Social Change In Ecuador
By Stephen Lendman
15 October, 2007
Correa was elected Ecuador's president last November and took office
January 15 promising social change. He's the country's eighth president
in the last decade including three previous ones driven from office
by mass street protest opposition against their misrule and public neglect.
Correa must now deliver and just got a boost from his governing Movimiento
Alianza Pais' landslide Constituent Assembly election victory to rewrite
the nation's constitution for the 177th time in Ecuador's history hoping
to get it right this time. Awaiting a final tabulation of results, it
appears Correa supporters got around 70% of the vote winning 80 of the
130 Assembly seats. That's a comfortable majority to push through change,
but doing it won't be easy, and Correa's commitment has yet to be tested.
Longtime Latin American expert
James Petras writes "Ecuador today faces great opportunities for
a basic social transformation and also grave threats from imperial networks"
the way states in the region always do. He notes how in recent years
mobilized urban and rural popular classes ousted neoliberal regimes
only to see them resurface under so-called left-center leaders (who
are neither left nor center) like Lula in Brazil, Kirchner in Argentina,
Morales in Bolivia, Vasquez in Uruguay and others. Even Hugo Chavez
governs from the "pragmatic left." He combines grassroots
participatory democracy and redistributive social policies with support
for business interests but on a more equitable basis than under previous
Petras quotes a Forbes magazine
editor's comment on former Mexican president Luis Echeverria (1970 -
1976) that's very revealing and explains Correa's challenge - "He
talks to the Left and works for the Right." That's pretty common
in Latin America today, and Brazil stands out as Exhibit A under former
Workers' Party co-founder and the country's current president, Luiz
Inacio Lula da Silva (2002 to present).
Lula promised social change,
but delivered betrayal. Even before being elected, he signed a letter
of understanding with the IMF promising no change and business as usual.
He agreed to full debt service and repayment terms as well as to back
economic stability and neoliberal policies. He didn't disappoint.
Once elected with a clear
majority, he cut public employee pensions 30%; his agrarian policy subsidized
agribusiness; his promise of land redistribution to the Landless Workers
Movement (MST) was broken; spending for health and education was cut;
employer rights to fire workers and cut severance pay were supported;
extended privatizations of state-owned companies were backed; thuggish
troops occupied Haiti; and right-wing bankers, corporate executives
and free-marketeers were appointed economic ministers and central bankers.
Petras sums up his record saying: "Lula fits the profile of a right-wing
neoliberal politician," not a "center-leftist" one.
Current Argentina president
Nestor Carlos Kirchner is Exhibit B (in office from 2003 to the present
with an October 28 presidential election ahead and the president's wife
ahead in the polls to win it). Petras notes how compared to Lula, he
seems progressive. He cut unemployment from 20 to 15%, raised pensions
and wages, renegotiated part of the country's foreign debt and rescinded
immunity for military torturers although with little to show for it.
In sharp contrast, "fraudulent
privatizations" in Argentina's key industrial areas weren't reversed;
inequalities remained the same or increased in some sectors; poverty
levels are still almost 30%; 10% inflation diluted nominal earnings
gains; the socio-economic power structure stayed the same; Argentina's
thuggish troops occupy Haiti; its central bankers and economic ministers
are hard right; debt service was placed above health and education spending;
and unfettered capitalism was supported following the 2001 economic
collapse and subsequent uprisings. Petras calls Kirchner a "pragmatic
conservative willing to dissent from the US when it" serves Argentina's
business interests. As for being a social democrat? Forget it.
Bolivia's president and first
ever indigenous head of state (2006 to present), Juan Evo Morales Ayma,
is Exhibit C, and along with Lula, the greatest disappointment. Petras
cites his government as "the most striking example of (a) 'center-left'
regime" to betray its supporters and embrace neoliberalim once
in office. Mass uprisings ousted two earlier presidents who defended
foreign investor natural resources ownership, and Bolivians elected
Morales to do what they didn't. Instead, he rejected oil and gas expropriation,
supports Big Oil interests, and embraced business as usual policies.
Under nationalizations Morales-style, current contractual arrangements
are effectively intact, and the country's mineral resources have been
sold off to the greatest ever number of foreign investors.
In addition, Morales broke
his promise to triple the painfully low minimum wage, increased it 10%
instead, and maintained previous neoliberal fiscal austerity and economic
stability policies. He also tolerates the US Drug Enforcement Agency's
intrusive presence and the Pentagon's Chapare military base; appointed
hard right economic, defense and other ministers; opposed agrarian reform;
supports large landowners; provides them large subsidies and tax incentives;
and backs the Confederation of Private Businessmen in Bolivia by promoting
foreign investment, social spending cuts, prioritization of exports,
and other pro-business policies above the interests of the people who
elected him. Petras says Morales "excels in public theater"
by combining "political demagogy" to his base while backing
neoliberal IMF austerity and business-friendly policies.
Here's a sample of the former
from Morales' September 24 UN General Assembly speech when he said:
"....each day we are destroying the future of humanity. (We must)
pinpoint who our enemies are (and the) damage (they do) that may put
an end to humanity....I think that capitalism is the worst enemy of
humanity and if we do not change the model, change the system (our efforts
here) will be totally in vain....Capitalism has twins, the market and
war....This is why (we must) change economic models....particularly
in the western world." It's lovely rhetoric from a man who, in
fact, embraces the model he denounces.
He symbolizes the fantasy
of "new winds from the Left" sweeping the region, but too
many others do as well in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Peru, Chile, Colombia,
Mexico and all of Central America including Costa Rica. There, a US
intimidation campaign narrowly got DR-CAFTA passed in an October 7 national
referendum that still awaits a recount before confirming what pre-referendum
polls predicted would go the other way.
That aside, there's strong
support for the left throughout Latin America that eventually may bubble
up into change. It's too early to know for sure where Correa stands,
but his commitment will soon be fully tested. Here's what he's up against.
US regional dominance is
still strong, and thinking otherwise is misguided. It's not like in
the 1990s "Golden Age of Pillage," but it's still able to
keep business flourishing, including in Venezuela where it's booming.
Nonetheless, a new generation of committed leftist leaders are emerging
with Correa yet to prove he's one of them and may in the end disappoint.
His chance to prove otherwise
is coming, and he won it convincingly with a 54% second round presidential
electoral victory. It was followed by an overwhelming 82% referendum
majority to convoke a Constituent Assembly to draft a new socially progressive
constitution. Correa says it will be based on "principles not models
(and) every country must decide according to its own different realities."
The Assembly will convene the end of October to begin its work with
a long struggle ahead to complete it. It hopes to finish in six months,
but its mandate allows more time if it's needed.
Correa wants the constitution
to "facilitate" foreign investment (especially in banking)
"to force competition." He's against monopolies, traditional
oligarchic power, and the one-sided big media opposition to his government.
He's also renegotiating the country's debt, is assessing its legitimacy,
wants a constitutional limit on its repayment, and intends to keep the
dollar the official currency with eventual plans to abandon it. In addition,
he favors ending the central bank's autonomy, joined the Bank of the
South (to be officially founded November 3 and headquartered in Caracas),
expelled the World Bank's representative in April, is ending relations
with the IMF, and aims to transform the current neoliberal system into
one that will aid "the recovery of the government's planning capacity
(and be a) beginning of the concept of a solidarity system."
Correa's close economic adviser
and leading September 30 vote getter, Alberto Acosta, said the nation's
"economy should be based on human beings" and that capital,
investment, the profit motive motive and workings of the state should
be subordinate to human needs. If Correa supports that view and will
back it fully, he's off to a good start. It's too soon to tell but early
signs are promising.
He talks the talk and is
starting to prove it. He promised social democratic change and a "citizens'
revolution" and said he'll use the country's oil revenues for the
people with a positive step already taken. On October 4, he signed a
decree increasing Ecuador's share of windfall foreign oil company profits
from 50 to 99% while committing to honor existing contracts. Announcing
the move, Correa said: "No more plundering, no more surrender,
no more waste. (Ecuador's oil) now belongs to all Ecuadoreans"
with revenues from it earmarked for social welfare and infrastructure.
Correa also indicated after
a new constitution is drafted and approved by referendum, he'll call
for new elections for president, vice-president and Congress. The current
legislature has no Correa party representatives in it, but he hopes
overwhelming popular support will change that. The sitting Congress,
according to Correa "must be tossed back into the street,"
but that's for the people to decide. Democracy, however, isn't just
about elections. It's about what happens afterwards, and that's for
Correa, the Constituent Assembly and a newly elected Congress to decide.
The September 30 victory
was Correa's third triumph in nine months, and he hailed it saying the
"Ecuadorean people have won the mother of all battles. (It was)
an unquestionable victory." Earlier he echoed Hugo Chavez's call
for a "new socialism of the twenty-first century (and that Ecuador
must end) the perverse (neoliberal) system that has destroyed our democracy,
our economy, our society." He won't have long to back that rhetoric
with action, but doing it won't be easy.
The long shadow of Washington
haunts the region, and its influence pressures and subverts change from
the left. At the same time, countries like Ecuador face conflicting
interests - maintaining the status quo from the right and demands for
real change from below through redistributive social policies and nationalizing
strategic sectors like oil, gas, banks and land.
Petras is hopeful "decay
and profound disintegration of all the traditional parties opens the
way for (progressive) new political forces." He sees an "historical
opening" and opportunity for change through an "alliance of
trade unionists, Indian militants, movement leaders and ecologists"
in the newly formed Polo Democratico (PD). Its agenda calls for a "total
rupture (and) transformation of the Constituent Assembly into the legislative
arm of the peoples' movement." Its aim is bold and revolutionary
- to establish "popular sovereignty" that places basic resources
like oil and gas under "popular self-management" and out of
the hands of local oligarchs and exploitive foreign capital. It's a
national liberation struggle to defeat imperialism and savage capitalism
and return power to the people. Now it's for Correa and his coalition
to prove they're up to the challenge. So far at least, it looks like
lives in Chicago and can be reached at email@example.com.
Also visit his blog site
at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Steve Lendman
News and Information Hour on TheMicroEffect.com now moved to Mondays
at noon US central time.
Share Your Insights
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.