Hamid's
Message To The World:
A Kashmiri Cry For Sanity
By Yoginder Sikand
17 March,
2004
countercurrents.org
Some
months ago I received a long email message from someone whom I shall
call Hamid. He had come across an article I had written on Kashmiri
Sufism that was posted on a website, from which he had obtained my email
address.
'Dear Brother',
the letter began, 'Allow me to introduce myself'. Hamid then went on
to explain who he was and why he was writing to me. He hailed, he said,
from a town in the Indian-administered part of Kashmir, and was the
only son of his parents. More than ten years ago, at the height of the
militant movement in Kashmir, he had been contacted by a certain militant
outfit, and had been lured across the border into Pakistan for military
training. He was told that India would soon be forced out of Kashmir
by dint of so-called 'jihad'. An 'Islamic' state would be established,
which would bring all the Muslims of the world under its ambit. The
'unbelieving' 'enemies of Islam' would be trampled upon, and Muslims
would finally regain their lost glory. He was inspired to believe that
if he were to sacrifice his life in 'jihad' against India he would inherit
a vast mansion in paradise and be tended upon by a train of virgin houris.
Hamid was then an
impressionable youth in his late teens. He had seen several of his fellow
Kashmiris being killed by Indian soldiers. He had himself been once
beaten by an Indian soldier for no reason whatsoever when Indian troops
launched a crackdown in his locality searching for a militant. Crossing
over to Pakistan to receive armed training and then going back to India
to wage 'jihad' against India appeared to him as the only way to extract
revenge for the humiliation that his people had suffered. Accordingly,
he willingly signed up to join a band of youth from his town heading
across the treacherous mountain passes of Kupwara into Pakistani-administered
Kashmir.
Hamid spent three
months at a training camp located in a remote area near the North-West
Frontier Province run by a particularly hardline Islamist group. There,
he was taught to handle various weapons and was also fed with a steady
diet of fiery jihadist rhetoric. Every evening the trainees would gather
at the mosque, where a maulvi owing allegiance to the ultra fanatic
Lashkar-i Tayyeba ('The Army of the Pure') would deliver impassioned
speeches railing against India, branding all Hindus as 'enemies of Islam'.
'Islam has come to rule the world, and not to be ruled', the maulvi
asserted. All non-Muslims, he claimed, were engaged in a sinister plot
to wipe out Islam from off the face of the earth.
Somewhere towards
the end of his training period, serious doubts began haunting Hamid.
Although he had been vehemently opposed to the Indian army, he never
had any hatred for Hindus as such. Several of his closest friends at
school back in Kashmir had been Hindus. His favourite teacher was a
Pundit, who had treated him as his own son. Often, his Hindu friends
would accompany him to the shrine of Kashmir's patron saint, the Sufi
Hazrat Nuruddin Nurani or Nund Rishi, who, although a devout Muslim,
was widely revered by Kashmiri Hindus as well. He could, therefore,
hardly believe that all Hindus were all involved in a grand conspiracy
against Islam. Every evening his mother would read the Quran to him
and then recite some verses of Nund Rishi. They spoke of love and concern
for all, irrespective of caste and creed. Nund Rishi's Islam, Hamid
began to realise, seemed to have nothing in common with the doctrine
of hatred and terror that the maulvi was so passionately peddling.
Not only did the
maulvi insist that all non-Muslims were 'enemies of God' and 'friends
of the Devil', but he also declared that Muslims who did not subscribe
to his own hardline version of Islam were Muslims in name alone, and,
for all practical purposes, infidels. Much of the maulvi's ire was directed
at Sufism, which he branded as a 'conspiracy' allegedly hatched by the
'enemies' of the faith to dampen Muslims' fervour of armed jihad and
thereby destroy Islam from within. He equated Sufism with 'wrongful'
innovation (bid'at) and polytheism (shirk), insisting that Muslims who
followed the Sufis were doomed to eternal perdition in hell. He made
it amply clear that after the mujahidin had managed to 'liberate' Kashmir
from India they would launch a second jihad, this time to cleanse Kashmir
of all vestiges of Sufism.
The maulvi's bitter
harangue against the Sufis struck Hamid as particularly obnoxious. Most
Kashmiri Muslims held the Sufis in deep reverence, and Hamid could not
imagine that God would ever send his own people to hell for their love
of the gentle mystics of Islam. After all, he knew, it was the Sufis
who had brought Islam to Kashmir. It was they, and not people like the
maulvi, who had spread Islam in the region, by winning the hearts of
the Kashmiris with their message of love, justice and equality. He shuddered
at the thought of the likes of the maulvi taking over Kashmir and violently
destroying the hallowed shrines of the Sufis, as the Wahhabis had done
in Saudi Arabia a century ago.
After the three
month training course got over, Hamid was instructed to slip across
the Line of Control and return to Indian-administered Kashmir to carry
out 'operations' against the Indian armed forces. However, he refused,
and one day he slipped out of the camp and travelled to a distant town.
By this time, he was firmly convinced that the Pakistani jihadists had
actually little or no concern for the plight of the Kashmiri Muslims.
He had heard numerous stories of self-styled jihadists raping women
and murdering innocent people, Hindus as well as Muslims, back home
in Kashmir. He had seen several jihadist leaders in Pakistan who had
accumulated vast amounts of money from the public in the name of jihad,
with which they had built fancy bungalows for themselves. Many of them
sent their own children to posh schools, while at the same time exhorting
poor families to send their children to die in the killing fields of
Kashmir. Many jihadists were in reality nothing more than brutal mercenaries
who were paid to work for various groups and the Pakistani intelligence
agencies. He had even heard of some militants, mainly Punjabi and Pathan,
who believed that Muslim women belonging to non-Wahhabi families could
be enslaved as virtual sex objects. Moreover, the widespread corruption
that he saw all around him in Pakistan, what he called the hypocrisy
of its religious and political elites, the pathetic state of education
in the country and the lack of many basic freedoms, convinced him that
joining Pakistan would spell doom for his own people. Pakistan was certainly
not the 'land of the pure' that he was earlier given to believe.
Hamid now manages
to survive on a meagre two thousand rupees a month that some kind soul
provides him with. He desperately wants to leave Pakistan, he says.
He has not seen his parents ever since he slipped out of his house one
night ten years ago and crossed over to Pakistan. Memories of home and
of his land continue to haunt him, and the very thought that he might
never see his family again is terrifying, he says. Ideally, he would
like to return to his home to 'serve' his parents, as he says, and to
lead a quiet life. But then that might mean death for him, whether at
the hands of the ISI, or militant outfits or even the Indian armed forces.
He has thought of migrating to a third country, in the hope that he
might arrange to meet his parents some day. But he has no passport or
legal travel documents, and even if he did, which country would accept
a refugee from Pakistan, he asks, given the notoriety that the country
has earned as a breeding ground for terrorists?
Hamid today has
no illusions about Pakistan. Militancy is not the way out, he insists,
and says that violence can only be counterproductive for the Kashmiris
themselves. 'If only our youth back in the Valley could see the reality
of Pakistan for themselves they would realise the criminal folly of
supporting the militants', he writes. Yet, he does not absolve India
of its share of the blame either. He cannot forget, he says, the scores
of innocent people who have lost their lives in Kashmir, many at the
hands of the Indian army. Hindu militancy is only making the problem
more intractable, he says. The recent anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat
has further hardened anti-Indian feelings in Kashmir, and he shudders
to imagine what would happen in the future. 'Hindutvawadis', he argues,
'are, along with Islamist radicals, the greatest enemies of Indian unity
and Hindu-Muslim amity'. I could hardly disagree. 'How can the Hindutva-walas
expect to win the hearts of the Kashmiris if they carry on with their
anti-Muslim crusade?', he very rightly asks. Yet, he also adds that
the best realistic option for the Kashmiris is to remain with India-not
a Hindutva-ruled India but an India that is genuinely secular and accepting
of people of all faiths and ethnicities.
Hamid ends his letter
with the following lines:
'My dear brother.
The reason that I am writing to you is to tell you that for the sake
of all people in our part of the world, and particularly for the Kashmiris,
we have to struggle against all forms of fascism parading in the guise
of religion, Hindu as well as Muslim. Terrorism in a religious garb
is the grossest insult to God and true religion imaginable, as I have
myself learnt the hard way. I hope you will reflect on what I have said,
and will convey this message to your friends and to the world at large.
Khuda Hafiz and
Namastey. May God bless and guide us all.
Your brother-in-humanity
Hamid K.'
I wonder if he will
read this article, but if he does I must tell him, 'Yes, brother Hamid,
I am doing your bidding in my own small way'.
Yoginder
Sikand is the editor Qalandar.