voice against it
sounds as a hope for the millions.
There is another analogy
which comes to one's mind. When British ruled India, they also partitioned
the country. US policies have already aggravated the sectarian divides
between Shias, Sunnis and Kurds. The imminent aggravation of civic strife
is on the cards. Who does one blame it on?
As a sidelight, in Indian
scenario, RSS has been the permanent defender of US attacks and aggressions
around the world. Starting from US butchery in Vietnam to the current
US polices in Iraq, this organization has been supported all of these
as a most loyal retainer of Uncle Sam. At the time of attack on Iraq
by US armies, RSS chief vociferously defended the US aggression. In
this case there may be an added glee in the heart of this organization
as their 'permanent enemies'; Muslims are being attacked one way or
the other. And this may be one of the reasons for BJP to look the other
way around when Saddam boldly faced the gallows, when his life was sniffed
out. So martyr for some and villain for the other, he leaves tales for
all the times!
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights