Truth
At Last, While Breaking
A U.S. Taboo Of criticizing Israel
By George Bisharat
04 January,2007
Philadelphia
Inquirer
Americans
owe a debt to former President Jimmy Carter for speaking long hidden
but vital truths. His book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid breaks the
taboo barring criticism in the United States of Israel's discriminatory
treatment of Palestinians. Our government's tacit acceptance of Israel's
unfair policies causes global hostility against us.
Israel's friends have attacked
Carter, a Nobel laureate who has worked tirelessly for Middle East peace,
even raising the specter of anti-Semitism. Genuine anti-Semitism is
abhorrent. But exploiting the term to quash legitimate criticism of
another system of racial oppression, and to tarnish a principled man,
is indefensible. Criticizing Israeli government policies - a staple
in Israeli newspapers - is no more anti-Semitic than criticizing the
Bush administration is anti-American.
The word apartheid typically
evokes images of former South Africa, but it also refers to any institutionalized
regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over
another. Carter applies the term only to Israel's rule of the occupied
Palestinian territories, where it has established more than 200 Jewish-only
settlements and a network of roads and other services to support them.
These settlements violate international law and the rights of Palestinian
property owners. Carter maintains that "greed for land," not
racism, fuels Israel's settlement drive. He is only partially right.
Israel is seizing land and
water from Palestinians for Jews. Resources are being transferred, under
the guns of Israel's military occupation, from one disempowered group
- Palestinian Christians and Muslims - to another, preferred group -
Jews. That is racism, pure and simple.
Moreover, there is abundant
evidence that Israel discriminates against Palestinians elsewhere. The
"Israeli Arabs" - about 1.4 million Palestinian Christian
and Muslim citizens who live in Israel - vote in elections. But they
are a subordinated and marginalized minority. The Star of David on Israel's
flag symbolically tells Palestinian citizens: "You do not belong."
Israel's Law of Return grants rights of automatic citizenship to Jews
anywhere in the world, while those rights are denied to 750,000 Palestinian
refugees who were forced or fled in fear from their homes in what became
Israel in 1948.
Israel's Basic Law of Human
Dignity and Liberty establishes the state as a "Jewish democracy"
although 24 percent of the population is non-Jewish. Adalah, the Legal
Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, counted 20 laws that explicitly
privilege Jews over non-Jews.
The government favors Jews
over Palestinians in the allocation of resources. Palestinian children
in Israel attend "separate and unequal" schools that receive
a fraction of the funding awarded to Jewish schools, according to Human
Rights Watch. Many Palestinian villages, some predating the establishment
of Israel, are unrecognized by the government, do not appear on maps,
and thus receive no running water, electricity, or access roads. Since
1948, scores of new communities have been founded for Jews, but none
for Palestinians, causing them severe residential overcrowding.
Anti-Arab bigotry is rarely
condemned in Israeli public discourse, in which Palestinians are routinely
construed as a "demographic threat." Palestinians in Israel's
soccer league have played to chants of "Death to Arabs!" Israeli
academic Daniel Bar-Tal studied 124 Israeli school texts, finding that
they commonly depicted Arabs as inferior, backward, violent, and immoral.
A 2006 survey revealed that two-thirds of Israeli Jews would refuse
to live in a building with an Arab, nearly half would not allow a Palestinian
in their home, and 40 percent want the government to encourage emigration
by Palestinian citizens. Last March, Israeli voters awarded 11 parliamentary
seats to the Israel Beitenu Party, which advocates drawing Israel's
borders to exclude 500,000 of its current Palestinian citizens.
Some say that Palestinian
citizens in Israel enjoy better circumstances than those in surrounding
Arab countries. Ironically, white South Africans made identical claims
to defend their version of apartheid, as is made clear in books such
as Antjie Krog's Country of My Skull.
Americans are awakening to
the costs of our unconditional support of Israel. We urgently need frank
debate to chart policies that honor our values, advance our interests,
and promote a just and lasting peace in the Middle East. It is telling
that it took a former president, immune from electoral pressures, to
show the way.
The debate should now be
extended. Are Israel's founding ideals truly consistent with democracy?
Can a state established in a multiethnic milieu be simultaneously "Jewish"
and "democratic"? Isn't strife the predictable yield of preserving
the dominance of Jews in Israel over a native Palestinian population?
Does our unconditional aid merely enable Israel to continue abusing
Palestinian rights with impunity, deepening regional hostilities and
distancing peace? Isn't it time that Israel lived by rules observed
in any democracy - including equal rights for all?
George Bisharat ([email protected])
is a professor of law at University of California Hastings College of
the Law. He writes frequently on law and politics in the Middle East.
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights