The
BBC's Neocon Propaganda War
By Kosmik Knight
20 April, 2007
Chimes
Of Freedom
The BBC's approach to war and
world affairs is, first and foremost, a reflection of the British puppet
state's viewpoint. It is questionable that the BBC was ever an independent
organization. But, along with the widespread damage to civil and judicial
freedoms caused by the noxious Blair de facto dictatorship, the BBC's
reputation has dropped to an all-time low of news-whoring.
Regular readers of this blog
will know that I am constantly warning them that the Mainstream Media
(MSM) in both the US and the UK --or USUK for convenience-- is deliberately
fuelling speculations that Iran is developing a nuclear weapon and that,
for this reason, the US and possibly Israel might carry out a 'preemptive'
attack on that country.
The BBC's approach amounts
to blatant warmongering. No amount of complaints appear to make the
slightest bit of difference. Financed by a compulsory tax in the form
of a licence fee, payable by anyone owning a television receiver in
the UK, the BBC has huge resources to hand and is a major international
satellite broadcaster.
BBC 24 News is received across
the planet and many viewers mistakenly believe that it practises a balanced
reportage. This is nothing more than a myth which the BBC is, itself,
responsible for having perpetuated. The reality is that, particularly
under the oppressive Blair regime, the BBC has become a servile tool
for the broadcasting of USUK war propaganda.
This was reflected some time
ago in comments made by Professor Professor Geir Lundestad, secretary
of the Norwegian Nobel committee, when he observed that "media
organisations could receive the Nobel peace prize in future."
Prof Lundestad mentioned
several contenders, such as CNN, the New York Times, Le Monde and El
País.
However, he made a notable
exception of the BBC. "Some years ago, the BBC would have been
an obvious candidate because it was the international model for news
organisations. Nowadays, it is more debatable." He added: "We
all know about the problems the BBC has had in recent years," without
elaborating.
(The Guardian, 7 October
2006)
What he wouldn't elaborate
on was the manner in which Tony Blair had fired the then BBC Director,
Greg Dyke, for his daring to criticize Blair on the Irak War and the
--to say the least-- dubious circumstances surrounding the
'suicide' of the ex-IAEA inspector, Dr David Kelly, who
was scapegoated by the Blair regime.
Ever since Dyke's 'resignation'
(he was fired on Blair's instructions) the BBC has taken an extreme
lurch to the neocon
right and the promotion of the Bush-Cheney-Blair-Zionist
war party. Greg Dyke was replaced by a leading zionist, Michael Grade.
Two recent instances of the
BBC's highly propagandistic news coverage has been its anti-Chávez
reportage on Venezuela
and a complete news-blackout on the arrest and trial of two members
of the neo-nazi British National Party who were caught with what was
reported locally as the largest weapons-haul
ever made by the British police.
Not to be unfair, that news-blackout
affected the entire British MSM and appears to have been at the behest
of Blair.
The above are just two instances
taken at random. The actual list of the BBC's right-wing bias would
be unending.
PUBLIC HEALTH WARNING!
The BBC is preparing Britain
and the rest of the world for US military aggression on Iran. Ever since
Bush started his vicious propaganda campaign against Iran, the BBC has
meekly followed suit. No doubt, on Blair's insistence.
Just last night on its News
24 programme it screamed out that the International Atomic Energy Authority
(IAEA) had 'leaked' a document proving that Iran was 'secretly developing
weapons-grade' fissile material. It conspicuously failed to say anything
more about this document so I conducted my own search and found this
Reuters press release.
Can anyone find any evidence
here that the IAEA is warning of Iranian nuclear weapons development?
The Reuters/Yahoo article goes on to make the customary speculations
but evidence there is none.
That didn't stop the BBC
in its headlong rush to serve its neocon bosses in Downing Street and
Washington, DC. Not only is the BBC sure that Iran is developing a nuclear
bomb but that it threatens the continued existence of that famously
peaceable nation, Israel, with the nasty terrorist proxy, Hezbollah,
provocatively flying its flags along the Israel-Lebanon frontier.
The BBC then
interviewed several Israeli 'experts' who, naturally, spoke
in the most objective manner of how Israel was victim to threats from
Iran and why a 'pre-emptive' attack against its nuclear reactors would,
therefore, be the most sensible thing to do.
Of course, no mention was
made by the BBC's jejune reporter, Matthew Price, of the terrible radioactive
aftermath to which such an attack would lead, making Chernobyl pale
into significance, or the even greater holocaust of a US-led attack
using so-called 'low-yield' tactical nuclear weapons.
To get things into perspective,
these 'low-yield' tactical nukes are capable of anything between a third
to six times the destruction caused by the Hiroshima-Nagasaki bombs.
The US Military now considers this level of destruction to be "acceptable."
And so does the BBC apparently which keeps its lips sealed about the
US nuclear option.
The BBC has, so far, failed
to report on another significant statement from Iran that that country
is reluctant
to exit the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to which it,
unlike Israel, is a signatory.
So much for its 'balanced'
reporting.
The BBC's approach to war
and world affairs is, first and foremost, a reflection of the British
puppet state's viewpoint. It is questionable that the BBC was ever an
independent organization. But, along with the widespread damage to civil
and judicial freedoms caused by the noxious Blair de facto dictatorship,
the BBC's reputation has dropped to an all-time low of news-whoring.
Does it care? I doubt it.
It and its employees now see themselves sliding down the slippery slope
to privatization so, in the meantime, will do anything to ingratiate
themselves with Britain's rulers. It's a very sad day when a well-known
British dissident (himself a victim of Blair's tyranny), ex-Ambassador
Craig Murray, admits to better treatment from Rupert Murdoch's SKY
News than from the BBC.
Those in Britain who are
concerned at the rapidity their country is being turned into a police
state should, without any further delay, launch a popular campaign to
expose the BBC's dirty warmongering. A vital part of such a campaign
should be the promotion of a countrywide non-payment of the annual licence
fee, the BBC's life-blood.
The BBC should also be subject
to a mass letter-writing campaign in which it is warned that it and
its employees would be held to be war criminals for their further promotion
of illegal military occupations by the USUK and for their gleeful promotion
of a possible upcoming war against Iran.
Click
here to comment
on this article