Arafat
vs Abbas
By Khalid
Amayreh
Al
Ahram
20 July, 2003
Folowing mediation efforts by high-level
Fatah figures, the latest crisis between Palestinian Authority Chairman
Yasser Arafat and Prime his Minister Mahmoud Abbas has been resolved.
However, there are no guarantees that "differences" won't
resurface at anytime.
According to insiders
in Fatah, the mainstream PLO movement headed by Arafat, the crisis stemmed
essentially from a realisation by both Arafat and Abbas that neither
of them is given "enough power" to carry out the tasks entrusted
to them.
Arafat had only
reluctantly agreed to cede some of his powers to Abbas when the latter
was appointed as prime minister under international - mainly American
- pressure a few months ago. Then the power-sharing arrangements between
the "elected" president and the "appointed" prime
minister were far from clear as they didn't draw precise lines between
the powers and responsibilities accorded to thw two.
The problem lingered
and under the pressure of daily events, especially harsh Israeli repression,
was left dormant as long as it was possible. Last week, the problem
resurfaced, straining the chronically uneasy relationship between Arafat
and Abbas.
Arafat, who has
been increasingly feeling that the carpet is being pulled from under
his feet, has been insisting on retaining his basic powers as stipulated
in the "Basic Law", including retaining control over the Palestinian
national security forces and deciding overall national policy, as well
as overseeing negotiations with Israel.
For his part, Abbas
argues that he should be empowered to have control over the day-to-day
security affairs of the PA without any negative interference or interruption
by Arafat and his loyalists.
Without such powers,
he argues, he won't be able to carry out his responsibilities as prime
minister.
"He (Abbas)
wants to be prime minister and not Arafat's shadow," said one Palestinian
minister on condition of anonymity.
One of the key differences
between Arafat and Abbas has centered on the overlap between the responsibilities
of the "interior ministry" and those of Muhammed Dahlan, State
Minister of Security Affairs.
Arafat had insisted
all along that Hani Al-Hasan, one of his loyalists, retain the interior
ministry portfolio.
Abbas, encouraged
by American and international backing, rejected Arafat's position and
insisted instead that he be given control over internal security.
Eventually, a vaguely-worded
compromise was reached whereby the interior ministry portfolio remained
vacant while Muhammed Dahlan was appointed as "state minister"
of security affairs.
The boundaries and
limitations of Dahlan's responsibilities and authorities were never
specified. This in turn has paved the way for frictions, which can potentially
evolve into collisions, between Dahlan's men and Arafat's loyalists
who are still in control of the Palestinian security apparatus.
Furthermore, Arafat
has apparently sought to reassert himself as "the president,"
in part as a defensive reflex against incessant Israeli incitement against
him.
This incitement
reached unprecedented levels this week when several Israeli officials,
including Chief of Staff Moshe Yaalon, declared that the Palestinian
leader should "either be killed or deported."
Moreover, Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon missed no chance to vilify Arafat and accuse
him of impeding and seeking to undermine the Abbas government and consequently
undermine the peace process. Sharon also urged EU states to boycott
Arafat, claiming such a step would accelerate the peace process.
The real Israeli
goal behind this spate of vilification against the Palestinian leader
has nothing to do with any perceived infatuation with Abbas. Rather,
it stems from a certain conviction on the part of the Israeli political-military
establishment that Abbas would be willing to give far-reaching concessions
pertaining to such central issues as Jerusalem, the refugees and Jewish
settlements.
Now, Arafat and
the bulk of the Fatah leadership, while dismissing these "Israeli
whims," could no longer hide their apprehension.
How can they guarantee
that no foul-play takes place? The answer is by keeping Arafat in ultimate
control of the Palestinian National Security Council, a body controlled
that is already controlled by him and which oversees negotiations with
Israel.
To further assert
Fatah's predominant influence over the PA, Arafat last week appointed
Hani Al-Hasan, the former minister of interior, as General Commissioner
of Fatah.
The purpose of this
appointment, which PA sources said had nothing to do with the row between
Arafat and Abbas, seems to be making sure that Fatah remains solidly
behind Arafat in any future dispute between the Palestinian leader and
his prime minister.
The seemingly tentative
agreement between Arafat and Abbas sorted out presidential and premiership
powers according to the "Basic Law".
"The Dispute
is over, and things are alright," Abbas told reporters Monday following
the "reconciliation meeting" with Arafat arranged by Information
Minister Nabil Amr, Arafat Advisor Dr. Saieb Ureikat and Legislative
Council Speaker Ahmed Qrei.
According to the
Ramallah based newspaper, Al-Ayyam, the formula agreed upon by Arafat
and Abbas endorses the reference and follow-up of the negotiating process
through the Higher Committee of Negotiations, which is headed by Arafat
and includes the prime minister.
Moreover, the two
men agreed to appoint Finance Minister Salam Fayyad as a new committee
member. It was not immediately clear if Fayyad had accepted the appointment.
In addition, the
agreement stipulated that Arafat should chair the security committee,
which also includes the prime minister, the state minister of security
affairs, in addition to various security chiefs.
All in all, the
two sides "reconfirmed" anew the distinguished historical
relationship between the president and the prime minister. Arafat re-confirmed
his support of the government of Abbas, whereas Abbas re-confirmed the
role of Arafat as the leader and elected president of the Palestinian
people.
During the meeting,
Abbas declared "I fully support Arafat," and Arafat replied,
"I fully support the government."
The most important
clause of the agreement between Abbas and Arafat was the fact that both
agreed that they would refer any future disputes over powers not spelled
out in the "Basic Law" to a new committee made up of four
high-ranking Fatah figures: Ahmed Qrei and Saeb Ureikat, as well as
Akram Haniyya, a political advisor to Arafat and editor of al-Ayyam
newspaper, and Ghassan el Shakaa, the mayor of Nablus. All four are
known Arafat loyalists.
© Copyright
Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved